Build a New Black Leader

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,529
Daps
25,709
Reppin
L.A
Do we need a leader to lead the lost or do we need to get our shyt together by supporting our families and let a leader be born out of that?
 

Real N Quotes

East Is In The House OMG
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
8,997
Reputation
-1,287
Daps
15,602
So certain revelations have come up recently that made me contemplate taking a more "activist" approach in regards to the current state of the black race in America.

I thought about it heavily... a new civil rights stye renaissance is needed to fight the biggest enemy afflicting the youth especially... themselves.

The self image of young black seems to be scarily negative.

What tools, characteristics and personality type would new generation black leaders need to possess in order to get the ball rolling towards discipline and self respect?

" we trust no black leaders, use the stove to heat us, powdered eggs and government cheeses " :ahh:

knowledge of self and submission to GOD is the key to survival of the black man and woman on Earth
 
Last edited:

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
500
Daps
5,892
Reppin
NULL
Just get out of here bro. Black people would not rally around someone who has spoken against religion so much.



Real shyt though

dap for the vid but black ppl, and everyone in general, need to get their ass out of religion. it's a distraction from what's going on and a tool of manipulation.
 

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
500
Daps
5,892
Reppin
NULL
religion, organized religion is the same thing. man is a social being and when 2 or more ppl are doing something anything they have to get organized. organized religion is inevitable.

man has to come up with something else in place of religion that isn't a distraction.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,224
religion, organized religion is the same thing. man is a social being and when 2 or more ppl are doing something anything they have to get organized. organized religion is inevitable.

man has to come up with something else in place of religion that isn't a distraction.
We've made it this far with religion. It's slightly naive to place human motivations and initiatives on the back of philosophies and concepts. We do things out of greed, jealousy, love or power.

I could write a 17 page essay going HaRD at capitalism and it's flaws when truthfully the problem is wealthy elite and concentration of power based on an increasing wealth gap. IT's not like all the socialist and communist societies are perfect. We get caught up too much in idealism.

All of the great kingdoms of Africa were religious. All of the great Empires in Asia were religious. Man is a social being --- you say it's inevitable... so why is the solution to disregard our natures instead of placing our ideas in the proper perspective. A religious man can be equally effective at moving the masses, Malcolm X and Thomas Sankara, and many others have proved that - correct?
 

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
500
Daps
5,892
Reppin
NULL
malcolm x wasn't effective. part of the reason he wasn't is him using the religious platform. the islam platform is very polarizing. white ppl and many christians black or white or hispanic or whatever just wont fuqq with what he's saying him being islam period. but that's what was culture back then.

among the greats, mlk is placed above x simply because mlk was christian and passive. when really [imo] x is miles ahead of mlk.

i (and many) don't know who thomas sankara is so that's proof he wasn't effective :steviej:. you can also call it ignorance in my part. i don't care.

breaking off from what is culture is not easy.

maybe this religion stuff works for other races. it's just not working for black folks. if it is it's very slow.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,224
malcolm x wasn't effective. part of the reason he wasn't is him using the religious platform. the islam platform is very polarizing. white ppl and many christians black or white or hispanic or whatever just wont fuqq with what he's saying him being islam period. but that's what was culture back then.

i (and many) don't know who thomas sankara is so that's proof he wasn't effective :steviej:. you can also call it ignorance in my part. i don't care.

breaking off from what is culture is not easy.
idk if your ignorant or not....


but you should look up sankara for an fyi. and he was eliminated because he was a threat - just like many others.

Have you listened to many X speeches? Most of the ones he gave and most of the ones people remember weren't about religion. Mature people recognize that religion or non religion, or whatever is a personal choice. If the person is motivating others or having an effect then it shouldn't matter what they believe in.

Isolating people or dissing movements because they even have a religion is also feeding into the divide and conquer as much as anything else.... fyi.

If someone is about economic empowerment, or anything else- then why do u care if they are Buddhist or Baptist?

Anyone who didn't listen to Malcolm x back then wouldn't listen to him now... and ur completely wrong about y blacks rejected him back then. Very few did cuz of Islam. Most did because they were nervous about his message. Others did because they were on the Peaceful protest stuff.. and the CIA and some CAC rejected it because he was

effective.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,224
dr-neil-degrasse-tyson-3.jpg
naw, we don't need a leader.......

but it's funny u made a suggestion.
 

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
500
Daps
5,892
Reppin
NULL
idk if your ignorant or not....


but you should look up sankara for an fyi. and he was eliminated because he was a threat - just like many others.

Have you listened to many X speeches? Most of the ones he gave and most of the ones people remember weren't about religion. Mature people recognize that religion or non religion, or whatever is a personal choice. If the person is motivating others or having an effect then it shouldn't matter what they believe in.

Isolating people or dissing movements because they even have a religion is also feeding into the divide and conquer as much as anything else.... fyi.

If someone is about economic empowerment, or anything else- then why do u care if they are Buddhist or Baptist?

Anyone who didn't listen to Malcolm x back then wouldn't listen to him now... and ur completely wrong about y blacks rejected him back then. Very few did cuz of Islam. Most did because they were nervous about his message. Others did because they were on the Peaceful protest stuff.. and the CIA and some CAC rejected it because he was

effective.
right now we need to get off religion. yes it's brought us this far but to get to the next lvl we need to get off it. anyone that comes with that buddist, baptist, yoga sh1t isn't going to get things done. infact anyone that comes with that sh1t has already boxed themselves in a box before anything.

a leader cannot go around bashing religious ppl. it'd be like someone trying to unite ppl bashing other races. me for example i goes in on ppl i don't give a sh1t. i'm just tired.
or the way those black israelites bash white folks. ppl don't like being exposed and put out there.


i've sat in many churches. baptist churches, protestant churches. i was brought up catholic myself. i've studied the bible. and i've lived this earth from starting from middle class to crashing to the bottom and back up and come to the conclusion that religion will not and does not work. if only i had that time back..
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,123
Reputation
2,621
Daps
67,711
naw, we don't need a leader.......

but it's funny u made a suggestion.
America needs an intellectual to lead, someone who puts education above dropping bombs. Obviously, I meant a leader in general, not a leader for black people
He's smart, but FAR TOO SOFT.
Too soft = too intellectual?
CACs cant participate. Sorry breh.:camby:

:whoa: not trying to call you a cac breh, just trying to be funny..:pachaha:
you know that shyt don't bother me breh :pachaha:
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,224
right now we need to get off religion. yes it's brought us this far but to get to the next lvl we need to get off it. anyone that comes with that buddist, baptist, yoga sh1t isn't going to get things done. infact anyone that comes with that sh1t has already boxed themselves in a box before anything.

a leader cannot go around bashing religious ppl. it'd be like someone trying to unite ppl bashing other races. me for example i goes in on ppl i don't give a sh1t. i'm just tired.
or the way those black israelites bash white folks. ppl don't like being exposed and put out there.


i've sat in many churches. baptist churches, protestant churches. i was brought up catholic myself. i've studied the bible. and i've lived this earth from starting from middle class to crashing to the bottom and back up and come to the conclusion that religion will not and does not work. if only i had that time back..
In this case...


I'll just say that you don't understand the focus or purpose of religion.... religion isn't meant to do any one of the things that ur saying that it can't do... at the same time, it does not box a person in if they want to work towards our goals.

Also, I'm not sure why you believe we need a leader. We simply need to play our parts.... some of us can get information and guidance out there to others, but we don't need someone to be an atheist to lead. And not every religious person bashes all the other religions.
 
Top