Breaking: FBI manhunt underway for Texas House Democrats

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
39,641
Reputation
-2,954
Daps
87,800
Exactly, Illinois can simply say, any federal action in my state to enforce laws from another state will be considered a hostile action and the FBI agents will be arrested and charged with trafficking.
yep, other receptive states could arrest the FBI agents and thats supposed to be the check on these things.
If Trump allowing stupid shyt enables the actual seperation of powers into the state and fed make a comeback just to spite him, thats about the only good thing I can see happening this admin.

The Texas governor was doing the right thing by working with the legislature to get them removed from their seats for this stunt, and then the legislature would just have to change the rule or law and punish those for doing this shyt.

Filibusters are one thing, and I respect that, at least they are at work, but leaving is beyond childish and is just failure to do your job.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,257
Reputation
-1,708
Daps
151,258
Reppin
Na
Exactly, Illinois can simply say, any federal action in my state to enforce laws from another state will be considered a hostile action and the FBI agents will be arrested and charged with trafficking.

Pritzer might do something because he a billionaire and wanna run for President
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,257
Reputation
-1,708
Daps
151,258
Reppin
Na
If Pritzer resists, guarantee we get Cops or National Guardsmen flipping to the other side

The only way we dont get armed skirmishes is if Democrats just roll over

Trump might want it to go ahead and cancel mid terms, and declare himself supreme
 

bzb

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
4,065
Reputation
2,677
Daps
22,613
this is bullshyt. first of all, the fbi can't be used for non federal complaints.

second, the right wing supreme court refused to get involved in illegal redistricting. which is why texas dems dipped out. the sc said it's a "political issue". illegal redistricting to give gop control of the house so they can push a fascist agenda is more than just a political issue...it's illegal.

dems better do this illegal redistricting bull in every state with a dem gov. i'm tired of that "they go low we go high" bs. dems better start slinging mud and kicking old ladies down the stairs. fight fire with fire. repubs started this and made it fair game.
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,331
Reputation
886
Daps
18,945
yall keep saying this, but the South literally started a conspiracy to kill Lincoln over the civil war, and succeeded. Thats why he was killed.

The replacing president was sympathetic to the South and cared less for Black people

thats right, white racists got away with killing the president back then
And they completely killed reconstruction during the process
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,257
Reputation
-1,708
Daps
151,258
Reppin
Na
this is bullshyt. first of all, the fbi can't be used for non federal complaints.

second, the right wing supreme court refused to get involved in illegal redistricting. which is why texas dems dipped out. the sc said it's a "political issue". illegal redistricting to give gop control of the house so they can push a fascist agenda is more than just a political issue...it's illegal.

dems better do this illegal redistricting bull in every state with a dem gov. i'm tired of that "they go low we go high" bs. dems better start slinging mud and kicking old ladies down the stairs. fight fire with fire. repubs started this and made it fair game.
fukk the feds

If they ever get through this they need to be raked over the coals as traitors

They never need to be given any sort of reverence again, ala the Mueller shyt
 

RamsayBolton

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,251
Reputation
3,088
Daps
60,482
Is this supposed to be disagreeing that the Union was too soft on the south?
yes and no

just saying the union was too soft feels like a simplification of the landscape when white racists were able to get away with killing the president

its kinda like how people look at democrats and republicans these days. basically the union was never gonna be the kind of dudes we needed them to be. democrats are not the kind of opposition we need them to be
 

kdslittlebro

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2018
Messages
23,764
Reputation
3,309
Daps
79,025
yes and no

just saying the union was too soft feels like a simplification of the landscape when white racists were able to get away with killing the president

its kinda like how people look at democrats and republicans these days. basically the union was never gonna be the kind of dudes we needed them to be. democrats are not the kind of opposition we need them to be
Oh I’m not saying they were gonna do what needed to be done; history says otherwise. Just that that was a point in history that could have changed everything
 
Top