Looks like they gave in and paid the man 



You think they should pay Daniel Jones?Colts won't hopefully make the same mistake as the Giants when he asks for a new deal in the offseason while also having to pay Danny Jones
They've waited a long time to be good and I feel they know the difference with Jones when JT goes over 100 and when he doesn'tColts won't hopefully make the same mistake as the Giants when he asks for a new deal in the offseason while also having to pay Danny Jones
All indications have been they plan to sign him long term and I think giving up those two first for Sauce was another signal of thatYou think they should pay Daniel Jones?
I think they’d be smart to walk away from that and find value in the market
Let this season play out but it's clear that Daniel Jones is not a top flight superstar QB.You think they should pay Daniel Jones?
I think they’d be smart to walk away from that and find value in the market
Why shouldn't they? He fits the scheme they run and you don't have to run yet another body out at the start of a season trying to learn the playbook. There's value in stability in the most important position and he's only 28. Who's going to do better?You think they should pay Daniel Jones?
I think they’d be smart to walk away from that and find value in the market
All indications have been they plan to sign him long term and I think giving up those two first for Sauce was another signal of that

They shouldn’t bc it’s Daniel Jones. He’s playing OK but that team is stacked and tbh he’s not being asked to do much besides don’t turn it over. It’s the JT show, and they’ve got talent on the outsideWhy shouldn't they? He fits the scheme they run and you don't have to run yet another body out at the start of a season trying to learn the playbook. There's value in stability in the most important position and he's only 28. Who's going to do better?
You obviously aren't paying him like he's Mahomes, Lamar, or Allen. A Baker Mayfield, high guarantee dollar deal is more than solid since he's that and maybe a slight notch above.
He should get a little lower than what Sam Darnold got from SeattleWhy shouldn't they? He fits the scheme they run and you don't have to run yet another body out at the start of a season trying to learn the playbook. There's value in stability in the most important position and he's only 28. Who's going to do better?
You obviously aren't paying him like he's Mahomes, Lamar, or Allen. A Baker Mayfield, high guarantee dollar deal is more than solid since he's that and maybe a slight notch above.
I get it, but also contract year DJ is a scammer
Can't go with that, he's made some plays happen too. Everything goes with JT but it's not a Giants situationThey shouldn’t bc it’s Daniel Jones. He’s playing OK but that team is stacked and tbh he’s not being asked to do much besides don’t turn it over. It’s the JT show, and they’ve got talent on the outside
I’d be seeing what up with Mac Jones in the offseason or another backup that’s experienced. But that’s my opinion, he’ll most likely get his check
Baker and Darnold basically have the same dealHe should get a little lower than what Sam Darnold got from Seattle
It’s funny bc I made a post somewhere else the other day that I don’t think DJ is that different from he was on the Giants. He’s not being asked to do as many things on the offense. They’ve taken away a lot of the responsibilities that I think he struggled with in NY. And again the Colts are just a much better team and situation. Having Pittman, Pierce, Downs, Warren makes his reads much easier that’s elite talent not even mentioning JTCan't go with that, he's made some plays happen too. Everything goes with JT but it's not a Giants situation
Colts Daniel Jones is over Giants Daniel Jones pretty comfortably. Besides, Shanahan's system turns shyt into pudding. I don't trust Mac Jones just like I don't trust Purdy outside SF
Baker and Darnold basically have the same deal