"The concerns and interests of slaveholders and slaves & abolitionists are equally valid and deserving of consideration. Can we find a compromise that works for everyone?"
- moderate in 1855


"The concerns and interests of slaveholders and slaves & abolitionists are equally valid and deserving of consideration. Can we find a compromise that works for everyone?"
- moderate in 1855


If you stand for nothing what will you fall for? - Alexander HamiltonSounds like some shyt straight out of a neo-Nazi playbook.
Fortunately for us, American politics are not controlled by an on or off switch.
American politics are not required to take an all or nothing approach. It is the flawed human reactions that are responsible


So not standing for one extreme or the other is standing for nothing now??If you stand for nothing what will you fall for? - Alexander Hamilton![]()
So not standing for one extreme or the other is standing for nothing now??
Not having a refined political ideology is essentially standing for nothing. This "moderate" you describe is passive to issues where people can't afford to sit on the fence, thus they lack conviction.
Nah, you dudes have it backwards.Not having a refined political ideology is essentially standing for nothing. This "moderate" you describe is passive to issues where people can't afford to sit on the fence, thus they lack conviction.
Standing for truth and accountability>>>blindly following someone regardless of what they doIf you stand for nothing what will you fall for? - Alexander Hamilton![]()
Nah, you dudes have it backwards.
Politicians are trying to sway the votes of the moderates. They know they have their zealots behind them regardless. Moderates are the only ones that hold these ppl accountable. The extreme it's on each sides don't really care about the issues as much as they care about their side winning. It's fukking crazy.
The world needs more moderates. They need ppl that aren't easily swayed by flashing lights and fancy slogans
" and vote for them. They don't have a nuanced political stance and thus can be manipulated ala Trump.Standing for truth and accountability>>>blindly following someone regardless of what they do
Sounds more like a fukkin cult

No, your problem is thinking moderates are passive. You are confused. Being wish washy with picking a party to vote for is NOT the same as being wishy washy with actual policies you believe in.Blindly following and being swayed by a charismatic politician is why moderates are so easily exploited. Historically, moderates have been the worst groups of people because they just follow the masses, all it takes is a popular candidate and some moderate fool will be like "" and vote for them. They don't have a nuanced political stance and thus can be manipulated ala Trump.
People that have a well thought out political ideology don't follow politicians at all, they remain true to their political beliefs and if a politician represents their political ideology then they vote for them. Historically, it's been the "extremists" those with a secure political position that stood up oppression.
The passive nature of a moderate is a dangerous thing, saying they stand up to zealots and hold people accountable is blatantly wrong.
But you're not following what someone's telling you to do, you hold a personal ideology that you follow. If anything, those with a defined political stance that is rational and for the benefit of humanity are the best types of people![]()