@chris.b along with most christians are going to hell anyway

[Thsnnor]

I've read most of the holy texts in full. I studied religion academically for years (although it was not my main focus). So, yes, I feel qualified to use the scriptures to make claims.



I think you are trolling now. Radicals say a lot of things that have nothing to do with the religion. Why are you using a radical to make a claim? It doesn't make sense to me

Would you consider ISIS radical? They kill many, had christians pay the tax, blown up both mosques and Christian sites. They along said they would blow up the kabal. What have they said that has nothing to do with religion?

 

[kp404]

Personally I believe people research things and not join something because it's the flavor of the month. I know the Textus Receptus is over 99% accurate. I checked the info out myself and not because someone claimed it.

Then you are naive. You ever heard of something called the Boxer Rebellion? Or the Scramble for Africa? or how about the Transatlantic Slave Trade? See in these events (and throughout history in other events), people either converted willingly to religions they knew nothing about or they were forced at gunpoint to do so...even today, people convert to religions without researching on a mass scale...they don't ask questions; hell, we can go more local and look at various cult groups where people join spontaneously...Scientology alone does not allow research into the group or questions...

Don't be naive, breh. people are EXTREMELY ignorant about religion in 2014 aqnd their objectives, motives, and especially, their HISTORY.

 

[Ciggavelli]

Would you consider ISIS radical? They kill many, had christians pay the tax, blown up both mosques and Christian sites. They along said they would blow up the kabal. What have they said that has nothing to do with religion?

Yes, ISIS is radical. They are interpreting the Qu'ran in a certain way. This has nothing to do with whether Christians believe in the same god as muslims.

 

[Thsnnor]

Then you are naive. You ever heard of something called the Boxer Rebellion? Or the Scramble for Africa? or how about the Transatlantic Slave Trade? See in these events (and throughout history in other events), people either converted willingly to religions they knew nothing about or they were forced at gunpoint to do so...even today, people convert to religions without researching on a mass scale...they don't ask questions; hell, we can go more local and look at various cult groups where people join spontaneously...Scientology alone does not allow research into the group or questions...

Don't be naive, breh. people are EXTREMELY ignorant about religion in 2014 aqnd their objectives, motives, and especially, their HISTORY.

If people don't care to look up something before they jump in feet first then that is on them. Many times people are given a choice of convert or die. That is why Christians in Mosul fled before the order took place.

 

[Thsnnor]

Yes, ISIS is radical. They are interpreting the Qu'ran in a certain way. This has nothing to do with whether Christians believe in the same god as muslims.

Actually it does. If you read the koran you would know it said that the people of the book should be judged by the book. What the Bible says is in direct conflict with what mohammed spoke.

 

[Ciggavelli]

Actually it does. If you read the koran you would know it said that the people of the book should be judged by the book. What the Bible says is in direct conflict with what mohammed spoke.

That still has nothing to do with whether they believe in the same god. You are going off on tangents to avoid the question.

 

[kp404]

Actually it does. If you read the koran you would know it said that the people of the book should be judged by the book. What the Bible says is in direct conflict with what mohammed spoke.

because the re-written bible was written for the sole purpose of being "in conflict" with the Qu'ran and people that follow any other religion outside of Christianity...God and religion are supposed to bring people together, not divide them, which is what the re-written Bible does as you just proved in your post.

 

[Thsnnor]

because the re-written bible was written for the sole purpose of being "in conflict" with the Qu'ran and people that follow any other religion outside of Christianity...God and religion are supposed to bring people together, not divide them, which is what the re-written Bible does as you just proved in your post.

The Bible came first and we have texts from the 1st century. If there were changes we would know.

 

[LA Fisher]

The Bible came first and we have texts from the 1st century. If there were changes we would know.

 

[kp404]

The Bible came first and we have texts from the 1st century. If there were changes we would know.

Wait...wait a minute.....let's be clear here what you are saying: Are you saying that the Bible that was written by King James is the same Bible from the 1st century? You realize that's illogical, right? I hope that's not what you are saying because there are TONS of histories about the corruption of the bible writing at the behest of the pope and the corrupt monarchs...that book is nowhere near close to what it was originally

 

[kp404]

Dude is trolling the fukk outta me right now, homie @Thsnnor you can stay naive if it makes you feel safer and happier breh. I won't hate on your "state of mind"

 

[Thsnnor]

Wait...wait a minute.....let's be clear here what you are saying: Are you saying that the Bible that was written by King James is the same Bible from the 1st century? You realize that's illogical, right? I hope that's not what you are saying because there are TONS of histories about the corruption of the bible writing at the behest of the pope and the corrupt monarchs...that book is nowhere near close to what it was originally

Where would you like for me to start. The Textus Receptus? Textus Vaticanus? Latin Vulgate? LXX? Dead Sea Scrolls? Since you know the history of these as well as I do this should be a very easy question.

 

[Slaimon Khan Shah]

First of all the black man is God but your black has nothing but hatred for black queens. Drinking L's and smoking 40's on saturday and in church on sunday. Yall ain't better than anyone else.

There is only One True God, Allah. I invite you to worship him alone without worshiping anything else. Black man is not God.

 

[the cac mamba]

at least @Napoleon can argue a point. @the cac mamba just has juvenile thoughts and opinions that he thinks are profound He's teetering on the line of bigotry too from some of the posts I've seen in HL. He really has an irrational hatred of Muslims. Daps to @Napoleon for hating equally at least

but no one addressed my initial post not ONE mothafukkin poster

including you hoe

and seriously, "daps to naopleon" but you're above this shyt

 

[kp404]

Where would you like for me to start. The Textus Receptus? Textus Vaticanus? Latin Vulgate? LXX? Dead Sea Scrolls? Since you know the history of these as well as I do this should be a very easy question.

Since you have not answered my question, start wherever you like.