Calling leftists intolerant for not tolerating intolerance is just a far-right talking point

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,913
Reputation
9,945
Daps
176,017
Paradox of tolerance. The paradox of tolerance was described by Karl Popper in 1945. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.

Paradox of tolerance - Wikipedia
 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,545
Daps
82,039
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
another “democrats are morally superior” thread :russell:


call people “intolerant” because they think borders should be enforced and dont call weirdos by their preferred pronouns :russell:

Obama is literally a war criminal
Bill Clinton gutted the safety net for many in this country

But go ahead and deflect
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
934
Daps
106,204
Locker Room Quality Posting
another “democrats are morally superior” thread :russell:
Progressive ideals are morally superior, that's just a fact. If that offends you, you're almost certainly a piece of shyt. You also cant come up with a "protec muh borders" argument that doesnt ultimately boil down to good ol fashioned xenophobia and racism.

fukk outta here, fakkit.
 

Sir Charles Barkley

The Chuckster
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
513
Reputation
-230
Daps
1,845
Reppin
TNT & Turner Family
Progressive ideals are morally superior, that's just a fact. If that offends you, you're almost certainly a piece of shyt. You also cant come up with a "protec muh borders" argument that doesnt ultimately boil down to good ol fashioned xenophobia and racism.

fukk outta here, fakkit.

yes or no should a country have borders

edit: used 'fakkit' as slur, possible homophobia detected from 'morally superior and tolerant' leftist.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,102
Reputation
4,485
Daps
89,204
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Progressive ideals are morally superior, that's just a fact. If that offends you, you're almost certainly a piece of shyt. You also cant come up with a "protec muh borders" argument that doesnt ultimately boil down to good ol fashioned xenophobia and racism.

fukk outta here, fakkit.
NjFhmL4.png
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
33,239
Reputation
6,295
Daps
112,255
ok then since you're not a coward, answer the question... yes or no should a country have borders.
a country can have borders, but I dont think people realize that it's just for show. I don't think a border will have a strong effect on immigration. It'll just be a monument for white supremacy. At least, that's what Trump is talking about with his wall. But he doesnt realize it doesnt matter

I dont care for the border one way or another. Immigrants will still get hereregardless. But taxpayers will have to pay for a border that doesnt really change much
 
Top