Can anybody please explain why you never hear people say" what abt White on white crime"

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,165
Reputation
10,380
Daps
225,540
The only person who got exposed here is YOU. Your arguments are fukking pathetic. You got destroyed time and time again and could only respond by asking people if they were White. What a joke. Hold your L.

Nah, I didn't get destroyed at all . It's actually pretty easy to counter and challenge white supremacist talking points. :manny:
 

DynamoEAR

All Star
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
3,714
Reputation
550
Daps
11,198
Reppin
Houston/ATL
Nah, I didn't get destroyed at all . It's actually pretty easy to counter and challenge white supremacist talking points. :manny:
Why are you wasting your time in here dude? People do not want to be saved. Black folks believing in the same violent pathology about themselves is a 100 year old plus ideology, you might as well leave it alone B.:yeshrug:
 

Crayola Coyote

Superstar
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
27,167
Reputation
2,460
Daps
62,235
I already know you LOW IQ brothers who'd rather thrown epitets about cac this and whitey man this.

Do not want to hear the truth or any logic that requires more than a 30 IQ level. LOL

But try this. Take all of the blacks killings in ONLY Chicago, Baltimore, New Orleans and Detroit. Add all of them up and it will be MORE killings than any or ALL WHITE CITIES in AMERICA combined!!!!

That is why black on black crime is criticized!

Matter of fact you couldn't name ONE white city that has the murder rate (of white on white murders) that COMES REMOTELY CLOSE TO the murders in Chicago.


Ladies and Gentleman, that is why black on black crime is focused or criticized. It is because the problem is way WAYYYYYY worse!

The amazing thing about you low IQ folks. No one here will dispute what I said with facts and figures.

All yall will do is cac this and super cac that. And here is a smiley and here is another smiley.

Please Coli one time SURPRISE me and argue using intellect and logic!

"Low IQ" come on, white guy..

:mjlol:
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
26,695
Reputation
3,647
Daps
60,952
This thread exposed a lot of people on here :sas2:


I'm really amazed that these cacs in here think they deserve a pat on the back for having a 40yr break from being the most violent people in America...after centuries of perpetual violence :dwillhuh:

We're talking about people that literally murdered and destroyed just about everyone not white in site. But have the nerve to point the finger at a rape victim that still lives with it's rapist and saying "blacks are messed up in the head"

:childplease:
 

yyy

All Star
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
990
Reputation
1,125
Daps
4,808
To understand this phenomenon you have to first understand how black on black crime becomes a part of the discussion. Let's run through the prototypical situation. A black person is killed/harassed by a cop. Black people get angry and demand that the police treat them with respect. Furthermore, Black people extrapolate that situation and say that the U.S. is still racist (which it is). The accusation that America is still racist makes White people defensive. In an attempt to win the argument, White people then decide to attack the argument that Black people are making, not head on by addressing their claims of police brutality but rather from the side by saying, "If you really cared about Black lives, then you would be more concerned about Black on Black crime rather than Police brutality because Black on Black crime affects more Black people than Police brutality."

The people who use the "Black on Black crime" argument will never say that police brutality does not exist because the proof is in the pudding. What they will do though, is claim that Black people are more focused on the last vestiges of racism rather than truly bettering their community. You see, at the root of the "Black on Black crime" argument is the fundamental belief that the cause for Black people's troubles is themselves rather than America as a whole. Now that you understand why some White Americans raise the Black on Black crime argument, hopefully you can understand why the phrase "White on White crime" will never become a socially acceptable phrase. In America, White America = America. If there were high rates of crime among White people, the media would just say that the entire country has a crime problem.

While people who bring up black on black crime say that their doing it out of the compassion they feel for African-Americans one only has to look at the context of when they bring it up to understand their true motives. What I mean by that is if a White person bought up Black on Black crime randomly and said something along the lines of "The crime rates in Black America are sky high. As a society and a Country we need to do a better job of providing them economic opportunity because crime will spring up in areas where their is no hope." Instead, though, most people who bring up Black on Black crime only bring it up to turn the discussion away from Police Brutality. A healthy functioning country that has moved beyond the great stumbling block of race would have many people who were doing the former and few people doing the latter.
 

Zardoz

mmmmmmmmmmlli
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
1,456
Reputation
355
Daps
4,969
Not surprised to see who are arguing against the OP.
 

y2flyy

Banned
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
215
Reputation
-2,050
Daps
264
Reppin
NULL
To understand this phenomenon you have to first understand how black on black crime becomes a part of the discussion. Let's run through the prototypical situation. A black person is killed/harassed by a cop. Black people get angry and demand that the police treat them with respect. Furthermore, Black people extrapolate that situation and say that the U.S. is still racist (which it is). The accusation that America is still racist makes White people defensive. In an attempt to win the argument, White people then decide to attack the argument that Black people are making, not head on by addressing their claims of police brutality but rather from the side by saying, "If you really cared about Black lives, then you would be more concerned about Black on Black crime rather than Police brutality because Black on Black crime affects more Black people than Police brutality."

The people who use the "Black on Black crime" argument will never say that police brutality does not exist because the proof is in the pudding. What they will do though, is claim that Black people are more focused on the last vestiges of racism rather than truly bettering their community. You see, at the root of the "Black on Black crime" argument is the fundamental belief that the cause for Black people's troubles is themselves rather than America as a whole. Now that you understand why some White Americans raise the Black on Black crime argument, hopefully you can understand why the phrase "White on White crime" will never become a socially acceptable phrase. In America, White America = America. If there were high rates of crime among White people, the media would just say that the entire country has a crime problem.

While people who bring up black on black crime say that their doing it out of the compassion they feel for African-Americans one only has to look at the context of when they bring it up to understand their true motives. What I mean by that is if a White person bought up Black on Black crime randomly and said something along the lines of "The crime rates in Black America are sky high. As a society and a Country we need to do a better job of providing them economic opportunity because crime will spring up in areas where their is no hope." Instead, though, most people who bring up Black on Black crime only bring it up to turn the discussion away from Police Brutality. A healthy functioning country that has moved beyond the great stumbling block of race would have many people who were doing the former and few people doing the latter.

Excellent post Primetime. easily the best in this thread thus far. I agree largely with everything except you alluding that if white on white crime was a bigger issue, the media would not call it a white problem but an American problem.

You might be right about that, who knows. But on issues that spring up and disproportionally affect white americans. The media does describe it as a white issue. The big issue with Heroin over the last few years comes to mind.

I've seen dozens of stores (60 minutes, 20/20, etc...) that called out the white community over the new widespread Heroin problem in middle white America.

So I think they would if the white on white crime also took off to unprecedented levels.
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
58,586
Reputation
24,590
Daps
288,741
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
I think it's wise that I stop chasing a moving goalpost as well. This smoke and mirrors act doesn't deter from the fact that blacks are more violent than any other race in America, so you still lose this argument simply based on your choice of topic... :russ:
That didn't take long:mjpls:
 
Top