Brehs, how the fukk does Rihanna have over 200 million sales? wtf brehs

Foxy Brown

Andrea Y. Small Gardner
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
464
Reputation
380
Daps
1,600
Reppin
Jordan, Jasmine, Jolie, Julius
If it was that easy the industry would have more than a handful of mega stars :snoop:

She has a voice people people like, she interprets songs in a way people like, she's obviously a good performer, she has a personality that people tend to like (even though it's shifted like 5 times since her start) and on. And I'm pretty sure that Jay-z isn't telling her to become a weed head and go to Barbados and just get high with her girls and fly around the world turning up like a trap rapper. This is the dude that treats his career like an athlete and so does his wife.

And Rihanna is on Roc Nation, she has always stayed loyal to Ty, Jay, Jay Brown and that crew. So I don't know why you are talking about "white execs".
My guess is that she has a saying in what she wants, she has made enough money for cats to have earned her respect to do whatever she wants. If she says that she wants some trap shyt and how it should sound she'll get it. If she wants reggae/dancehall , she'll get it. But people will bring her songs as well, doesn't mean that she's forced to accept.

The same could be said about actresses in Hollywood, if was that easy, Hollywood wouldn't be feel with tons of actresses waiting for that big moment.

Rihanna's voice is debatable just like Britney Spears. Rihanna is not a great performer, have you been to any of her concerts? She's subpar.

Who own Def Jam? White, Jewish people. They make the final decision. They are the fukking boss. Remember that!

Like I stated Rihanna is talentless, a puppet. You haven't prove otherwise besides that she pick out what songs she like.


Woohoo that's really great. That's totally great!! That shows that she's such a terrific artist.
 

Foxy Brown

Andrea Y. Small Gardner
Joined
Nov 24, 2015
Messages
464
Reputation
380
Daps
1,600
Reppin
Jordan, Jasmine, Jolie, Julius
She is the quintessential manufactured pop star. Don't fall for the okey doke.

She manufactured her own self that's what I'm saying. She didnt have a puppeteer. She came up marketing ploys to garner attention and was very success.

Well can y'all show me some proof that she doesn't write her own songs, she doesn't come up with concepts, anything that proves her image was created?

I'm willing to agree that she's mediocre. But, she's always been apart of the process of creating her mediocre artistry.
 

Mike Otherz

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
5,237
Reputation
-175
Daps
10,322
Reppin
NULL
HGH sales. 200 million? She barely goes platinum stateside with her albums. But in the social media era, album sales are not important. Showingnya ass on social media is. Kim.kardashian is probably the biggest celeb of this era. She could probably sell a much as rihanna.
 

eastside313

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
19,130
Reputation
1,247
Daps
38,672
She manufactured her own self that's what I'm saying. She didnt have a puppeteer. She came up marketing ploys to garner attention and was very success.

Well can y'all show me some proof that she doesn't write her own songs, she doesn't come up with concepts, anything that proves her image was created?

I'm willing to agree that she's mediocre. But, she's always been apart of the process of creating her mediocre artistry.
You could atleast do a google search on Madonna before you come in here propping her up. Madonna was put on by one of the biggest in the game from back in those times. Madonna was a drug addicted whore.


Madonna The Thief - The Many Artists Madonna Has Stolen From For Her Albums And Reinventions
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
34,346
Reputation
-723
Daps
70,150
Nobody said it's easy . . but how much room is there for megastars? Someone has to shine brighter than someone else to be an upper-echelon star . . The market can only support so many "superstars". they have their target audiences . . why would the labels seek to crowd their pools?


Madonna writes her own songs now brehs :mjlol:
Nobody said it's easy . . but how much room is there for megastars? Someone has to shine brighter than someone else to be an upper-echelon star . . The market can only support so many "superstars". they have their target audiences . . why would the labels seek to crowd their pools?


Madonna writes her own songs now brehs :mjlol:

They can diversify, they can control releases and if they weren't trying to add more why would they be signing all these off brand copies? Ariana, Selena Gomez, Tanasge, Rita Ora and whatever the fukk their names are. Where's the new Bieber? Where are the new green day? Limp Bizkit, new country star now that Taylor has transformed.
 
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,582
Reputation
420
Daps
7,136
Reppin
NULL
The same could be said about actresses in Hollywood, if was that easy, Hollywood wouldn't be feel with tons of actresses waiting for that big moment.

Rihanna's voice is debatable just like Britney Spears. Rihanna is not a great performer, have you been to any of her concerts? She's subpar.

Who own Def Jam? White, Jewish people. They make the final decision. They are the fukking boss. Remember that!

Like I stated Rihanna is talentless, a puppet. You haven't prove otherwise besides that she pick out what songs she like.


Woohoo that's really great. That's totally great!! That shows that she's such a terrific artist.
I disagree with some of this. Rihannas is levels more talented than Britney Spears first of all. To say she has no talent is kind of absurd. The fact that she's extremely pretty and west Indian helps a lot towards her world wide appeal. Like dude said the powers that be couldn't turn just anybody into a mega star. Look at Tierra Marie. Gorgeous and also was on Def Jam yet she's lucky if she could make it big in porn at this point. Also I don't think live performance ability really matters for a pop artist like Rihanna. Her fans don't give a fukk. These sheep wouldn't even know if she lipsynced every word of every song. Did I mention she's attractive? Like an Adele could actually eat in the pop world? Hahahaha not a chance. The power behind these big acts obviously is a huge factor but they do need to find the right "puppet" first
 

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,991
Daps
22,596
Reppin
Love
They can diversify, they can control releases and if they weren't trying to add more why would they be signing all these off brand copies? Ariana, Selena Gomez, Tanasge, Rita Ora and whatever the fukk their names are. Where's the new Bieber? Where are the new green day? Limp Bizkit, new country star now that Taylor has transformed.
They're working on it. It's not always guaranteed to have an equal level of success. Artists are tested in markets and further support beyond that is essentially earned when they show to be efficient and effective with the resources the go into pushing them

Example . . Rihanna and early Madonna - very similar in marketing plans. Labels don't create an entirely new marketing plan for every artist, they already have established working plans for various artists. They slightly alter these plans to tailor it a bit closer to the artist and then they give it a try.

Katy Perry and Beyonce both make self-esteem pop . . but they can both be marketed to two different markets . . but because of the similarity between their content they can easily overlap

Fetty Wap worked . . . they're still devising a way to package Young Thug for a wider audience . . and a whole lot of effort is going into that

There is an effect of "star power" - is the general publish really going to believe in what you're selling them . . but manufacturing is involved
 
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,582
Reputation
420
Daps
7,136
Reppin
NULL
Do y'all really think Young Thug thought of his name himself or was it given to him by Lyor or some other industry scumbag?
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,649
Reputation
3,666
Daps
108,747
I disagree with some of this. Rihannas is levels more talented than Britney Spears first of all. To say she has no talent is kind of absurd. The fact that she's extremely pretty and west Indian helps a lot towards her world wide appeal. Like dude said the powers that be couldn't turn just anybody into a mega star. Look at Tierra Marie. Gorgeous and also was on Def Jam yet she's lucky if she could make it big in porn at this point. Also I don't think live performance ability really matters for a pop artist like Rihanna. Her fans don't give a fukk. These sheep wouldn't even know if she lipsynced every word of every song. Did I mention she's attractive? Like an Adele could actually eat in the pop world? Hahahaha not a chance. The power behind these big acts obviously is a huge factor but they do need to find the right "puppet" first
Rihanna is the most talented talentless person sans Kim Kardashian. However, Rihanna has a star quality that you can't teach. It's innate. Rihanna was going to model or marry rich regardless.
 
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,582
Reputation
420
Daps
7,136
Reppin
NULL
Rihanna is the most talented talentless person sans Kim Kardashian. However, Rihanna has a star quality that you can't teach. It's innate. Rihanna was going to model or marry rich regardless.
I agree with the innate star power piece but if the first part were true then they could make Kim Kardashian into a global music superstar and that's clearly not the case.
 

Mac Casper

@adonnis - pull up, there's refreshments
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
18,792
Reputation
-1,991
Daps
22,596
Reppin
Love
Do y'all really think Young Thug thought of his name himself or was it given to him by Lyor or some other industry scumbag?

there's an artist in the Bay Area that an individual I know of was involved in trying to launch . . . almost a complete opposite of a situation - where as

"Young Thug" is a term that could be used as a connotation in the Atlanta gay communities (thug is a certain type of gay male)

the artist this individual in San Francisco tried to launch, in a very manufactured way, was called "(insert adjective here) Stud" - a term used for a certain type of gay female

. . so ya . . it can go either way but it wouldn't be unheard for someone to be given their name . . especially by the interests who seek to invest in the branding of said name
 
Top