Brolic Scholar
Licensed Text Technician
I guess the agent that the movie is about was actually a c00n that infiltrated black organizations?






Yeah that the ugly truth of it.I guess the agent that the movie is about was actually a c00n that infiltrated black organizations?
![]()
this entire statement about the movie makes no damned sense... When it's about a Black cop infiltrating the KKK.... Cointelpro was started by J edgar hoover and the FBI to dismantle black groups... The KKK STILL exists more or les... So what the fukk is the point??? 

Lol criticism is not beefTwo black directors both made very good black movies, why the fukk are they now beefing in the fukking media![]()
Bullshyt. Our current generation is easily led by Boule militants like Spike and Angela Rye who feign wokeness while working alongside liberal elites to placate the natives and keep the neocolonial enclaves of black America stable and under control.only thing is the police and the feds are too toxic for the black community to ever fully turn the cheek and embrace them

Holy shyt ain't this brah from the Coup
He making movies now?
Props

Its just criticism not a hit jobI'm going to take a different viewpoint. I don't really think this movie did that much to glorify cops or make them seem like allies to black people. The only person who really went at the KKK hard in the movie was Ron Stallworth himself (how accurate that is, is up for debate). Even Adam Driver's character said fukk this after a certain point. I thought the overarching theme was not to put cops in a good light, but to highlight the same racism that was practiced 40 years ago, still exists and is being practiced the same exact way now.
Movies often exaggerate the truth for artistic expression. This movie wasn't a blockbuster and I'd like to think a large part of the audience understands that parts were exaggerated for that very reason.
Boots needs to fall back here. You can expose the system without taking down someone else who should be your ally. I'm of the mindset if you have different approaches, but common goals you should just shut the fukk up in the public sphere.
its not like Boots is pulling a Monique or something. Criticism isn't divisive. Its the boarding the windows and immediate side taking that's more damaging imoSooner or later they all toe the lineDamn, Spike. Et tu, Brutus?![]()

Soon or later they all toe the line![]()

Bullshyt. Our current generation is easily led by Boule militants like Spike and Angela Rye who feign wokeness while working alongside liberal elites to placate the natives and keep the neocolonial enclaves of black America stable and under control.![]()
Its just criticism not a hit jobits not like Boots is pulling a Monique or something. Criticism isn't divisive. Its the boarding the windows and immediate side taking that's more damaging imo
If you're not strong enough to receive criticism or give honest criticism of your own, then how strong are you really? It ain't that big of a deal in an industry where checks get cut for the most trivial of reasons anyways. Would've definitely liked to know upfront if true though.