Precisely.
@DEAD7 understands the need to decriminalize/legalize many drugs on this SAME principle...yet when it comes to reducing the burden on society of teen pregnancies, he doesn't comprehend the impact
Colorado offered free birth control — and teen births fell by 40 percent
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
NZA
LOL
if your daughter doesnt need you to be in the room when she gets some dyck, then you better hope she can get birth control just as easy
How is this government induced????Agreed, i just favor a slower reduction over a govt. induced one.
WTF are you talking about?
This is LITERALLY not government induced.
The government induced one would be RESTRICTING access of the drug
You have a neg pending, fam
Agreed, i just favor a slower reduction over a govt. induced one.
edit: being marginalized by the state isnt the same as by ones children.
...so teens are being forced by the state of Colorado to use these birth control measures then?
In other words, you would rather see the govt lose, than have America winAgreed, i just favor a slower reduction over a govt. induced one.
Dont ever posture as if your political desires are for the general good.
Bookmark this thread if he ever says some pro-libertarian shyt again.In other words, you would rather see the govt lose, than have America win
Dont ever posture as if your political desires are for the general good.
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Education and jobs u dumb FukkWhy do you think cycles of poverty continue?
what do you think puts and early halt to the pursuit of education in many cases?
America is winning either way...In other words, you would rather see the govt lose, than have America win
Dont ever posture as if your political desires are for the general good.
I just think keeping parents in the loop is the better* approach of the two. Is it slower? yes, but faster doesnt mean better.
...so teens are being forced by the state of Colorado to use these birth control measures then?
No, and I'm not even gonna bother explaining, cause the issue(for me at least) is removing parents from the equation.
im not sure, to me I just see a lot of napoleon postswho are you guys arguing with?
Govt.what do you think puts and early halt to the pursuit of education in many cases?
dude. if you're a good parent, youre going to be in the loop. what the fukk are you even talking about. and no, america is not "winning".
You know what, you're right. That's not what you meant. So maybe you can instead explain why a slower decline in the teen birth rate preferable to a faster "government induced" one. Why is "parents being removed from the equation" such a bad thing in this case?