Candace Owens message to FBA

[Sccit]

She ain't "coming home". This is all about her fight with Ben Shapiro and diving further into her already present anti-semitism. All those conservative talking heads are trying to be the lead commentator in the wake of Charlie Kirk's death and she's in the lead. What's really funny is Shapiro hired her when he knew she was anti-semetic but didn't care because at the time she was pro-Israel and anti-black. Now that she's turning on Israel he's trying to deal with the monster he helped create. I hope they all destroy themselves for engaing in this hateful rhetoric and spreading it to the masses just to make money.

SHE ONLY BECAME ANTI-SEMITIC IN THE PAST COUPLE YEARS OR SO

 

[omnifax]

SHE ONLY BECAME ANTI-SEMITIC IN THE PAST COUPLE YEARS OR SO

Lol, if past couple of years you mean 2019. She made those statements about hitler back then man. I do think her british husband has been empowering her anti-semitism in the background, especially as of late.

 

[Bugzbunny129]

She aint wrong in a way

Jews use immigration of others to take the heat off them because for years they caught all the heat. The whole white vs black fight is controlled by them at its core.

 

[omnifax]

She aint wrong in a way

Jews use immigration of others to take the heat off them because for years they caught all the heat. The whole white vs black fight is controlled by them at its core.

Do you have some examples of how the jews control the white vs black fight? As far as I know it a large portion of europe's colonial history was driven by expansion and greed not necessarily by race. Race as we observe it today was created here in the united states primarily as a tactic to break up solidarity among the non elites. Hell the united states as a colonial project was the british wanting to get rid of their poor and indigent and put them to work in the colonies for the benefit of the rich landowners and to fuel industry back in england.

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

You’re genealogically wrong, your mind has just been wired to hold a position that it’s seeking to defend when presented with new information that may contradict that position

What does a white Jewish person’s driver’s license say?

 

[Why-Fi]

I'd fukk her and she defends Michael Jackson... thats all I have to say about that.

she gave shmuli the business over MJ among other things. when they debated, he was trying to use the exact same talking points i see in this thread

his whole opening was about how black ppl should be hating candace owens. but ye said it best

 

[Sccit]

What does a white Jewish person’s driver’s license say?

IM MIZRAHI JEW BUT MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS SAY "OTHER"

 

[Ski Mask]

You do know WS say the same thing, doesn't mean theyre coming over to our side. Please be picky with your info sources, cause a flip flopper shouldnt impress you like this.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

COMMERCIAL DNA TESTING IS NOT BANNED, IT IS REGULATED BY GOVERNMENT FOR LEGAL PURPOSES SUCH AS PATERNITY TESTING ETC

When I say DNA testing, I am referring to testing for lineage or genealogy. Not sure if these ancestry tests are banned in all the countries that you named, but even if they are, why is Israel one of them? I can understand privacy concerns, but doesn’t Israel have a religious component to why these tests are prohibited?

 

[The Pledge]

Who's Caucasian baby is that?

 

[Sccit]

When I say DNA testing, I am referring to testing for lineage or genealogy. Not sure if these ancestry tests are banned in all the countries that you named, but even if they are, why is Israel one of them? I can understand privacy concerns, but doesn’t Israel have a religious component to why these tests are prohibited?

BECAUSE THESE TESTS CAN BE USED FOR PATERNITY TESTS ETC.

SO IN THOSE COUNTRIES, THOSE KINDA TESTS ARE REGULATED BY LAW

THERE IS NO RELIGION OR ETHNIC COMPONENT TO IT WHATSOEVER

 

[Wiseborn]

How “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” Has Been Debunked​

1. It Misrepresents Sources​

The book often quotes real historical documents out of context to exaggerate Jewish involvement in slavery.

• Individual Jewish names are highlighted while Christian and state-run institutions are minimized or ignored.
• When historians examine the same sources in full, they do not support the book’s conclusions.

Multiple scholars have reviewed its citations and found that the evidence does not match the claims being made.

---

2. It Ignores Proportions and Scale​

Serious historical research shows:

• Jews made up a tiny fraction of slave traders in the Atlantic world.
• The slave trade was dominated by European governments, royal charter companies, and Christian merchantsfrom Britain, Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands.
• Jewish communities were small, often poor, and legally restricted during this period.

Highlighting a handful of Jewish individuals while ignoring the overwhelming majority is statistical manipulation, not honest history.

---

3. It Promotes Collective Guilt​

The book treats Jews as a unified group acting together, which is a hallmark of antisemitic thinking.

• Jews are portrayed as secretly coordinated and disproportionately powerful.
• This mirrors classic antisemitic myths used for centuries in Europe to justify persecution.

Historians emphasize that individual participation ≠ group responsibility — a basic rule of historical analysis the book violates repeatedly.

---

4. It Has Been Rejected by Professional Historians​

Mainstream historians — including Black, Jewish, and non-Jewish scholars — have publicly criticized the book.

Examples include:

• Henry Louis Gates Jr., who called the claims misleading and inflammatory
• David Brion Davis, one of the most respected historians of slavery, who rejected the book’s conclusions
• Academic reviews showing it fails basic standards of historical methodology

There is no credible academic consensus supporting the book’s thesis.

---

5. It Serves an Ideological, Not Educational, Purpose​

The book emerged in a political context where:

• Blame for slavery was redirected away from empires and institutions
• Jews were positioned as a scapegoat
• Historical complexity was flattened into a conspiracy narrative

This doesn’t help Black history or Jewish history — it distorts both.

---

​

“The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” has been debunked because it:

• Cherry-picks evidence
• Ignores historical scale and context
• Promotes collective guilt
• Aligns with long-standing antisemitic tropes
• Is rejected by credible historians

Understanding slavery honestly means confronting state power, colonialism, and economic systems, not blaming one marginalized group.

Im not saying if the book is factual or not Im saying that shes regurgitating old Information from the 90s.

 

[Sccit]

Im not saying if the book is factual or not Im saying that shes regurgitating old Information from the 90s.

NO DOUBT

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

IM MIZRAHI JEW BUT MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS SAY "OTHER"

What does your driver’s license say?

 

[Sccit]

What does your driver’s license say?

CALI DOESNT DISPLAY RACE ON DRIVERS LICENSE

MY DRIVING CITATIONS SAY "O" UNDER RACE