"Both sides are the same"... anybody who says this is a dumbass and should be slapped on sight

delta

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,265
Reputation
1,225
Daps
25,255
Reppin
NULL
even i was Bernie or die and still voted for that witch Hillary

never understood this shyt at all. theres no excuse not to vote nowadays with mail-ins and early periods.
:hhh: i know ultimately dependence on the Democrat party is a dangerous thing because they will take you for granted... but what choice do you have at this point.
 

Menelik II

I wanna see receipts!
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
4,914
Reputation
1,034
Daps
14,907
i don't think people really mean they're 'both the same', but the fact they are on the same part of the political space: right wing authoritarian.

the only real difference between them is religiosity.

trump is doesnt represent the GOP voice, just like bernie wasn't democrat.
 

Black Nate Grey

The God Emperor of Mankind
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
7,343
Reputation
3,206
Daps
29,961
Yeah I generally hate the "but both sides", it's generally a lazy and disingenuous argument especially when it comes to things like race.
But Hilary is a neo-con and was a terrible candidate.

Better than Trump though.

I think.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
326,277
Reputation
-34,105
Daps
633,157
Reppin
The Deep State
i don't think people really mean they're 'both the same', but the fact they are on the same part of the political space: right wing authoritarian.

the only real difference between them is religiosity.

trump is doesnt represent the GOP voice, just like bernie wasn't democrat.
oh no, no, no :ufdup:

Dont do that. :francis:

There are many people, on this forum, who believe this :stopitslime:

Don't let them skate.

These zero sum fukkboys deserve to rot in gulags. They're petulant children who don't know the nuances of negotiation, much less the value of sincere and realistic policy.

Hillary would have given you realistic benefits, squashed the alt-right sentiment (or sucked energy out of it), and promoted advances that we all would have benefitted from.

People expect to be in love with their politicians. These people aren't friends. You do business with them. And you damn sure don't forego everything just to make yourself feel better about yourself. No one gives a flying greasy fukk about your feelings. The entire purpose of voting is to pick the BEST candidate. You compromise every time you cast every vote.




Stupid people get to vote. Don't take that agency away from them. They own this 100%.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
326,277
Reputation
-34,105
Daps
633,157
Reppin
The Deep State
But Hilary is a neo-con and was a terrible candidate.
She was not a fukking neocon.

Jesus. fukking. Christ.

You all just sling buzzwords like its halloween candy and expect daps and reps for that shyt to your co-lowbrow residents in the hell hole of irrelevancy where your ideological peers reside.

Grow the fu¢k up
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
326,277
Reputation
-34,105
Daps
633,157
Reppin
The Deep State
Democrats are the only ones who hate the "both sides are evil" argument.

They're still desperate to get people to vote for their garbage party with their "lesser of two evils" bullshyt.
The party isn't garbage.

The fact is that racists and selfish idiots still get to cast votes.

Stop ignoring willing participants.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,225
Reputation
7,216
Daps
150,153
Reppin
CookoutGang
Shut yo uneducated ass up. They are the same and it's been exposed for years of them being the same. The stupidity comes from the individual who thinks their party is superior when they are blind to the facts.
Just shut the fukk up. And stay that way. :hhh:


Democrats are the only ones who hate the "both sides are evil" argument.

They're still desperate to get people to vote for their garbage party with their "lesser of two evils" bullshyt.
because conservatives know both sides aren't the same and benefit from the argument.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
32,728
Reputation
9,949
Daps
109,283
Reppin
Brooklyn
Yeah I generally hate the "but both sides", it's generally a lazy and disingenuous argument especially when it comes to things like race.
But Hilary is a neo-con and was a terrible candidate.

Better than Trump though.

I think.
Better than trump is a low benchmark when it's arguable we haven't seen a worse political figure since Stalin died. The only difference between him and men like that is that his attempts to commit the same atrocities is that said attempts are in the future and not the past.
 

Gus Money

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,543
Reputation
1,581
Daps
30,557
It's a dumb, lazy argument. The democrats are far from perfect, but to say that both sides are the same is flat out dumb.

Both sides aren't trying to terminate health coverage for millions of people (and drinking beer while they're doing it).

Both sides aren't trying to suppress the right to vote for poor people and people of color.

Both sides aren't telling poor people to just pull themselves out of poverty without providing any type of framework or opportunity to do so.

Sure the democrats have plenty of problems, we know this. Are there racist democrats? Yes! Nobody has said otherwise.

But do the democrats use blatantly racist dog whistle tactics to drum up votes among poorly educated white people who fear people of color? Are they avoiding their constituency in town halls so they don't have to answer for screwing over their base? Not the last time I checked.
 

levitate

I love you, you know.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
41,020
Reputation
6,729
Daps
156,634
Reppin
The Multiverse
  • Hillary would not have nominated Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (a decision with decades-long consequences...)
  • Hillary would not have supported the repeal of the ACA.
  • Hillary would not have proposed a budget that reduced EPA funding by 30%
  • Hillary would not have appointed racist ass Sessions as Attorney General
  • Hillary would not have nominated unqualified ass DeVos as Secretary of Education.

I can go on...

These are clear differences that have a direct effect on us as citizens.

FOH to anyone that says that "there's no difference" or "voting doesn't matter". fukk off. Instant ignore. It's not up for debate.
 
Top