RickyDiBiase
aka Hash Brown Hands
See how it works both ways?
#BothSidesPlayedWell
No shyt sherlock

Its almost like people have fundamental differences
See how it works both ways?
#BothSidesPlayedWell

And Mitch McConnell was the reason the bill went from $2000 to $600. According to your logic this is also pelosi's fault for not appeasing 53 republican senators in her initial bill.
Of course, like the WWE Wrestlers.No shyt sherlock
Its almost like people have fundamental differences
And that’s your choice. I was just explaining the fact that the private entity that controls the country’s money supply also controls both political parties is why certain people don’t believe in either political party. They both work towards the interest of this entity which is against the interest of the public. Once they signed over the control of the money over to billionaires in 1913 (DEMOCRATIC prez Woodrow Wilson) politics was done. That essentially allowed them to buy out anyone they wanted or bankrupt anyone they wanted that opposed.I look at which tactics are less damaging overall...
like i said... lesser of two evils
![]()
Mnuchin and Trump's Bill had $1200 checks too. Pelosi could have even voted against the Bill, but the Democrat controlled house would have still passed it, so appeasing any Republicans has nothing to do with this. The only thing that kept it from passing both houses was Pelosi, and her determination to make sure no legislation passed making Trump look good, just like Republicans are doing now with the border. She proposed a $2.2T package, was countered with a $1.8T package, turned it down only to settle on a $900bn package after the election. You can't juelz your way out those facts.
Of course, like the WWE Wrestlers.
Meanwhile the wealth gap keeps increasing and the top 10 own an inordinate amount of assets.No more threads addressing bothsiders. It makes zero sense to talk at length with receipts about this topic. You have Republicans who have been in congress for 16 years (Jim Jordan) who created 30 fukkING bills since he has been in office and done absolutely nothing of note to help anybody but is now helping Trump.
Cats will argue this is less harmful than Democrats and often won't provide good reasoning.
Proof on Jordan by the way cause I believe in not arguing emotionally: https://www.congress.gov/member/jim-jordan/J000289?pageSize=250&q={"sponsorship"%3A"sponsored"%2C"type"%3A"bills"%7D
It becomes annoying having to argue how a politician, nationally or locally, has helped me and having it diminished as "well what did it do for black people specifically."
No, fukk that. I know a few black families that ate off of Biden's child tax credit setup the past few years. I still have fam who have health insurance thanks to Obama raising the eligible age to use the parent's insurance.
I'M CURRENTLY eating from Obama due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act using the America Opportunity Tax Credit that was also renewed repeatedly, first from the PATH act back in 2015 (Obama again.).
I'm paying for school 100% out of pocket and while I can't use FAFSA, i'm getting back $2,500 a year for 4 years of college. That is actually meaningful and makes the whole joint easier to deal with. If I went into minutia, I can name dozens of things Dems have done that have made me and other black peoples lives better, but if things aren't fixed altogether, it functionally didn't happen in some folks minds. Stop validating that bum ass perspective.
One man can slap you. Another can shoot you. They did not harm you equally. FOH.

This topic came up before recently. Both parties have a history of stalling legislation if campaigning off of it benefits them more. I'll provide the exact same example of Dems doing it, as in the previous thread:
Right before the 2020 election, Congress was negotiating a new Stimulus package and Trump and Munichin offered up a deal that included much of what Dems wanted. Nancy Pelosi refused to put it up for a vote. Here is a video of CNN reporter Wolf Blitzer damn near begging Pelosi to put the bill up for a vote. Pelosi didn't want those $2000 checks to go out before the election signed by Trump. This was in October of 2020, shortly after lockdowns and many still out of work.
No its not. #bothsides is an insult just like #berniebros was. I guess youre not allowed to critique anything your party does or point out something the other party is doing rightthe bothsides arguement is that both sides are equal...
understanding the lesser of two evils is the antithesis of the bothsides argument....
“Speak on it god” -Lord Jamarlol lesser of two evils.
How is letting unlimited migrants flood into the country, taking care of them with tax-payer dollars and moving them into primarily black neighborhoods less evil?
How is ignoring your most loyal base but instead giving them chicken and house parties come voting time less evil? Meanwhile Israel and Ukraine gets countless billions and we're on the precipice of a war on multiple fronts, having to possibly engage Russia and having to engage several Arab nations and Iran on Israel's behalf?
Let's not mention massive inflation and the possible overthrow of the petrodollar under Biden's watch, which will lead to even more massive inflation.
I'm not seeing the 'less evil' here. They look every bit as evil as what we've seen out of the Republican party.
Meanwhile the wealth gap keeps increasing and 6 the top 10 own an inordinate amount of assets.
You’re a person getting fleeced fight another person that is getting fleeced because he doesn’t root for your team. Meanwhile the fleecer is fleecing everyone lol. Pathetic but maybe they’ll double down on the prideful idiots
![]()
What? You have completely missed the mark. I can be unhappy about one party while not incorrectly conflating them as the same as another.