Child Support card that can only be spent on the child; Women are against it

[blackzeus]

I don't have kids but from my understanding getting nikkas to even pay that shyt is a struggle and then they don't pay that much or in full

There is no true value you can put on caring for a child.....it's priceless. nikkas aL ready get the luxury of maintaining their lives and body as is once the baby comes out....like fatherhood borderline optional motherhood borderline mandatory

fukk em, if all involved decided as a man the courts need to tell you how to spend on your child then the fukk would make these nikkas think they have a say in how the money spent

If she spent her last paying daycare and oh boy is two weeks late for the support...well daycare already paid. ...maybe mama car note needs that money now. ..let the person RAISING the child control the money for the child

If you didn't marry her....then you contributed your sperm.....now do the same with your money and sit the fukk down

Why do you get to raise the child and not the man who can actually financially support him?

 

[blackzeus]

Seems like this topic is dear to our hearts

 

[Reginald Noble]

as a national program, it won't ever be accepted. it's intrusive and costly to even try to enforce.
on an individual level, only using it for clothing four times a year? can't use it towards bills? as many have stated, a part of rearing a child involves shelter, electricity, water (washing their clothes). can i buy junior's plane ticket with it? can i put gas in the car because i drive them to school and that's completely out of the way for work? what about their extracurricular activities, can we pay the karate teacher with this card?

it's a babysitting program suggested because people suspect that they can't/shouldn't trust the mother (or father) of their child. if there were things that this card didn't cover, but were still for the child, many noncustodial parents wouldn't help make the difference up because they already pay child support. but the money would be inaccessible

If you think it's intrusive, try being the father who 1/2 the time didn't even want a baby now he got money coming out of his check. Now I don't care what you say on this - That Woman could have found a Man who actually wanted a damn child.

Now assuming he wanted the baby - How many times a year you need clothing? My mother took me twice a year. You trying to win a child beauty pageant or some shyt?

No dammit no bills. Con Edison or Texas Electric whatever it's called where you live - That's your responsibility as the adult. You'd be paying rent and utilities regardless. Now if you had 3 kids and need a 2 bedroom or larger that's on you for letting that Man impregnate you that many times.

Plane tickets for vacations can be negotiated outside of the child support. Lower the money that comes out of the man's check and he can optionally give you money on the side for that kind of stuff. Vacations are not a necessity.

Yes for extra-curriculars the legislators will promote this to the YMCAs, Gyms etc. to be able to use the card for kids programs after school and babysitting. There can be a baby-sitting app where the sitter can take payment from the CS card.

so ultimately, it's the noncustodial parent who has the final say in how the money is spent. there is no consistency. some in here believe that money can go towards utilities (which the child contributes to) and others don't. you're at the mercy of what the noncustodial parent believes. not the needs of the house where the child is living.

It's his money so yes. It should be spent on the child. Because at the end of the day most Fathers want custody anyways and most Mothers are not doing a good job right now. If they were there would be less young Black males on the block corner. A young man especially needs his father but so does his daughter. They need to be around a Man to know how Men should treat them.

Maybe young the child can stay with the Mother but around the age of puberty the Father should have custody and ensure proper discipline is adhered to and they focus on their future whether it be college, trades or entrepreneurship.

Joint custody would remove this problem altogether and have NO child support but that will never happen in CAC Feminist Amerikkka

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

as a national program, it won't ever be accepted. it's intrusive and costly to even try to enforce.
on an individual level, only using it for clothing four times a year? can't use it towards bills? as many have stated, a part of rearing a child involves shelter, electricity, water (washing their clothes). can i buy junior's plane ticket with it? can i put gas in the car because i drive them to school and that's completely out of the way for work? what about their extracurricular activities, can we pay the karate teacher with this card?

it's a babysitting program suggested because people suspect that they can't/shouldn't trust the mother (or father) of their child. if there were things that this card didn't cover, but were still for the child, many noncustodial parents wouldn't help make the difference up because they already pay child support. but the money would be inaccessible

fukk that! There was once a world without gas stations, cash registers, POS registers, etc. we can adjust by implementation.

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

This is why I am moving to S.E. Asia. The RISUG procedure for reversible vasectomy is being perfected in India. There is also a herb called genderussa that makes sperm immobile and causes virtually no side effects. It has finished clinical trials in Indonesia. The birth rate there is now what it's supposed to be.

Asia is at the forefront of progress. Amerikkka going backwards giving Women too much power.

The CACs want Black Women to remain in charge. fukk that nikka, trail blaze in a place where you can call the shots.

 

[hatechall]

@Yup is a white troll

I wish that was true, but it's probably not. Black men need to realize that a lot of black women view them as worthless pieces of shyt.

Don't be fooled by all their pro-black talk, and all that loyalty talk. They've been brainwashed to hate their race just as much as black men have.

 

[GarnetGem]

If you think it's intrusive, try being the father who 1/2 the time didn't even want a baby now he got money coming out of his check. Now I don't care what you say on this - That Woman could have found a Man who actually wanted a damn child.

Now assuming he wanted the baby - How many times a year you need clothing? My mother took me twice a year. You trying to win a child beauty pageant or some shyt?
children grow at different rates. they can also wear out clothes through rough play. items can be lost, destroyed or stolen. if the custodial parent uses an entire check on clothes for the child. it's still for the child.

No dammit no bills. Con Edison or Texas Electric whatever it's called where you live - That's your responsibility as the adult. You'd be paying rent and utilities regardless. Now if you had 3 kids and need a 2 bedroom or larger that's on you for letting that Man impregnate you that many times. a part of caring for children involves bathing them and washing their laundry. there are periods in life where children are messy eaters, and even bedwetters. so the water bill may be a bit high one month.

Plane tickets for vacations can be negotiated outside of the child support. Lower the money that comes out of the man's check and he can optionally give you money on the side for that kind of stuff. Vacations are not a necessity. travel isn't a necessity? if the kid is going, shouldn't it automatically be approved? what about a cellphone for your minor child? and you've finally revealed what you really think this will impact, the amount of money taken from the noncustodial parent. again, you proclaim that this will make the whole system simpler, but there are all these extra hoops that the custodial parent has to jump through in order to beg for more money. you're at the mercy of the noncustodial parent. and that isn't equitable nor fair.

Yes for extra-curriculars the legislators will promote this to the YMCAs, Gyms etc. to be able to use the card for kids programs after school and babysitting. There can be a baby-sitting app where the sitter can take payment from the CS card. so much extra legislation when states are cutting their budgets. if there's extra money on the cs card at the end of the month, what happens to it?



It's his money so yes. It should be spent on the child. Because at the end of the day most Fathers want custody anyways and most Mothers are not doing a good job right now. If they were there would be less young Black males on the block corner. A young man especially needs his father but so does his daughter. They need to be around a Man to know how Men should treat them. "it's his money, so yes, it should be seen how HE sees fit." god help the custodial parent whose partner doesn't believe that children affect the cost of utilities. if the parents disagree, he has veto power right? or can we take this back to court to argue over expenditures that we disagree on? for the second part, that's not about a cs card. that's a different discussion.

 

[GarnetGem]

fukk that! There was once a world without gas stations, cash registers, POS registers, etc. we can adjust by implementation.

i'm not sure what you mean. are you longing for the days of the barter system? cause that's long gone

 

[DLo]

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

i'm not sure what you mean. are you longing for the days of the barter system? cause that's long gone

You missed it. I am referring to we as a society, progressed and implemented things that weren't once there so we can do the same with CS cards.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

I keep hearing about the repercussions for men for having unprotected sex or pick "ain't shyt bytches" but where is the accountability for the women? They can make bad decision after bad decision and never have to change a thing

I guess they're saying hoes/women are meant to be led. They're doing what we as a collection allow them to do. It has validity in that but fukk them hoes. That argument went out the door when women's right entered. So equality, bytch.

But women never wanted equality. They wanted the advantages of cac men but poor and black males in general are getting hit worse with the stray bullets.

 

[jwonder]

just like the welfare system, fraud is negligible. the checks and balances you think will curb it aren't. but i also disagree that it's even going to serve its purpose. the crux of the argument is that the paying parent believes they'll have more influence in how the money is spent. but having the custodial parent having to constantly defend or justify purchases when the child is being taken care of isn't right. it's frustration, not curbing fraud.

No women would agree with it. Most women don't use the money how it's intended

That's why I love living in AZ. They got it right. You only pay child support if you can't do the 50/50 custody. That is what is issued by the court.

That's how it should be. Both parents raising the child. Not the mother and she just gets crazy money each month

 

[EndDomination]

I think it should pay for the child's expenses as well as 1/2 of the rent and utilities.
Considering the child is the one who suffers if 1/2 the rent and utilities can't be paid.
And the child shouldn't get the card at 13, as I don't know a single 13 year old who would use it responsibly.
This is still a good idea though.