Christians create the annoying atheists that they hate so much.

[Thsnnor]

what?

I'm responding to your last question.

 

[thegreatest]

the nerve you have to call me "out" on strawmaning is some other-level, neo in the matrix, stupid motherfukker shyt. OK, let me break it down for you one time, and the don't even mention my name, you small minded fakkit. You asked for it.

Prove this assertion

Why are you asking me to prove what I said can't be proven? fukk outta here . I don't have to fit God into your narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be, just like I don't have to fit him into religion's narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be. You are just as ignorant as the religious people you claim to hate in your attempts to quantify and the unquantifiable.

Sure. This might be true, but atheism says nothing more than you lack belief in god. It doesn't say that god doesn't even exist...merely that theres a lack of evidence.

this is just wrong... oh my god, you really are this dumb

Where is there a word about a lack of evidence? You BELIEVE it, so you feel it is KNOWLEDGE, i.e. you are ASSUMING that he doesn't exist... You just pulled the rest of that out of your ass.. What you described after saying the word ATHEISM is really AGNOSTICISM, which is exactly what I am, you dumb c*nt... I refer to the entirety of being as god and believe that all religions and folk wisdoms point to one and the same thing, which is just that, but of course you wouldn't know that because you've never explored the issue as deeply as I Have, being a lazy and hateful piece of garbage

Theres no greater proof of the judeochristian god being a human creation in noting how human his emotions are

Its like the alien movies where the aliens just look like deformed humans: 4 limbs, bipedal, head, etc.

That's what I just said, retard. Why are you repeating it and acting like you're proving something to me?

except when he does according to you

Uhhh... There is no "according to me". I never said God can be jealous or angry. You inferred I meant something I never said (i.e. strawmanning), please stop, you MUST know on some level how embarrassed I am for you and how intellectually limited everything you say is.

So you're just taking religious concepts and making your own.

Cool. Just admit to it.

I'm not making anything my own, things just are, and god just is, as I said from the very beginning, he cannot be explained. All religions point in the same direction, I don't have to make anything my own or not my own, the main thing is that religions are COORDINATES to the truth, not the truth itself, and that's all I'm saying. Hinduism is so contradictory if you take it literally exactly for that reason - it's not meant to be taken as factual truth. Same with any other religion. They're so confused and clearly fabricated because you're not supposed to take them literally. This is the big human blunder.

Being vague isn't helping you.

if we're not talking about SOMETHING, then we're not talking about ANYTHING.

Everything and nothing are one and the same. They are both part of the infinite isness that is God.

If you want to make better and more convincing arguments, you have to start with the ones YOU make.

I'm not responsible for if your shyt makes sense or not.

Yes, but you're responsible for misinterpreting everything I say and getting worked up about it. I advise you to cool down and stop your crusade against what you perceive to be lies, when anything you believe in - science, morality, knowledge - is just as limited as the God to the extent you understand him, and claim to hate.

If "he" cant be understood then how do you claim to know this?
This is the easiest fukking trick in the book and NO ONE picks up on it

Well, look at it this way. We don't understand how Physics works on its deepest level... But we have enough knowledge to know of our own ignorance. We know that the human emotion of humor is, but we don't know how or why we evolved it. We know it, and yet we are quite ignorant when it comes to understanding it. You see how that works?

Here's another example. I can see you're a misguided, emotional idiot rebelling against something in your personal life that infuriates/infuriated you by lashing out against me and other people who did you no harm, because you're projecting... I know that, and yet I don't understand how you got to be so fukking dumb. See how that is? I can't understand it, and yet I know it. Tadaaaaaa

 

[ThaRealness]

This.

But the idea that people are walking around thinking that anybody who isn't a Christian will go to hell and suffer for eternity does rub me the wrong way, I have to admit.

thats where you have to draw the line. that in group out group mentality is a problem. I imagine alot of modern day Christians dont think non believers go to hell though

 

[Futuristic Eskimo]

Someone post the chart on what Gnosticism and theism actually mean in philosophical terms please. Dudes out here using words they dont understand

 

[Dada]

Pretty much.

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

the nerve you have to call me "out" on strawmaning is some other-level, neo in the matrix, stupid motherfukker shyt. OK, let me break it down for you one time, and the don't even mention my name, you small minded fakkit. You asked for it.



Why are you asking me to prove what I said can't be proven? fukk outta here . I don't have to fit God into your narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be, just like I don't have to fit him into religion's narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be. You are just as ignorant as the religious people you claim to hate in your attempts to quantify and the unquantifiable.




this is just wrong... oh my god, you really are this dumb

Where is there a word about a lack of evidence? You BELIEVE it, so you feel it is KNOWLEDGE, i.e. you are ASSUMING that he doesn't exist... You just pulled the rest of that out of your ass.. What you described after saying the word ATHEISM is really AGNOSTICISM, which is exactly what I am, you dumb c*nt... I refer to the entirety of being as god and believe that all religions and folk wisdoms point to one and the same thing, which is just that, but of course you wouldn't know that because you've never explored the issue as deeply as I Have, being a lazy and hateful piece of garbage




That's what I just said, retard. Why are you repeating it and acting like you're proving something to me?




Uhhh... There is no "according to me". I never said God can be jealous or angry. You inferred I meant something I never said (i.e. strawmanning), please stop, you MUST know on some level how embarrassed I am for you and how intellectually limited everything you say is.



I'm not making anything my own, things just are, and god just is, as I said from the very beginning, he cannot be explained. All religions point in the same direction, I don't have to make anything my own or not my own, the main thing is that religions are COORDINATES to the truth, not the truth itself, and that's all I'm saying. Hinduism is so contradictory if you take it literally exactly for that reason - it's not meant to be taken as factual truth. Same with any other religion. They're so confused and clearly fabricated because you're not supposed to take them literally. This is the big human blunder.



Everything and nothing are one and the same. They are both part of the infinite isness that is God.



Yes, but you're responsible for misinterpreting everything I say and getting worked up about it. I advise you to cool down and stop your crusade against what you perceive to be lies, when anything you believe in - science, morality, knowledge - is just as limited as the God to the extent you understand him, and claim to hate.




Well, look at it this way. We don't understand how Physics works on its deepest level... But we have enough knowledge to know of our own ignorance. We know that the human emotion of humor is, but we don't know how or why we evolved it. We know it, and yet we are quite ignorant when it comes to understanding it. You see how that works?

Here's another example. I can see you're a misguided, emotional idiot rebelling against something in your personal life that infuriates/infuriated you by lashing out against me and other people who did you no harm, because you're projecting... I know that, and yet I don't understand how you got to be so fukking dumb. See how that is? I can't understand it, and yet I know it. Tadaaaaaa

Athiesm is not a belief fukk nikka..

 

[Box Cutta]

If we atheist are "annoying" and "hated"...it's because it's extremely frustrating to live in a world that places so much emphasis on fairy tales that we know to be false.

I try to avoid the conversations for the most part...but try to empathize with us for once.

 

[thegreatest]

Athiesm is not a belief fukk nikka..

Yes it is, hoe

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

If we atheist are "annoying" and "hated"...it's because it's extremely frustrating to live in a world that places so much emphasis on fairy tales that we know to be false.

I try to avoid the conversations for the most part...but try to empathize with us for once.

but if I can think of the word god, therefore he must exist

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

the nerve you have to call me "out" on strawmaning is some other-level, neo in the matrix, stupid motherfukker shyt. OK, let me break it down for you one time, and the don't even mention my name, you small minded fakkit. You asked for it.

Why are you asking me to prove what I said can't be proven? fukk outta here .

So stop speaking absolutes

I don't have to fit God into your narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be, just like I don't have to fit him into religion's narrow understanding of what he SHOULD be.

If you're not going to define what you're even talking about, then you're wasting our time.

You are just as ignorant as the religious people you claim to hate in your attempts to quantify and the unquantifiable.

this is just wrong... oh my god, you really are this dumb

Where is there a word about a lack of evidence? You BELIEVE it, so you feel it is KNOWLEDGE, i.e. you are ASSUMING that he doesn't exist... You just pulled the rest of that out of your ass.. What you described after saying the word ATHEISM is really AGNOSTICISM, which is exactly what I am, you dumb c*nt... I refer to the entirety of being as god and believe that all religions and folk wisdoms point to one and the same thing, which is just that, but of course you wouldn't know that because you've never explored the issue as deeply as I Have, being a lazy and hateful piece of garbage

Gnosticism = KNOWLEDGE

Agnosticism = Lack of KNOWLEDGE

Theism = BELIEF

Atheism = LACK OF BELIEF

Your second defintion covers this.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I don't know if there is a god, but there is a lack of evidence leading to me to believe.

I am at NO point saying no god exists.

I can't even prove a negative.

I am no more certain your god exists than any other god


This is philosophy (epistemology) ONE-ZERO-ONE​

That's what I just said, retard. Why are you repeating it and acting like you're proving something to me?

you're not getting it.

The very belief you use to cling to is of the same origin as that you claim is invalid because of its origin

Humans created the god concept, yet you claim other religious claims are equally as invalid...

Uhhh... There is no "according to me". I never said God can be jealous or angry. You inferred I meant something I never said (i.e. strawmanning), please stop, you MUST know on some level how embarrassed I am for you and how intellectually limited everything you say is.

I'm not making anything my own, things just are, and god just is,

You predeministic a$$holes are infuriating

You haven't demonstrated "god just is"

as I said from the very beginning, he cannot be explained.

Prove it.

All religions point in the same direction, I don't have to make anything my own or not my own, the main thing is that religions are COORDINATES to the truth, not the truth itself, and that's all I'm saying.

This makes no sense. They're all internally contradictory so on that alone, they at least invalidate each other if one must truly be right.

Hinduism is so contradictory if you take it literally exactly for that reason - it's not meant to be taken as factual truth.

False.

Its clearly meant to be true...we've arrived a point where modern religion is so ridiculous that the most theists can do is say "its not meant to be taken seriously" as if thats some of internal validity

Same with any other religion. They're so confused and clearly fabricated because you're not supposed to take them literally. This is the big human blunder.

Yet if you use this mentality towards the very claims of "god existing" then you claim that is something you're supposed to take seriously.

Ambiguity isn't helping you.

Everything and nothing are one and the same. They are both part of the infinite isness that is God.

Are you going to speak english?

Yes, but you're responsible for misinterpreting everything I say and getting worked up about it. I advise you to cool down and stop your crusade against what you perceive to be lies, when anything you believe in - science, morality, knowledge - is just as limited as the God to the extent you understand him, and claim to hate.

Science makes no assertions, only relies on evidence.

Its a process, not an entity.

Well, look at it this way. We don't understand how Physics works on its deepest level...

we understand more than we did yesterday.

But we have enough knowledge to know of our own ignorance. We know that the human emotion of humor is, but we don't know how or why we evolved it. We know it, and yet we are quite ignorant when it comes to understanding it. You see how that works?

This doesn't mean anything.

Here's another example. I can see you're a misguided, emotional idiot rebelling against something in your personal life that infuriates/infuriated you by lashing out against me and other people who did you no harm, because you're projecting... I know that, and yet I don't understand how you got to be so fukking dumb. See how that is? I can't understand it, and yet I know it. Tadaaaaaa

Can it not be that your ambiguity and inherent ignorance of certain concepts (namely scientific explanations) influences your theology rather than your inability to cope with the flaws of your rationality?

 

[-G$-]

So stop speaking absolutes

If you're not going to define what you're even talking about, then you're wasting our time.

Gnosticism = KNOWLEDGE

Agnosticism = Lack of KNOWLEDGE

Theism = BELIEF

Atheism = LACK OF BELIEF

Your second defintion covers this.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I don't know if there is a god, but there is a lack of evidence leading to me to believe.

I am at NO point saying no god exists.

I can't even prove a negative.

I am no more certain your god exists than any other god


This is philosophy (epistemology) ONE-ZERO-ONE​

you're not getting it.

The very belief you use to cling to is of the same origin as that you claim is invalid because of its origin

Humans created the god concept, yet you claim other religious claims are equally as invalid...

You predeministic a$$holes are infuriating

You haven't demonstrated "god just is"

Prove it.



This makes no sense. They're all internally contradictory so on that alone, they at least invalidate each other if one must truly be right.



False.

Its clearly meant to be true...we've arrived a point where modern religion is so ridiculous that the most theists can do is say "its not meant to be taken seriously" as if thats some of internal validity

Yet if you use this mentality towards the very claims of "god existing" then you claim that is something you're supposed to take seriously.

Ambiguity isn't helping you.

Are you going to speak english?




Science makes no assertions, only relies on evidence.

Its a process, not an entity.


we understand more than we did yesterday.

This doesn't mean anything.

Can it not be that your ambiguity and inherent ignorance of certain concepts (namely scientific explanations) influences your theology rather than your inability to cope with the flaws of your rationality?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

yeah, nikkas are in here catching strays.

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

Yes it is, hoe

How is athiesm a belief dumbass?

We dont believe in shyt...

And we dont disbelieve anything..

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

So stop speaking absolutes

If you're not going to define what you're even talking about, then you're wasting our time.

Gnosticism = KNOWLEDGE

Agnosticism = Lack of KNOWLEDGE

Theism = BELIEF

Atheism = LACK OF BELIEF

Your second defintion covers this.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I don't know if there is a god, but there is a lack of evidence leading to me to believe.

I am at NO point saying no god exists.

I can't even prove a negative.

I am no more certain your god exists than any other god


This is philosophy (epistemology) ONE-ZERO-ONE​

you're not getting it.

The very belief you use to cling to is of the same origin as that you claim is invalid because of its origin

Humans created the god concept, yet you claim other religious claims are equally as invalid...

You predeministic a$$holes are infuriating

You haven't demonstrated "god just is"

Prove it.

This makes no sense. They're all internally contradictory so on that alone, they at least invalidate each other if one must truly be right.



False.

Its clearly meant to be true...we've arrived a point where modern religion is so ridiculous that the most theists can do is say "its not meant to be taken seriously" as if thats some of internal validity

Yet if you use this mentality towards the very claims of "god existing" then you claim that is something you're supposed to take seriously.

Ambiguity isn't helping you.

Are you going to speak english?




Science makes no assertions, only relies on evidence.

Its a process, not an entity.


we understand more than we did yesterday.

This doesn't mean anything.

Can it not be that your ambiguity and inherent ignorance of certain concepts (namely scientific explanations) influences your theology rather than your inability to cope with the flaws of your rationality?

+rep

 

[Nefrodamus]

So stop speaking absolutes

If you're not going to define what you're even talking about, then you're wasting our time.

Gnosticism = KNOWLEDGE

Agnosticism = Lack of KNOWLEDGE

Theism = BELIEF

Atheism = LACK OF BELIEF

Your second defintion covers this.

I'm an agnostic-atheist.

I don't know if there is a god, but there is a lack of evidence leading to me to believe.

I am at NO point saying no god exists.

I can't even prove a negative.

I am no more certain your god exists than any other god


This is philosophy (epistemology) ONE-ZERO-ONE​

you're not getting it.

The very belief you use to cling to is of the same origin as that you claim is invalid because of its origin

Humans created the god concept, yet you claim other religious claims are equally as invalid...

You predeministic a$$holes are infuriating

You haven't demonstrated "god just is"

Prove it.

This makes no sense. They're all internally contradictory so on that alone, they at least invalidate each other if one must truly be right.



False.

Its clearly meant to be true...we've arrived a point where modern religion is so ridiculous that the most theists can do is say "its not meant to be taken seriously" as if thats some of internal validity

Yet if you use this mentality towards the very claims of "god existing" then you claim that is something you're supposed to take seriously.

Ambiguity isn't helping you.

Are you going to speak english?




Science makes no assertions, only relies on evidence.

Its a process, not an entity.


we understand more than we did yesterday.

This doesn't mean anything.

Can it not be that your ambiguity and inherent ignorance of certain concepts (namely scientific explanations) influences your theology rather than your inability to cope with the flaws of your rationality?

You should put this kind of effort in getting yourself a job, buddy