Coli Views on Late Term Abortion
- Thread starter froggle
- Start date
Since you quoted me, I'll answer.
Abortion, especially late-term, is an abomination that should only be used in the most extreme of circumstances - health-related issues is one of those circumstances, along with rape and incest.
Given that such circumstances rarely ever happen, it shouldn't be much of a problem.
Any other questions?
given that late term abortions rarely ever happen unless there is an issue of the mother or the fetuses health, my question to you is what are you even talking about?
you: its an abomination except for in these cases, plus these other 2 cases
me: um those are the cases it happens in
????
im actually suprised that you also include rape or incest.
pretty big exception for something one considers an abomination
What's so hard to understand? You brought a hypothetical situation that rarely ever happens, and I made it clear that in such extreme cases, especially those related to health, I can understand why the practice of abortion would be used, for those are situations outside of one's control.
Pregnancies resulting from rape or incest are examples of other extreme cases that rarely ever happen. If you fully comprehended what I posted, my stance shouldn't surprise you.
I DON'T agree if it's not in the first or last trimester it's a no for me. BOTH parties should make that choice not only the woman alone. I'm moderate on abortion.
Like I said, it should NOT just be only a woman's right to choose in that aspect. Because you need the male to procreate. This comes from a person who advocates from women's rights. However, you should be responsible if you have intercourse and get pregnant. However, abortions in risk of the mother and the first trimester.
So, a man who helped put his sperm inside the uterus has no say. If a woman wants to terminate her child while it's in her womb that is totally up to her. If a woman wants to terminate a child that may be birthed with severe complications mentally or physically, that is up to her. I'm pro abortion as there are social benefits that are net positive in the long run for society as a whole. That choice should never be infringed upon.
NYC: More Black Babies Killed by Abortion Than Born
I said it before Margaret Sanger is the real KONY...
Trust a fat cac to state facts
So, a man who helped put his sperm inside the uterus has no say
No he doesn't.
That's like saying a minority owner with 1% of the company gets to make a 50-50 decision.
The minority owner's vote doesn't count
I'm pro-choice, but not with that late term shyt. If a broad kills my baby after 5 or 6 months, she's following right along with him/her 
Nameischosen
Banned
At the end if the day what you going to do? Beat the baby out of her? . good luck getting legislation passed where a man has rights over a fetus in the womb. My personal opinion even if it's fukked up, a man should have enough influence to convince her to keep or abort the baby.So, a man who helped put his sperm inside the uterus has no say
I feel BOTH parties should come up with a resolution. It shouldn't be only one person's right. A male helped put sperm into the uterus. A woman CANNOT pro-create on her on. This is science my friend. I'm socially moderate on social issues and economically liberal on most. I'd be a European centre left type of liberal. I support women's rights, but in this instance this involves BOTH parties/participants.
Nameischosen
Banned
Nothing wrong with that and I feel you as there are many times the situation is reversed and the man wants the child. Personally, if they are legally married then the child should be treated as community property and a man should have some legal recourse but that is never going to happen unfortunately.
