College football 8 team playoffs

Egomaniacal1

Director of the Federal Bureau of Instigation
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,417
Reputation
1,065
Daps
19,378
Reppin
Martin, TN
There's really a central question that everybody must ask themselves, and really a national poll should be done on this... WHEN not if we go to 8 teams do you want the best 8 teams regardless of conference or do you want the power 5 champs plus then next best 3 so that you include some fairness to each power 5 conference to have a representative/chance at the championship?

So what would the ranking potentially look like?

Power 5 Champs method:
Bama(SEC)
Penn State(B10)
Clemson(ACC)
Washington(PAC 12)
Oklahoma(B12)
Ohio State(wildcard0
Michigan(wildcard)
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado(wildcard)

Best 8 method:
Bama
Ohio State
Clemson
Washington
Michigan
Penn State
Oklahoma
USC, Wisconsin or Colorado

So basically all the same teams would get in the only difference would be ranking and who gets added in that last spot. Assuming it's clear cut for who gets that last spot(and really when is it ever clear cut) then the only difference between the two methods is ranking and who plays who.
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,425
Reputation
520
Daps
8,175
Reppin
NULL
the only team that could've taken a game off was Bama. The rest of the conferences came down to the wire even in division races.

The most perplexing thing about college football, IMO, is that its supposed to be somewhat developmental, yet it doesn't reward development or improvement, rather perfection or near perfection with a 2 or 4 team format. An 8 team format could easily put in home games or even a couple of byes as reward for being top ranked. The other 4-6 spots could be motivation to actually have to win your conference. Instead, we seem to get off on eliminating teams in week 1 or 2 even if they are the best team in their conference at the end of the regular season. College football is pretty much the only sport that does that.
 

Axum Ezana

Driving in the fast lane
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
14,437
Reputation
2,676
Daps
29,943
don't know why they cant just set that shyt up like nfl in a way....:yeshrug:
 

SoulController

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,147
Reputation
5,740
Daps
65,447
Reppin
Almighty Garden State
no. 4 is enough, Michigan and USC would be in and have no business in it. having 3 loss teams is an insult to the undefeated's and 1 loss teams

then you'd have the #9 team wondering why they aint in, then it goes to 12. too many games, 15 is already too many
 

RammerJammer

#RollTide #TSC #RiseUp #BullsNation #RIPKobe
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
89,008
Reputation
13,028
Daps
349,879
Reppin
Montgomery, Alabama
Won't happen. The top teams won't allow it, they benefit from weak ass schedules and walk they're way into a 2 game play off series. Bama don't wanna see USC right today

Yea ok

But USC is playing some of the best ball in the country but in this current system, 3 losses ain't cuttin it
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
20,576
Reputation
749
Daps
83,013
Yea ok

But USC is playing some of the best ball in the country but in this current system, 3 losses ain't cuttin it
Like I said earlier, it's not that Bama would lose, but it would be a more grueling road to a chip. Which in my opinion would be more entertaining and impressive
 

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,615
Reputation
1,649
Daps
32,599
Reppin
Houston TX
Like I said earlier, it's not that Bama would lose, but it would be a more grueling road to a chip. Which in my opinion would be more entertaining and impressive

How does a game that Bama won't lose, make their championship run more impressive?

If we're going to write off Bama-USC as a damn near Bama lock, to me... no real reason to shove a 3 loss 8 seed in there to begin with.
 
Top