You are misconstruing everything. If the child is taken care of and there is an excess of funds that can be put towards a household costs why the hell not?So what the hell is the Mother in the equation for? If she isn't going to take care of the child at home then why isn't the custody granted to me?
I don't think the house, the water nor the electricity is of the concern for the parent required to pay child support. that's unfair. so basically if I don't have custody, I need to pay for everything while the mother ride's for free? LadySimone, that's not fair. what if you were required to pay child support? would you truly feel it's your responsibility to pay for the water and electricity? and don't say "but that's the man's role" because that's not a fair answer.
The child is using amenities...on top of their individal expenses.