The USA would like a word with youif they never invaded russia....
germany was the most advanced country in the world at the time

The USA would like a word with youif they never invaded russia....
germany was the most advanced country in the world at the time


I think most people consider WWII at least the onset of it to be essentially Germany VS The rest of Europe, then Russia. The US involvement didn't come till later. A win, at least how I view it, would have been if Germany had managed to invade and conquer Europe.Whats considered a win?
No one is fukking invading the USA![]()
Manstein has a claim on best general ever. Dude wasVon Manstein > Guderian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rommel

Von Manstein > Guderian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rommel
Manstein has a claim on best general ever. Dude was![]()

Dig deeper.You Germans are insane. Manstein was bytch slapped by the Soviets.
Taking France and Poland is no bragging rights compared to the rest of the war. That's when the big boys came out to play.
Best general ever![]()
Dig deeper.
The French and British armies were arguably significantly stronger than the Germans before the invasion btw. Your narrative is driven almost entirely by American propaganda.
What propaganda are you speaking of? American Generals and Admirals ran the war on both theaters.
I feel like I'm discussing this again with a more intelligent version of Master Teacher.I feel like I'm discussing this again with a more intelligent version of Master Teacher.
Allies winning the war does not mean the allies had the better generals. You seem quite unable to separate the two. Generalship is one small piece of a much larger puzzle.Did they not or is every historical account erroneous?
Allies winning the war does not mean the allies had the better generals. You seem quite unable to separate the two. Generalship is one small piece of a much larger puzzle.
If you were to assume that a zhukov vs von Manstein showdown was completely equal in every other area and zhukov came out on top, then you can make that argument. Unfortunately that's an awful assumption. If you want to talk about it battle by battle, I'd enjoy that but it's seems like you'd be flying around Wikipedia to populate your responses.
You addressed me with some silliness first. If you want to make slick comments, make sure you're on point with your own opinion. I'm not seeing anything worth my time brehNo need to get personal in defense of your Nazi generals. Just having a difference of opinion.
We can talk about as many battles as you wish. Do you know any battles in the Pacific?

Allies winning the war does not mean the allies had the better generals. You seem quite unable to separate the two. Generalship is one small piece of a much larger puzzle.
If you were to assume that a zhukov vs von Manstein showdown was completely equal in every other area and zhukov came out on top, then you can make that argument. Unfortunately that's an awful assumption. If you want to talk about it battle by battle, I'd enjoy that but it's seems like you'd be flying around Wikipedia to populate your responses.