Yes, the baby is taken care of since she also has her own money. Here is the problem, she is a representative of too many women who are making poor decisions by having children with deadbeat fathers. She is also the inspiration of many of those women to hope for a man like Russell Wilson to come save them, when the chances of that happening are near nil.
Though she was capable of overcoming her poor decision, many women are not and end up barely being able to take care of themselves let alone the child they knowingly birthed with a man who is incapable, unwilling, and/or uncaring enough to take care of the child he produced. Then we end up with the heinous stats of child abuse, poor test scores, and tragic outcomes leading to prison time. That cycle repeats itself, while a new generation of poor decision makers are raised up.
So no, she represents an outcome that is not at all normally possible for the majority of women who have done what she has done to achieve. So I would rather her actually just point out that the circumstances between her, Future, and their child are troublesome, but they (her and her husband) work through them. A silly immature laugh is definitely not the right response to a question about a circumstance she helped create. It is not the response other impressionable women need to see.