Hence the question mark. I'm not memorizing nikkas family trees out here.
Yvette isn't "creating" a divide. The divide is already there, educationally, culturally, economically. All she's doing is 'giving us eyes to see'.
I have a hard enough time being referred to as a descendant of "slaves", I'm definitely not a "nikka"
A financial divide isn't the same as an incendiary one. I'll give her credit for acknowledging that they hsve an advantage of taking their money home and building something for international trade.But that's exactly the problem with European immigrants, we built their ability to do so and yet the attention is brought to Caribbeans. Do you invite the chart I'm talking about? There were at least 6 other groups listed. But who caught the heat? Who skated by when they were the ingress that enslaved us and enforce immigration, business, and trade policy?
Who's at the top of the totem pole again? 


) or an AfrAm being denied a job because they have a "ghetto" name. Look, as much as your inherent bigotry will not allow you to see it, we might have different origins, but we are still black people, and most of the policies that affect AfrAms will also affect other black groups. Stop doing the work of these right-wing groups for them. By the time they stop focusing on us, they'll start focusing on y'all again.
' It is what it is, don't be mad at me for saying it.
Gotta remind people that even though the chart notes there's a difference, we're not the same. Which is why we need a distinction, like the chart gave, so we can stop lumping our situation together with theirs, which again: the chart did, but how are we supposed to build the argument that non ADOS are different if we don't frame it like we're reported the same first? 

