Sad to see a black man in the highest realms of power working as a paid whore for white supremacy

Every time I see or hear about this piece of shyt c00n, I think about how Anita Hill got put through the ringer just so he could be complete scum![]()
Sad to see a black man in the highest realms of power working as a paid whore for white supremacy
are you that much in denial...you think he's the only one???are you that much in denial
you are about to get ignored, you dont talk a lot of sense at all
they are all compromised I ask you again do you think he's the only corrupt judge sitting up there...
I'm about to get ignored for telling the truth when bribery is legal in Washington and not against the rules???they are all compromised I ask you again do you think he's the only corrupt judge sitting up there...
![]()
- Shelby County v. Holder (2013): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to strike down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required certain states and local governments with a history of racial discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws. Justice Thomas joined the majority opinion, which argued that the coverage formula was outdated and unconstitutional. Critics argue that the decision has made it easier for states to implement restrictive voting laws that disproportionately impact minority voters, including Black Americans.
- Fisher v. University of Texas (2013 and 2016): In these two related cases, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the University of Texas's affirmative action program, which considered race as one factor among many in its undergraduate admissions process. In both cases, Justice Thomas wrote separate opinions arguing that the use of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Critics argue that his stance could potentially limit opportunities for Black students and other underrepresented minorities in higher education.
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion arguing that the policy was unconstitutional and asserting that the Constitution requires the government to be completely race-neutral. Critics argue that his position would undermine efforts to promote diversity and address historical racial inequalities in education.
You dont think everyone knows that?
The problem here is that you have a black man assigned to the most power court in the United States being flown out and accepting gifts from right neo nazis and white supremacists.
What do you think those gifts and flyouts for? Their health or personal admiration of Thomas???
You should take a look at his judicial record and how often he has sided with anti black positions.
just off of the top of the head

I know alot of what you posted but that's not the specific question I asked you...![]()
Ok... But that's still not the question I asked YOU...I guess what I am saying is that it doesn't fundamentally doesn't matter who else does it. We are talking about Thomas here
which you will not answer...

