see your problem is thinking moderates are indifferent. most of the time moderates just don't fully believe that one side has all the answers.A person can disagree with me and not be stupid.
I hate neo-Nazis, and they are of course idiots of the highest order, but at least they are clear on who they are enemies of and what they stand for. I prefer that to a moderate's indifference or ignorance. The latter group actually helps create an environment in which the former can gain a foothold and thrive because they muddy the waters of political understanding and action.
Also, when I say "moderate," I'm talking about someone who thinks the answer always or usually lies in the middle between two positions at the poles. I don't mean someone who is in reality undecided on a group of issues.
I stand by my original point that moderates fall into three groups: a) indifferent, b) ignorant, and c) scared to take a stand. They may also lack principles, which I suppose would fall under group A.
and the fact that you think that someone that doesn't agree with you is an "enemy" already shows your "radical" or "extremist" positioning.

. The latter group actually helps create an environment in which the former can gain a foothold and thrive because they muddy the waters of political understanding and action.
What's the "moderate" position on people threatening to kill or imprison their political opponents, threatening armed insurrection if an election doesn't go their way, threatening to silence the press, and sending brownshirts after anyone who criticizes you via Twitter?
Radical.
When did Hillary encourage her frumpy middle aged white women supporters to do the insane shyt Trump encouraged his fans to do?
damn.... /thread.... and i wasn't one that was totally on board to what you were saying earlier..... but i can't argue against this.....