"'Clair Obscur: Expedition 33' utterly destroys Square Enix's gaslighting over Final Fantasy turn-based combat"-Windows Central

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,976
Reputation
3,999
Daps
112,592
Reppin
Tha Land
The premiere franchises in gaming today usually crack that 10 million number on the low end and long term do better than that. That's where I got that number. Being real thought it's doubtful the game has even moved much more than a quarter of the low end. I absolutely believe that Final Fantasy should be in contention with God of War, Resident Evil. It should do way better than say Persona. It's more like what Halo is today than competing with any of those.
Crazy thing is Halo sells way better than FF and reaches way more people, but somehow that’s a flop, in decline, or dead depending on which one of you is talking about it.

Starfield sold 3 mill BEFORE its official release date and that’s a “flop” too.

FF16 at 3 mill is a smashing success tho :wow:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,163
Reputation
8,100
Daps
112,147
The premiere franchises in gaming today usually crack that 10 million number on the low end and long term do better than that. That's where I got that number. Being real thought it's doubtful the game has even moved much more than a quarter of the low end. I absolutely believe that Final Fantasy should be in contention with God of War, Resident Evil. It should do way better than say Persona. It's more like what Halo is today than competing with any of those.
FF sells more than Persona actually, it's just the lack of numbers making it appear that way. Persona 5 including royal as of 2023 sold over 7 million copies which took about 7 years with the latter years it releasing on Switch, PC and Xbox.

FFVII remake on PS4/PS5 in 3 years sold over 7 million.

I wish FF was even bigger than it is, it's a very well known IP but outside of the XIV, FF games are games that sell over time. They're not as big as say Mario or Pokemon.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,586
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,053
Within what context?

FFX which is considered the best selling FF game, sold 20 million after 20 years.

FFXV which came out last gen has sold 10 million, half of that number in 6 years.

FFXVI was said to sell over 3 million in one week on one platform.

FFVII Remake has sold 7 million lifetime since 2020 so that's in 3 years.

We don't know Rebirth's sales numbers, it's just people going "Oh but they didn't say anything so it means it flopped." and then incorrectly pointing to a sales report where they misinterpret their HD games subsection not meeting expectations and attribute that to Rebirth/XVI specifically when the "HD games" also include Foamstars, Visions of Mana, Dragon Quest spinoffs etc.

If you compare the years to which some of the past FF games have been said to sell X amount of copies, you'll notice they're not that different. What people are doing are comparing debut numbers from Japan and incomplete data(e.g. no digital data) and making a conclusion that the games are selling terribly now. FF games have long legs, they don't just stop selling after 1 month. Only way to know if these games "flopped" is if by 2027, Rebirth sells less than 7 million which Remake did on PS4.

"Success" is relative to cost and profits point blank. Nobody knows how much the games cost to make and how much it's profited from that.

The best selling FF game is XIV at nearly 35 Million sold units with something like 1.1 million active subs. It's literally keeping the lights on at Squeenix
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,586
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,053
Crazy thing is Halo sells way better than FF and reaches way more people, but somehow that’s a flop, in decline, or dead depending on which one of you is talking about it.

Starfield sold 3 mill BEFORE its official release date and that’s a “flop” too.

FF16 at 3 mill is a smashing success tho :wow:

Different markets and different expectations. This is like expecting hockey attendance in Arizona to be the same as Soccer attendance in Spain.

Both are sports, but the games and markets for those games couldn't be father apart.

JRPGs have been and always will be niche compared to action games, shooters and sports games. So making a game in the style of a JRPG is coming with the expectation of sales around 5-10 million. You get that for a turn-based RPG and you crushed it.

Hell, Persona 5, one of the best RPGs of the past decade, sold like 7 million copies. And that was a genre, gen-defining game.

The rubric IS different. Same for fighting games, racing games and 4X games too.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,976
Reputation
3,999
Daps
112,592
Reppin
Tha Land
Different markets and different expectations. This is like expecting hockey attendance in Arizona to be the same as Soccer attendance in Spain.

Both are sports, but the games and markets for those games couldn't be father apart.

JRPGs have been and always will be niche compared to action games, shooters and sports games. So making a game in the style of a JRPG is coming with the expectation of sales around 5-10 million. You get that for a turn-based RPG and you crushed it.

Hell, Persona 5, one of the best RPGs of the past decade, sold like 7 million copies. And that was a genre, gen-defining game.

The rubric IS different. Same for fighting games, racing games and 4X games too.
Yall gotta get your story straight.

Supposedly FF games are expected to be huge sellers which is why they have to move away from RPG mechanics.

But now you say FF was never supposed to compete with the large AAA sellers.

All the article says is that clair obscure proves a turned based rpg style final fantasy could be successful.

Don’t even know why we need 10 pages of arguing. That shouldn’t even be a controversial take.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,586
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,053
Yall gotta get your story straight.

Supposedly FF games are expected to be huge sellers which is why they have to move away from RPG mechanics.

But now you say FF was never supposed to compete with the large AAA sellers.

All the article says is that clair obscure proves a turned based rpg style final fantasy could be successful.

Don’t even know why we need 10 pages of arguing. That shouldn’t even be a controversial take.

My first post was about the actual sales of JRPGs and that FF moved away from turn based the only reason they did it was because they didn't have the tech to do other wise.

10m+ in sales is AAA levels. Regardless of genre. However, it's simply the truth to say that XVI and Rebirth didn't meet sales goals. Hell the president of Square Enix said so himself. Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth, Final Fantasy 16, and Foamstars All Failed to Meet Square Enix’s Expectations - IGN

And the article, isn't a hot take at all. It would be. I'm just chiming in to all the people saying that turn-based FF is some untouchable holy grail. It's not, and never was. Not even to SquareEnix.
 
Top