Coronavirus Thread: Worldwide Pandemic

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
42,311
Reputation
5,874
Daps
118,459
Reppin
Rotten Apple
This shyt is a TOTAL NIGHTMARE…

@jj23 You asked a great question that I never thought about.. If vaccinated and unvaccinated people can spread the virus why do only the unvaccinated have to be subjected to mad testing? I’m vaccinated by the way…

I’m fukkin sick of this pandemic shyt Jesus Christ Trump is the fukkin Devil and nobody can convince me otherwise…. No other President other then that fukkin a$$hole would’ve let this shyt happen to America
 

BK The Great

Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
63,542
Reputation
8,132
Daps
157,215
Reppin
BK NY
Your personal choice should not be put above other people's health.

More power to them

:yeshrug:


No, when you give politicians that much power then its a bigger problem. This is why people overseas is fighting over this issue. Both sides can go eat a dikk.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,451
Reputation
4,637
Daps
121,031
Reppin
Detroit
Right. Dying is totally different to spreading though. People may die but surely the reason for testing is to reduce and manage spread?
So how are we reducing spread with this policy?

I feel there must be an angle I am missing, but the more I try to reconcile this policy to facts, the more puzzled I am.

Vaccinated are less likely to spread according to most recent studies.

But it's also about the bottom line, unvaccinated are more likely to get sick, take time off work, and end up in the hospital (all costing the company money) than people who have been vaccinated. So obviously the company would want to have policies that encourage their employees to get vaccinated.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,936
Reputation
9,782
Daps
124,433
No, when you give politicians that much power then its a bigger problem. This is why people overseas is fighting over this issue. Both sides can go eat a dikk.


This is Italy right? I'm not even sure what "both sides" means in this instance. I plead ignorance on Italian politics.

As for the states they've always had the power to do what you're most worried about.



{{meta.pageTitle}}

Jacobson vs Massachusetts


Facts of the case
A Massachusetts law allowed cities to require residents to be vaccinated against smallpox. Cambridge adopted such an ordinance, with some exceptions. Jacobson refused to comply with the requirement and was fined five dollars.

Question
Did the mandatory vaccination law violate Jacobson's Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty?

Conclusion
The Court held that the law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power to protect the public health and safety of its citizens. Local boards of health determined when mandatory vaccinations were needed, thus making the requirement neither unreasonable nor arbitrarily imposed
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
26,772
Reputation
6,298
Daps
119,872
Vaccinated are less likely to spread according to most recent studies.

But it's also about the bottom line, unvaccinated are more likely to get sick, take time off work, and end up in the hospital (all costing the company money) than people who have been vaccinated. So obviously the company would want to have policies that encourage their employees to get vaccinated.

Right, but am I the only person who sees the policy of requiring PCR tests from the unvaccinated only counterintuitive?

It does nothing to protect from Covid. In fact it increases risk.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,451
Reputation
4,637
Daps
121,031
Reppin
Detroit
Right, but am I the only person who sees the policy of requiring PCR tests from the unvaccinated only counterintuitive?

It does nothing to protect from Covid. In fact it increases risk.

It doesn't increase risk, unless you mean in comparison to testing everyone. They're basically testing the population most at risk of contracting/spreading COVID so as to get them out of the office asap.

And again it's not only about that, it's also an intentional inconvenience meant to encourage staff to get vaccinated.
 

BK The Great

Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
63,542
Reputation
8,132
Daps
157,215
Reppin
BK NY
This is Italy right? I'm not even sure what "both sides" means in this instance. I plead ignorance on Italian politics.

As for the states they've always had the power to do what you're most worried about.



{{meta.pageTitle}}

Jacobson vs Massachusetts


Facts of the case
A Massachusetts law allowed cities to require residents to be vaccinated against smallpox. Cambridge adopted such an ordinance, with some exceptions. Jacobson refused to comply with the requirement and was fined five dollars.

Question
Did the mandatory vaccination law violate Jacobson's Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty?

Conclusion
The Court held that the law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power to protect the public health and safety of its citizens. Local boards of health determined when mandatory vaccinations were needed, thus making the requirement neither unreasonable nor arbitrarily imposed



It's a problem though. Everyone knows this.
 
Top