Thats all it usually is. No one is bothered by them using lyrics if its detailing an actual crime that they are under investigation for, committed and spoke about. But what they actually are doing is using lyrics that have nothing to do with anything they are investigated for and have no way to authenticate the occurrence of being real or corroborate any connection of it. This is what people that believe lyrics shouldnt be allowed to use as evidence mean. These other people that think they should are being obtuse on how this will actually be used.ok I actually read the last 2 slides…this is overkill just to prove a gun possession charge…I thought they were actually connecting bodies to this idiot…this is more so theatrics
Thats like getting arrested for driving on a suspended license because the state saw you rapping "Smokin' while I'm drivin' that's with no L's, nikka" as actual evidence. (not exactly but you get it)

the muhfukka has bar after bar about Black men that were seriously murdered and you're talking about cacs

the fukk are you even talking about. One minute we're rooting for racist cacs going after Black men, the next it's "not all black men"