Colts superstar RB Jonathan Taylor requests trade

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,528
Reputation
1,599
Daps
32,344
Reppin
Houston TX
I don't mind the tweets, Irsay isn't the GM.

This is Ballard fukking up again. He'll point out drafting Taylor as one of his big brain plays but it's clear he had no plan on how to eventually handle the 2nd contract.


No reason things should get to this point. It was obvious two seasons ago this contract issue would happen.

 
Last edited:

pete clemenza

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,429
Reputation
3,672
Daps
91,277
Reppin
Cali
That's an insane quote
Minus the "Its a privilege to be a part of it" part its all facts. Outside of a superstar QB, the league is simply just the replacing of bodies like they're lined up like milk cartons in a supermarket's refrigerator. You take one and ten more are waiting right behind it
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
15,106
Reputation
1,633
Daps
56,305
Problem is.. there's too many RB's unemployed right now.. and they're only being offered pennies compared to what they deserve. :francis:
If the position was important as the early 2000s I'd agree. It's a passing league now and most teams can get by without a stud RB look at the last several SB champs. How many star RBs led the way?
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
15,106
Reputation
1,633
Daps
56,305
Except that isn't the argument at all. Some of you act like everything is apples to apples.

A young HB on a rookie contract is valuable.

Teams not wanting to give an HB, a position that takes a lot of wear and tear, a long contract extension after four or five years in the league does not mean they think the position isn't valuable.

How did the contracts for Gurley, Zeke, and Bell turn out? Oh, horrible? Exactly.
Exactly. Gurley retired and bell and Zeke fell off after their paydays. It's not that the teams don't value RBs. They don't value RBs who are expensive and halfway through their careers. Henry is the exception because he's a central part of TNs offense and a beast.
 

TheMailMan

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,651
Reputation
899
Daps
8,236
Exactly. Gurley retired and bell and Zeke fell off after their paydays. It's not that the teams don't value RBs. They don't value RBs who are expensive and halfway through their careers. Henry is the exception because he's a central part of TNs offense and a beast.
Gurley was always hurt and Zeke turned into Zion lol .. I don't follow the colts but RBs running and catching passes out the backfield should be paid . Barkley should of held out but hard to turn down 10mill for 1 year
 

triplehate

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,845
Reputation
1,391
Daps
24,637
Reppin
ECU
I don't mind the tweets, Irsay isn't the GM.

This is Ballard fukking up again. He'll point out drafting Taylor as one of his big brain plays but it's clear he had no plan on how to eventually handle the 2nd contract.


No reason things should get to this point. It was obvious two seasons ago this contract issue would happen.




2nd contract :russ: :pachaha:
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,170
Reputation
2,262
Daps
42,570
Except that isn't the argument at all. Some of you act like everything is apples to apples.

A young HB on a rookie contract is valuable.

Teams not wanting to give an HB, a position that takes a lot of wear and tear, a long contract extension after four or five years in the league does not mean they think the position isn't valuable.

How did the contracts for Gurley, Zeke, and Bell turn out? Oh, horrible? Exactly.

This can be done with a ton of other positions too. How did Derek Carr and Jimmy G contracts work out? How is Kyler's contract working out? How about Amari Cooper? Dez Bryant? Michael Thomas? Ain't nobody in a huff that Brandin Cooks has made over $100m in his career as a short one dimensional WR. Christian Kirk just signed for 4/72, but we're gonna pretend like giving that to a RB is a problem as a second contract? Keenan Allen has been off the field more than on it and he's getting $20 per year.

Y'all will argue RBs down to the bone, but will skip over the context that every other position has bad second contracts too. There's good versions too. Henry got his money and still going. McCaffrey too. Nick Chubb is outperforming the fukk outta his contract. Before that it was Adrian Peterson. Frank Gore. Marshawn. Steven Jackson. Edge. LT.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,132
Reputation
21,627
Daps
306,526
Exactly. Gurley retired and bell and Zeke fell off after their paydays. It's not that the teams don't value RBs. They don't value RBs who are expensive and halfway through their careers. Henry is the exception because he's a central part of TNs offense and a beast.

How is JT not a central part of Indy's offense and a beast too? Even moreso with a historically inexperienced rookie QB coming in who needs all the help he can get with effective play action and RPO. JT makes all that work. And if they felt like he was disposable or not worth paying, how come they passed on multiple really good RBs in the draft to settle for a late 5th round one.
 

gtj1982

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,482
Reputation
1,238
Daps
16,583
Reppin
America's Darkside--210
Except that isn't the argument at all. Some of you act like everything is apples to apples.

A young HB on a rookie contract is valuable.

Teams not wanting to give an HB, a position that takes a lot of wear and tear, a long contract extension after four or five years in the league does not mean they think the position isn't valuable.

How did the contracts for Gurley, Zeke, and Bell turn out? Oh, horrible? Exactly.

Now name all the bad QB contacts? Teams should pay players and not positions. Not every QB deserve a massive contract and not every RB is replaceable fodder.
 

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,528
Reputation
1,599
Daps
32,344
Reppin
Houston TX
How is JT not a central part of Indy's offense and a beast too? Even moreso with a historically inexperienced rookie QB coming in who needs all the help he can get with effective play action and RPO. JT makes all that work. And if they felt like he was disposable or not worth paying, how come they passed on multiple really good RBs in the draft to settle for a late 5th round one.
Exactly, why trade up to draft him in the first place?

I bet Indy was planning on having him finish the league top 5 in rush attempts.
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,436
Reputation
896
Daps
19,186
And this is not a good sign that Jim going to do what it takes to develop the new qb
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
46,547
Reputation
7,661
Daps
143,874
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
How is JT not a central part of Indy's offense and a beast too? Even moreso with a historically inexperienced rookie QB coming in who needs all the help he can get with effective play action and RPO. JT makes all that work. And if they felt like he was disposable or not worth paying, how come they passed on multiple really good RBs in the draft to settle for a late 5th round one.
Because recent years have shown that you can still find some really good RBs in the latter half of the draft without mortgaging up major draft capital to do so.
 
Top