Chronic 2001

the_daddy

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
121
Reputation
0
Daps
38
Reppin
NULL
Been saying this..sound quality feels like it could have been released yesterday..classic record.
 

Theabbot

#DemBootymeats
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,757
Reputation
1,530
Daps
8,346
Reppin
Duuuuuvaaaaal!!
classic album, but that was a long time ago, short answer.. yes there have been quite a few better albums since then, Outkast rings a bell

Remember, I'm not saying that it was the best album ever. I'm saying that it might be the best mixed/mastered/recorded production of all time. I'm focusing on the musicality. No one has mentioned a better produced album here yet.
From the sounds of it, a lot of you dudes haven't heard this album in the right setting yet. You need decent headphones or a good car system. Computer speakers/iphone earbuds will not work here.
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,556
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,506
Reppin
NULL
Which albums though homey? And I'm talking about production/mixing wise. None of those artists you mentioned are production centric save for Ye and Dilla. And IMO, Dilla's production is not in the same bracket as Dre. He is in his own lane. Chopped sample based.
but that's what i'm saying though. it's impossible to compare 2001 to other albums because they had different goals, visions and sounds when it comes to mixing.you'd have to pick an album of the same genre, with more or less the same style and a similar vision.

i've never really paid too much attention to Quik's music but if he came out with albums since, he probably has a couple that could at least rival 2001 as far as mixing is concerned.
 

Theabbot

#DemBootymeats
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,757
Reputation
1,530
Daps
8,346
Reppin
Duuuuuvaaaaal!!
Yeah Quick's mixes were always done well.
A friend of mine mentioned Diana Krall having one of those "Best Mixed Albums of all time". I will have to give it a listen. It seems like engineering/mixing is not as important as it once was. The "good" albums are few and far between.
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,556
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,506
Reppin
NULL
Yeah Quick's mixes were always done well.
A friend of mine mentioned Diana Krall having one of those "Best Mixed Albums of all time". I will have to give it a listen. It seems like engineering/mixing is not as important as it once was. The "good" albums are few and far between.
i don't think it's "not as important". i think people are just going more "left" with their mixes. you're hearing more of those "lo-fi" type mixes. they want it to sound more rugged to add some character to it.
 

Theabbot

#DemBootymeats
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,757
Reputation
1,530
Daps
8,346
Reppin
Duuuuuvaaaaal!!
i don't think it's "not as important". i think people are just going more "left" with their mixes. you're hearing more of those "lo-fi" type mixes. they want it to sound more rugged to add some character to it.
That and it's A LOT cheaper to do it that way too.
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,556
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,506
Reppin
NULL
That and it's A LOT cheaper to do it that way too.
eh...

sometimes it fits more. not everything is meant to sound exactly the same. take the Black Keys albums for example. i wouldn't want them to sound like 2001 mixing wise. sometimes it depends on the vibe you're trying to create.

plus not to diss 2001 or anything, but most of the beats were minimalistic by design. so in a way, it's easier to make the sounds clear and crisp when there's not too many sounds clashing. and it's not meant as a diss. just the way the album was meant to be.
 
Top