You didn’t respond to my question.
What did you review to determine that there wasn’t definitive proof either way?
I understand that you don’t follow experts and that you instead think for yourself when it comes to COVID. You haven’t explained, in any level of detail, how you did that.
If you feel I don’t get what you’re saying, it’s because you haven’t actually said anything yet, and I’m trying to get you to say something.
To boil it down, I understand that you disagree with my approach of relying on experts. We don’t have to discuss that further. I’m not trying to convince you to rely on experts. I’m trying to understand what you reviewed in order to determine that there wasn’t definitive proof either way with regards to COVID vaccines.
I am not interested in your opinion on my decision to rely on experts. We can dead that discussion.BRUH
HOW MANY EXPERTS SAID DIFFERENT THINGS, MADE NUMEROUS CLAIMS THAT CONTRADICT ONE ANOTHER, MOVE GOAL POSTS, CHANGE THEIR MIND?
ITS HAPPENED RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES IN REAL TIME N U STILL NEED ME TO BREAK IT DOWN??
Are you going to explain what you reviewed in order to determine that there was no definitive proof either way with regards to COVID vaccines? I’ve asked you that now 3 or 4 times.




