There's really a central question that everybody must ask themselves, and really a national poll should be done on this... WHEN not if we go to 8 teams do you want the best 8 teams regardless of conference or do you want the power 5 champs plus then next best 3 so that you include some fairness to each power 5 conference to have a representative/chance at the championship?
So what would the ranking potentially look like?
Power 5 Champs method:
Bama(SEC)
Penn State(B10)
Clemson(ACC)
Washington(PAC 12)
Oklahoma(B12)
Ohio State(wildcard0
Michigan(wildcard)
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado(wildcard)
Best 8 method:
Bama
Ohio State
Clemson
Washington
Michigan
Penn State
Oklahoma
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado
So basically all the same teams would get in the only difference would be ranking and who gets added in that last spot. Assuming it's clear cut for who gets that last spot(and really when is it ever clear cut) then the only difference between the two methods is ranking and who plays who.
So what would the ranking potentially look like?
Power 5 Champs method:
Bama(SEC)
Penn State(B10)
Clemson(ACC)
Washington(PAC 12)
Oklahoma(B12)
Ohio State(wildcard0
Michigan(wildcard)
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado(wildcard)
Best 8 method:
Bama
Ohio State
Clemson
Washington
Michigan
Penn State
Oklahoma
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado
So basically all the same teams would get in the only difference would be ranking and who gets added in that last spot. Assuming it's clear cut for who gets that last spot(and really when is it ever clear cut) then the only difference between the two methods is ranking and who plays who.



....
