#BREAKING: Supreme Court rules against Trump adding citizenship question to 2020 US Census

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,247
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,716
Reppin
Brooklyn
Just got an alert from WaPo saying Trump wants to delay the census
 

Meta Reign

I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reputation
-3,596
Daps
6,601
Reppin
Franklin ave.
Big loss for the administration. . .

And to conclude that they can not find good enough reason for the question is complete bullshyt. . . I really wonder how compromised these people are behind the scenes man. These decisions literally make no sense.

How can you live in a country (regardless of your political leanings) where you can't ask who is a citizen?

Seriously, do you even HAVE a county at that point?
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,247
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,716
Reppin
Brooklyn
Big loss for the administration. . .

And to conclude that they can not find good enough reason for the question is complete bullshyt. . . I really wonder how compromised these people are behind the scenes man. These decisions literally make no sense.

How can you live in a country (regardless of your political leanings) where you can't ask who is a citizen?

Seriously, do you even HAVE a county at that point?

Your brain is rotting
 

Meta Reign

I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reputation
-3,596
Daps
6,601
Reppin
Franklin ave.
All you are replying with ad homs and emotion based posts. . No real rebutals.

I'm right. No one can refute that.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,740
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,668
Reppin
CookoutGang
All you are replying with ad homs and emotion based posts. . No real rebutals.

I'm right. No one can refute that.
ROBERTS GAVE YOU THE REASON:

Agencies must offer “genuine justifications for important decisions, reasons that can be scrutinized by courts and the interested public,” Roberts wrote. “Accepting contrived reasons would defeat the purpose of the enterprise. If judicial review is to be more than an empty ritual, it must demand something better than the explanation offered for the action taken in this case.”
 
Top