Calling Trump a criminal is tethering- Tariq Nasheed
- Thread starter Voice of Reason
- Start date
TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?
I walk around a little edgy already
That doesn't make it better. Or should the caller have added "Yes indeed family" to offset the repetition?
People are not allowed to repeat themselves now lest they be called a tether.
IIVI
Superstar
Add them up.
15-20 videos a week at 40k
The Honorablecuts up his Twitter spaces and releases them on You Tube, friend
Those are a lot of the same people watching multiple videos. Folks straight up blowing hours of their time away every month thinking they’re doing something productive2.4 million views per month on the low end.
That doesn't make it better. Or should the caller have added "Yes indeed family" to offset the repetition?
People are not allowed to repeat themselves now lest they be called a tether.
I listened to the snippet and the caller was going overboard with it. He said "Trump's a criminal" about 20x in less than a minute.
And, it's unfortunate, too, because he had a good point but ruined it being excessive.
Those are a lot of the same people watching multiple videos. They straight up blowing hours of their time away every month thinking they’re doing something productive
Whatever floats their boat. I'd rather read a book but if folk want to ingest a stream of negativity that's their prerogative.
COINTELPRO was “a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech an association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence” — The Church Committee
"The first step was infiltration; undercover agents joined organizations, posing as legitimate members, and gathered intelligence on the group’s discourse, aims, and connections. Once embedded in the group, agents would try to push members to be more extreme or violent in pursuing their goals. Agents spread rumors about genuine members, trying to sew internal conflict and get members to splinter the group. Once the word got out that the FBI was infiltrating counter-culture organizations, agents would accuse genuine members of being agents to increase their social status in the group, as well as kick a sincere member out. Agents would try to make organizations appear more extreme to alienate popular support and make them more of a target. Lastly, and most rarely, the FBI used violence, often carried out by local police. For example, Black Panther leader Fred Hampton was murdered by the Chicago Police Department at the behest of the FBI, who apparently could not significantly disable the Black Panthers through other methods."
The bolded is exactly what we watched and are watching happen in real with FBA/ADOS and Tariq. The only question now is are these truly agents/white supremacist who aim to sew discord and damage credibility? Or is the white supremacy programming so strong within them,you now have black men willingly doing the job of white supremacy
#G.M.OTheres no other explanation as to why Tariq would consistently have threads made about him where hes taken out of context,or flat out misquoted like this one.
The aim is to damage his credibility with people so that you will never even listen,and possibly align with what hes saying. This should tell you either hes truly a threat to the Democrats and the status quo. Or deliniation is truly a threat white supracist dont want to see happen for reasons I dont know. On paper the division seems like something they may want. But i could imagine them not wanting it as well,as its a sign of becoming more politically savvy. Ill keep watching the sabatogue for more clues.
Born2BKing
Veteran
3. You run interference for Tariq
null
...
I've probably listened to more tariq, PBT and 'em etc than you.
Tariq has discredited himself.
Saying that I it's not entirely my fight so other opinions might matter more.
The main issue I have is with him stoking up a narrative which is dangerous and incorrect.
I am already delineated from FBA/ADOS. It is that simple. I don't need to bytch about that online for years. I don't need to fight about it.
It is just a fact and the matter has already been settled
.I called what tariq is doing "STRUGGLE DELINEATION"
. More about year long moaning and fighting rather than just taking 5 mins to do it and then getting on with more important enemies.
I've probably listened to more tariq, PBT and 'em etc than you.
Tariq has discredited himself.
Saying that I it's not entirely my fight so other opinions might matter more.
The main issue I have is with him stoking up a narrative which is dangerous and incorrect.
I am already delineated from FBA/ADOS. It is that simple. I don't need to bytch about that online for years. I don't need to fight about it.
It is just a fact and the matter has already been settled
I called what tariq is doing "STRUGGLE DELINEATION"
More about year long moaning and fighting rather than just taking 5 mins to do it and then getting on with more important enemies.
If youve listened as much as me then you know Tariq has value. And you know what Tariq says has at least SOME truth to it. So why would other black people attempt to completely discredit someone that does have value, and does bring truth?
I completely agree with Tariqs "narrative" on Democrats and thank him for being at the forefront. It needeed to be said and will pay dividends in the longterm if done right. I also agree on dileniation,as well as bringing tethering to the table. We have been getting the unfair credit for alot of c00ns that arent black Americans. So that distinction is a very important one.
Where i part ways is him allowing his online movement to be hijacked by xenophobes and probably a few undercover white supremacist. Because i believe as an online persona he gets paid based on engagement. So hes allowed the loudest most polarizing audience members a microphone in order to upset other populations and bring views.
But if hes truly about dileniation,he probably doesnt care about alienating other groups. This would just purely be an ideological disagreement. We had those during the civil rights movement. Would it have been right for black people to actively try to discredit everything Malcolm X or Dr King was saying? Simply because they disagreed on the matter of violence vs non violence? No it wouldnt be okay,they would be agent activity imo. Like many of these coli posters are with Tariq and other black conscience voices.
Tariq needing a counter balance,doesnt mean hes not credible or holds no value. Blame all these people so angry at him for not buying there own podcast mics.
The problem with us is that we get so emotional on one issue,that we like to completely ruin other black men. And completely throw out the entire baby with the bath water. When truthfully even the placenta has nutrients
