CNN: "Isn’t it interesting that some of those calling most loudly for the BOYCOTT of The Woman King ARE BLACK MEN?"

Mr Mulsanne

CEO of Ugly Gang
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Messages
7,497
Reputation
1,625
Daps
37,160
Reppin
Ugly Gang HQ
A lot of these puppets that are put in these high positions are democrats/liberals/feminists before they are black, hence why this gender war narrative is being pushed


Gender wars are minor when compared to the laws that are being pushed or proposed, and it effects brehs. But continue to be bamboozled my guy.
 

ab.aspectus

Veteran
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
17,375
Reputation
5,928
Daps
71,008
Reppin
Lincoln Park West
That White man in Django was based on no one. There is no historical record of Django and some German White man going around killing Slave masters. The Female warriors do have history supporting their existence. That is the difference between the two. One is about a wholly fictional character and his fictional white benefactor, the other is about actual people who existed.

I have no clue why you seem to not understand that point, unless you do and are just trying to be obtuse about the issue.

:what: :what: :what: :what: :what: :what: nikka are you retarded???

You all are both goofies and just exposed yourselves.

A white benefactor galavanting around the south killing slave masters and freeing slaves is just as much fiction as female Dahomean warriors freeing slaves.

Both of you are being hypocrites because you're applying a standard to one and not the other.

You asked yourself the question; was there a *real* man *name Django* who *had* a *real white benefactor* that *traveled* around the *south* *killing slave owners*?
Your answer: No
Your conclusion: This is fiction.

However....

You similarly did not ask the question; was there a *real* female *Dahomean* warrior *General* named *Nannisca* who *trained* up an *army* to *fight* an *enslaver* in a *real life historical war*.
Your answer should've been no.
Your conclusion then should've been fiction.

But no, y'all CRY to high heaven but bu bu female warriors in Dahomey were real.

Yeah....so were white men in the antebellum south.

Y'all have a double standard caping for white creators white washing southern slave history but not for black creators? One is fiction and the other can't be? You get real specific asking questions for one but not the other? Which is why I keep asking @Uachet to post what actual historical war the movie is depicting for this movie to have been regarded as historically accurate and the only thing he can send are links about the historicity of the Dahomean warriors. Well no shyt. Real white men existed in the south, too. Now back to my question, tell me what actual war this movie is depicting for. it. to. be. historically. accurate.
 

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
126,632
Reputation
14,537
Daps
525,706
Reppin
Queens,NY
You all are both goofies and just exposed yourselves.

A white benefactor galavanting around the south killing slave masters and freeing slaves is just as much fiction as female Dahomean warriors freeing slaves.

Both of you are being hypocrites because you're applying a standard to one and not the other.

You asked yourself the question; was there a *real* man *name Django* who *had* a *real white benefactor* that *traveled* around the *south* *killing slave owners*?
Your answer: No
Your conclusion: This is fiction.

However....

You similarly did not ask the question; was there a *real* female *Dahomean* warrior *General* named *Nannisca* who *trained* up an *army* to *fight* an *enslaver* in a *real life historical war*.
Your answer should've been no.
Your conclusion then should've been fiction.

But no, y'all CRY to high heaven but bu bu female warriors in Dahomey were real.

Yeah....so were white men in the antebellum south.

Y'all have a double standard caping for white creators white washing southern slave history but not for black creators? One is fiction and the other can't be? You get real specific asking questions for one but not the other? Which is why I keep asking @Uachet to post what actual historical war the movie is depicting for this movie to have been regarded as historically accurate and the only thing he can send are links about the historicity of the Dahomean warriors. Well no shyt. Real white men existed in the south, too. Now back to my question, tell me what actual war this movie is depicting for. it. to. be. historically. accurate.

Your retarded ass knows the woman king movie was created and written by WHITE screenwriters right???:what: WTF are you talking about!?!?
Do you understand how fictional characters work??:what:
Do you understand how real people, and actual history and whitewashing works???:dahell:

EDIT: let me make an example for you... that's like two black screenwriters taking historical figures from the holocaust that was nazi's and rewriting them to be heroes that saved the jews from being killed. even tho the guy who your trying to lionize was in fact all on board with killing jews IRL...:dahell: do you think jewish folks would support a movie like that???:patrice: use your brain because its a yes or no answer...:stopitslime:
 
Last edited:

VoxSphere74

All Star
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
1,480
Reputation
489
Daps
6,777
Your retarded ass knows the woman king movie was created and written by WHITE screenwriters right???:what: WTF are you talking about!?!?
Do you understand how fictional characters work??:what:
Do you understand how real people, and actual history and whitewashing works???:dahell:

EDIT: let me make an example for you... that's like two black screenwriters taking historical figures from the holocaust that was nazi's and rewriting them to be heroes that saved the jews from being killed.

You mean a film like Schindler's List? Which is a movie based on Oscar Schindler who's a hero to Jewish people, and is considered one of the best movies of all time? :mjgrin:

You guys need to study actual history before posting this stuff. Because there are heroes in every era in some of the worst environments.


Also yes two white women wrote the script which assured that the film was actually made. Since white Hollywood doesn't support or want to finance projects by Black screenwriters. You know that correct?


And studios refused to do the film before Black Panther. Giving them the run around and only offering $5 million for the project. Which would probably cover one episode of Game of Thrones :mjlol:




So if you et al hate the film cool but lying and changing the reasons for the hate is silly.

*First it was, all Dahomey people were pro-slavery. Obviously they weren't. No group is a hive mind.

*Then it was how dare they sell our ancestors into slavery. Didn't they along with the Mali Empire, Oyo, Ashanti and others do the same?

No response so the argument moved to the next fake reason.

*Which was that it was two white women who wrote the film. Which was ironically the criticism leveled at Black Panther. Who was a character written by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

Which led to not answering the question of well why didn't Black Americans come up with the concept instead of two white guys? And the answer is most Black Americans decades ago mocked and laughed at Africa and wanted nothing to do with it.

So it was embarrassingly left to two white men to do it.

And then we come to the real reason: Black men weren't prominently featured so you didn't feel represented.

Which is understandable so the boycotters can pool their money and do a film about male warriors in Africa but be careful because you'll have to make at least some of them anti-slavery which creates the same problems as this film that supposedly you care about with respect to African empires being involved with the slave trade. :mjgrin:
 
Last edited:

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
126,632
Reputation
14,537
Daps
525,706
Reppin
Queens,NY
You mean a film like Schindler's List? Which is a movie based on Oscar Schindler who's a hero to Jewish people, and is considered one of the best movies of all time? :mjgrin:

You guys need to study actual history before posting this stuff. Because there are heroes in every era in some of the worst environments.


Also yes two white women wrote the script which assured that the film was actually made. Since white Hollywood doesn't support or want to finance projects by Black screenwriters. You know that correct?


And studios refused to do the film before Black Panther. Giving them the run around and only offering $5 million for the project. Which would probably cover one episode of Game of Thrones :mjlol:




So if you et al hate the film cool but lying and changing the reasons for the hate is silly.

*First it was, all Dahomey people were pro-slavery. Obviously they weren't. No group is a hive mind.

*Then it was how dare they sell our ancestors into slavery. Didn't they along with the Mali Empire, Oyo, Ashanti and others do the same?

No response so the argument moved to the next fake reason.

*Which was that it was two white women who wrote the film. Which was ironically the criticism leveled at Black Panther. Who was a character written by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

Which led to not answering the question of well why didn't Black Americans come up with the concept instead of two white guys? And the answer is most Black Americans decades ago mocked and laughed at Africa and wanted nothing to do with it.

So it was embarrassingly left to two white men to do it.

And then we come to the real reason: Black men weren't prominently featured so you didn't feel represented.

Which is understandable so the boycotters can pool their money and do a film about male warriors in Africa but be careful because you'll have to make at least some of them anti-slavery which creates the same problems as this film that supposedly you care about with respect to African empires being involved with the slave trade. :mjgrin:

You know what's another solid difference between Schindler's list and the woman king movie. Jewish financed and directed, Jewish involved and had all the rights and permissions from actual Jews that was probably involved... :sas2: THEY greenlit that movie whereas the woman king was not even written by black writers or created with any black involvement besides the dumbass director... :stopitslime: but hey go ahead and cook nikka...
 

kingofnyc

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
24,520
Reputation
995
Daps
47,704
Reppin
Boogie Down BX
You mean a film like Schindler's List? Which is a movie based on Oscar Schindler who's a hero to Jewish people, and is considered one of the best movies of all time? :mjgrin:

You guys need to study actual history before posting this stuff. Because there are heroes in every era in some of the worst environments.


Also yes two white women wrote the script which assured that the film was actually made. Since white Hollywood doesn't support or want to finance projects by Black screenwriters. You know that correct?


And studios refused to do the film before Black Panther. Giving them the run around and only offering $5 million for the project. Which would probably cover one episode of Game of Thrones :mjlol:




So if you et al hate the film cool but lying and changing the reasons for the hate is silly.

*First it was, all Dahomey people were pro-slavery. Obviously they weren't. No group is a hive mind.

*Then it was how dare they sell our ancestors into slavery. Didn't they along with the Mali Empire, Oyo, Ashanti and others do the same?

No response so the argument moved to the next fake reason.

*Which was that it was two white women who wrote the film. Which was ironically the criticism leveled at Black Panther. Who was a character written by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

Which led to not answering the question of well why didn't Black Americans come up with the concept instead of two white guys? And the answer is most Black Americans decades ago mocked and laughed at Africa and wanted nothing to do with it.

So it was embarrassingly left to two white men to do it.

And then we come to the real reason: Black men weren't prominently featured so you didn't feel represented.

Which is understandable so the boycotters can pool their money and do a film about male warriors in Africa but be careful because you'll have to make at least some of them anti-slavery which creates the same problems as this film that supposedly you care about with respect to African empires being involved with the slave trade. :mjgrin:


:francis: u must be African
 

Arizax2

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
1,388
Reputation
158
Daps
3,789
Movie was good but who was boycotting it and why? Why did that make CNN?
 
Top