Can you solve this riddle?

[Blackrogue]

I get the angle but in my opinion the 100 did not return. You took 100 that I could have used for something. You also took 70 with of goods that I could have sold.

There is no profit for the owner, you bought the goods with my money

What if you stole the 100 and stole goods?

I respectfully disagree, so no explaining needed for me

whats the number you are saying the owner lost?

 

[Blackrogue]

I get the angle but in my opinion the 100 did not return. You took 100 that I could have used for something. You also took 70 with of goods that I could have sold.

There is no profit for the owner, you bought the goods with my money

What if you stole the 100 and stole goods?

I respectfully disagree, so no explaining needed for me

maybe this is why this riddle is trending because sensible people like you can;t see how in essence its a simple 100 dollars that got lost. Take your time and think about it because that is the answer. Several people have given the reason on various methods including accounting methods. I've posted a video. The answer is 100. Now wrap your head around how that happened because that is the answer.

The first incidence was the loss. The rest of the info is fluff and a legit transaction that only transposes the loss. But the loss remains the same.