Damn and yet another increase sounds like we will be back at 100k a day or more territory by the end of the summer.
Well clearlyWE OUTSIDE

I think they are referring to the Singapore and UK resultsPeople really need to start qualifying their statements.
"The data everywhere else" is what data exactly? From what sources? What specifically does it contradict in this study?
"No one thinks that data is solid from that study" Who is "no one"? Can you be specific? What are the issues they have with the study? What data is not solid and why?
I don't think it's smart to automatically disregard findings that contradict consensus. Consensus changes with new data and that new data should be analyzed objectively.








Yea this shyt getting nuts. Be safe out there people


Dude at my job tested positive for Covid and he took the Pfizer vaccine![]()
Nope and I’m not sure. I was told that he said he wasn’t feeling well and decided to get tested and came back positiveOut of curiosity, do the test people at your work on a regular basis?
If not, why did he decide to get tested
Nope and I’m not sure. I was told that he said he wasn’t feeling well and decided to get tested and came back positive
What data? Literally every other study and real world examples from mostly vaccinated areas. States where infections in the vaccinated are minimal. Places where severe outcomes and hospitalizations for anyone under 60 and vaccinated are microscopic: Canada and UK where the studies were actually published and peer reviewed and not like this Israel study which wasn’t even contextualized what was actually looked at. The Israel study could be 50 people. It doesn’t say. Could be all 60+ vulnerable folks. It doesn’t say. Which is why scientists from around the world don’t take the findings as concrete. It contradicts the rest of the vaccinated worlds data for a reason. The question is why? They need to come with an actual study to put those questions to bedPeople really need to start qualifying their statements.
"The data everywhere else" is what data exactly? From what sources? What specifically does it contradict in this study?
"No one thinks that data is solid from that study" Who is "no one"? Can you be specific? What are the issues they have with the study? What data is not solid and why?
I don't think it's smart to automatically disregard findings that contradict consensus. Consensus changes with new data and that new data should be analyzed objectively.
In about another week and a half maybe 2 weeks we should know if the death rates are going to start skyrocketing.i'd be super surprised if there was another lockdown in 'merica. regardless of how many people start dropping like flies (if that happens).