Joe Budden
Banned
Mods can we give OPs spot to a new poster?

Mods can we give OPs spot to a new poster?
Am I only one who had to look up what neoliberal means?![]()
Usually a term someone uses when they are on they are struggling with something and are on the defensive.
Elliot Rodgers had his ish together and still got no buns
Women are making their own money nowadays, they going for dudes they find sexually attractive.
This whole sentence right here tells me why you don't get no bytches...
So women don’t give p*ssy to men who are defined by what they own?But the whole point is to…gain possessions
so if that’s the case why not fukk broke men with good hearts? And shouldn’t men just be proud of that instead of stressing over money?
This nikka thinks living in a socialist society will improve his chances of getting a job and getting bytches. If you ain’t shyt in a capitalist country you won’t be shyt in any other society. Imagine depending on this nikka to pull his weight so the whole village can eat. Everyone gon starve
Its very simple: live a life you are happy with. If the women around you aren't impressed by that lifestyle, that is not your problem.
Get your car, get your house, be healthy and strengthen your bonds with people that are good to you and reciprocate the consideration you show them.
I've got a lifestyle that I'm happy with, I'm not willing to get bent out of shape trying to modify it for a woman. If shes cool with my lifestyle and has something similar going then great. If not, then that's fine too. If you have to choose between a peaceful existence and getting cheeks the answer should be obvious.
Contrary to popular belief on here and the manosphere, broke men get a lot of the women because they have time for a lot of women. Money raises the quality of women but not the amount. Another thing, majority of women are around 5 and 6 range so they’re usually in the lower rung and that’s who the pookie and ray rays as they say be clapping cheeks with. People conflated 1990s and early 2000s rap videos with reality.I hear this around a lot. The whole “work on your purpose”, “make a lot of money”, “get rich”, “get an overpriced loft apartment in a metropolitan city”, “get an entry level luxury car”, etc.
But does that really actually change shyt in regards to casual sex?
Because logically, it seems like it all comes down to time and logistics.
In other words: 1. being around women 2. having the time to be around them
And it seems like the whole “be on your purpose” capitalist neoliberal self development track is the antithesis to both of those things.
Unless you’re starting a salon, you’ll most likely be around men in your financial pursuits. And since you’re so focused on whatever meaningless task meant to distract you, you’ll have LESS time to spend with women.
So brehs, think critically about your experiences and what you’ve witnessed. Do you actually have sex with more women when you’re “on the grind”? Or is this just a delusion meant to justify the time you’ve spent on these pursuits?
Which one is it: oochie wally or one mic?
ExpoundAny woman coming to you is not a woman you want. Good luck man.
EtherThis nikka thinks living in a socialist society will improve his chances of getting a job and getting bytches. If you ain’t shyt in a capitalist country you won’t be shyt in any other society. Imagine depending on this nikka to pull his weight so the whole village can eat. Everyone gon starve