TheEgyptianConniption
All Star
Air yards
. Some of you guys go too far. Wrs having twice as many yards as your QB. Makes sense
. Some of you guys go too far. Wrs having twice as many yards as your QB. Makes sense
. Some of you guys go too far. Wrs having twice as many yards as your QB. Makes senseI dont 'hate' hockey, but Im rather indifferent to it, and I actually could skate somewhat decently as a kid. I love soccer tho, and they are pretty much completely different games.I dont understand people who like soccer but hate hockey. Hockey is soccer but smaller, faster, and with hitting and fighting. As a game its basically a better-in-every-way version of soccer
Dez Bryant isn't an elite WR.
James Harden is the best PG in the NBA
I would take a PRIME Ben Rothlisberger over Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers
If boggles my mind why more teams don't spend more draft picks on picking potentially elite OL guards than tackles.
Andrew Luck is that happens when elite QBs end up on bad teams
Pop is definitely betterPhil Jackson is not the greatest basketball coach of all-time.
I dont understand people who like soccer but hate hockey. Hockey is soccer but smaller, faster, and with hitting and fighting. As a game its basically a better-in-every-way version of soccer


women should be able to play college football and nfl with men.
i dont codone domestic violence/hitting women. but i am a pro feminist, and feel every woman deserves the right to get laid the fukk out by kam chancellor.

That nikka been in HIDING, he ain't been up on current events.Alternative stats is making fun of Trump's advisor calling lies "alternative facts" last night



Breh most the best minds and coaches and managers in sports can not only see this kind of shyt with their eyes but also log that info away in their minds

Every single team in the league uses analytics in some way, shape or form - they have been for decades (especially in North American mainstream sports). Today for basketball: whether it be to look at how teams perform on back-to-backs/x-amount of days rest, what lineups are used for different situations, how efficient players/teams are from each spot of the floor, what percentage of type of plays teams run, what are the most efficient plays to run against certain types of defenses, what play situations a player is most efficient, what scheme percentages teams run on defense v different types of offensive sets, # of contested shots v quarter, when a particular player/team's speed/distance drop in which quarter, what percentages of spots a play is initiated; fastbreak v halfcourt v PP etc etc.don't need a damn spreadsheet compiled by some geek who never sweated a day of training in his life to tell em how it is
It seems to me you're wrongly equating advanced stats to solely being formulated metrics (VORP, PER, RPM etc etc), like most folk do - that's not what I'm talking about.I ain't hating on advanced stats for the sake of it, baseball's advanced stats are LEGIT for obvious reasons but you damn near need a supercomputer with its own special software to properly make any sense of all the randomness that happens in sports Like basketball, soccer and hockey and make it into truly usable advanctes stats
There's a ton of data out there on public sites that's "usable" which paints a clearer picture of impact than a standard box score does. My post you quoted is evidence of this - you can find contested rebounds on NBA.com - a measurement which is more accurate of how much impact a player has on the glass rather than just taking rebounds as a whole.And none of that data would ever see the light of day on nba.com or any public site