Miggy won MVP because voters are dumb. Miggy is a slightly better hitter, Trout is significantly better at every other facet of the game

Miggy won MVP because voters are dumb. Miggy is a slightly better hitter, Trout is significantly better at every other facet of the game

No. His best year was when he had a .609 OBP which is the most ridiculous stat of all time when you think about it. He did have 101 RBIs though so I was wrong that he didn't break the 100 RBI total mark, but regardless, the RBIs weren't what made his season historically the best of all time. It was his OBP and isolated power numbers which are out of this world
the argument is you purposefully using the qualifyer of (slightly) in order to LITERALLY slight Miguel Cabrera. He is DEFINITELY the best hitter in baseball.
No. His best year was when he had a .609 OBP which is the most ridiculous stat of all time when you think about it. He did have 101 RBIs though so I was wrong that he didn't break the 100 RBI total mark, but regardless, the RBIs weren't what made his season historically the best of all time. It was his OBP and isolated power numbers which are out of this world

But a 99 gets you in to harvard and a 95 gets you into Michigan.I'm not slighting him, I understand you're a Tigers fan so you take offense, but he might definitely be the best but he isn't significantly the best. A grade of 99 is DEFINITELY superior to a 95, but it's also just "slightly" better. This is Miguel and Trout as hitters.
Are you slow? I'm not looking at just SLG %, I'm looking at the full stats.
LMAO this nikkaBut a 99 gets you in to harvard and a 95 gets you into Michigan.
Harvard > Michigan.
This is Miguel and Trout as hitters.
LMAO this nikka
when you're talking at that level of hitter the differences matter breh. Its like Bonds and Frank Thomas. Thomas is great, first ballot, one of the GOAT. But then theres barry bonds.My head hurts talking to you
You started off saying that Cabrera's OPS is higher so he's significantly better than Trout as a hitter. I explain to you the flaws of looking at OPS because slugging is an overrated stat. So no, in this argument, you have not demonstrated or explained you're looking at full stats. You're looking at ONE stat and not a very good one. If you were looking at the full stats, you'd conclude, like anyone who is being real would and not bias, is that Cabrera is merely slightly better as a hitter than Trout.

at Tigers fans getting butthurt and negging me. 2012 is pretty clear, spin it however you want thoughOPS is an overrated stats because Slugging percentage is an overrated stat. If I go 4-4 with 4 singles and you go 1-4 with a HR, we have the same slugging percentage, that shyt doesn't tell you the real story of power. Miggy has more power indeed, but it's not to the point where it makes up the gap in defense, base stealing and speed.

But a 99 gets you in to harvard and a 95 gets you into Michigan.
Harvard > Michigan.
This is Miguel and Trout as hitters.


whats his WAR though