audit process definitely means nickel and diming people. why you buying organic veggies? why you buying huggies brand and not general value brand diapers? that's a slippery slope.
Child Support card that can only be spent on the child; Women are against it
- Thread starter BrothaZay
- Start date
Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
jwonder
Superstar
No it wouldn't. It would have to be something outrageous like I stated. Not what you are stating.
LordOfTheManor
Pro
Last edited:
but it does, if you have a card that limits what an adult can buy and then there is a separate auditing committee to check behind the purchases that have been made on the card. that means you don't trust the limits set in the first place. it's essentially saying you don't trust the cardholder. when we start 'inspecting' purchases, committees are gonna naturally start looking at how much was spent, and on what
jwonder
Superstar
This is 2015. There are so many alerts that technology has. Technology does most of the work by pinging certain transactions. Similar to fraud alerts on your credit card. Two things with this. The bird bytch won't get the urge to try to get slick and the needs of the child solely is met. If there is no audit, then they will try to get slick and succeed.
They don't see the picture. They are so hellbent on getting back on women and not what is best for the child. You can tell these dudes dont care about the kids....just coming out victorious.
More empasis should be placed on the right parent to have full custody of the child in the first place.
Second; women should not be given preference for being mothers unless the child is very young. At a certain age....the court should reasses which parent has the child. More emphasis should be placed on joint custodies.
If the father has the child during the summer...the mother gets no child support during that period. If fathers suspect that mothers are misusing the child support they must be granted an investigation on how the money has beeen used by the mother and the mother is forced to provide evidence. Only if requested and only after at least a year of the father being consistent with his payments and honest with his income that he is making. If the father has attempted to be dishonest..request is rejected unless he jas proven that he can fulfill his financial obligations.
Court should delineate what is acceptable to use the money towards with the onus being for the benefit of the child(ie/ some household costs may be acceptable provided the child's immediate needs are met)
Mothers must have a job that enables them to support the child and themselves and child support should remain just that support. Arrangements can be made where instead of child support the father can agree to be solely responsible of certain expenditures.
If the father has remarried and has a new family than child support should be reassessed with the understanding that he has additional dependents. If the mother has the child and has remarried and the stepfather serves as surogate than child support must also be reassessed.
I don't believe men should be sent to jail for going arrears due to child support however, they must pay the child support if it has been court ordered or else their may incur other penalties like their credit...etc...
If a man has years of arrears that he now pays and the mother has been taking care of child without that child support should go towards an account serving to cover his/her education, etc....
A more holistic approach is needed from the court which encourages the father to be an active parent rather than quanitifying it in dollars and cents. Therefore, the court shoudl encourage the use of family counsellors/mediators that can help improve the relationship between the co-parents and the child in coping with the situation.
Last edited:
Still a slippery slope...what you are suggesting can easily be abused and severely.
explain what you mean by this. getting slick means different things to different people. the needs of the child mean different things to people in this thread. succeed at what? spending money?
again, you don't trust her decision making. do you believe that this new system will curb overspending? or do you look at this as a way for the 'powerless' person in the situation to regain some control by exercising influence over approving exactly what the child support is used for?
jwonder
Superstar
New system will benefit the child more than the mother. Too many cases where the mother spends mostly on herself and little on the kid. This may not be 100%, but it will be a million times better than how the situation is now. Slick in the sense of not spending on the child and trying to profit in another. The same way people do with the welfare system. If there is no audit process. It will be all fukked up.
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
breh...i pay a G....and my ex has me headed back to court for more.....
no way in hell is $1000 being spent on my son every month....i KNOW this woman....its going to helping take care of her household...im 41 and i dont spend $1000/mo on myself (not counting bills/debt)
its not my responsibility to take care of another adult....
hoodheronova
All Star
damn you sound rich tho fam. How long before you stacking a million
I'm going to need that male birth control to drop sooner than later.
I literally can't wait, to NOT have to worry about these issues
Male birth control will literally end the unconstitutional CS racket that prevents wealth building.
Reginald Noble
Banned
They know if it only can be used for the child they would end up being evicted and then lose custody.
We already know your game Women.
We already know your game Women.
