COVID 'Lambda' Variant Showing Vaccine Resistence

[HarlemHottie]

So I'll ask again, what would a Pharmacy company have to gain by killing large swaths of the population with a vaccine in a first would country except get itself put out of business.

Same thing they got out of the opioid crisis: money from repeat customers. They don't care if you die. A few hundred million $ in potential fines is a drop in the bucket.

I cant believe yall take this nikka seriously.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Dude, China hasn't even wrangled this disease and it's a Communist country.

China is not America. Simple logistics is preventing them from vaccinating their entire population, not vaccine hesitancy. My proposal was making the vaccine mandatory, like the vaccines received to attend school. FDA Approval will make that a viable strategy along with penalties for remaining unvaccinated which, in turn, will lead to massive civil unrest here.​

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

Same thing they got out of the opioid crisis: money from repeat customers. They don't care if you die. A few hundred million $ in potential fines is a drop in the bucket.

I cant believe yall take this nikka seriously.

You people really don't live in the same reality as the rest of us? You really don't see the difference between drug addition and a life saving vaccine killing citizens in a country? You understand why I called you a crazy person right?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Same thing they got out of the opioid crisis: money from repeat customers. They don't care if you die.

If you die, how can you be a repeat customer? That seems a rather poor business model.​

 

[HarlemHottie]

If you die, how can you be a repeat customer? That seems a rather poor business model.​

The same way opioid addicts are: you come for the initial shot and subsequent boosters. If you die 5- 10 yrs down the road, they already made their r+d investment many times over, plus a few billion.

Yall really don't understand late stage capitalism at all.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

The same way opioid addicts are: you come for the initial shot and subsequent boosters. If you die 5- 10 yrs down the road, they already made their r+d investment many times over, plus a few billion.

Yall really don't understand late stage capitalism at all.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The same way opioid addicts are: you come for the initial shot and subsequent boosters.

This argument doesn't work since no one is returning for a booster shot if most of the population is vaccinated.

See measles.

By remaining unvaccinated, you are enabling them to exploit the population.​

 

[HarlemHottie]

You really don't see the difference between drug addition and a life saving vaccine killing citizens in a country?

That's distinction is irrelevant to their bottom line.


Ol " but why would bankers knowingly sell risky credit default swaps to pensions???" head ass. FOR MONEY!

 

[HarlemHottie]

There wouldn't be a need for booster shots if more people were vaccinated, which is the goal. Also, the manufacturers make MORE money if the vaccine is safe and effective. Who makes money from you remaining unvaccinated aside from hospitals and morgues?​

Why are you LYING? Viruses mutate regardless. If we all got vaxxed, it would mutate to fight the vaccine. Basic science.

To the rest, you're describing a free market, with competition and normal market forces. This is not a free market. All major industries operate the same: if the product's not safe, they simply buy the politician and/ or agency who will deem it so. If the model holds up, they'll seek to enforce compliance through, 1, donating to whichever political party seems more amenable to pushing that line, and, 2, a fierce media campaign undergirded by paid researchers and paid posters.

It's like, y'all live in modernity, see this shyt occur everyday, but can't put the ideas together to foresee likely events.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

That's distinction is irrelevant to their bottom line.

This argument doesn't work, either. Manufacturers make more money from chronic illnesses. Conditions that take YEARS to treat with daily medicinal intake, not something that provides long-lasting protection FROM illness. They'd make way more money not making a vaccine at all and for a far, far longer time.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Why are you LYING?

When's the last time you saw someone suffering from polio?

​

 

[HarlemHottie]

Manufacturers make more money from chronic illnesses

That's already lined up. They'll be treating long covid for decades.

When's the last time you saw someone suffering from polio?

​

​

Poliovirus is usually spread from person to person through infected fecal matter entering the mouth.[1] It may also be spread by food or water containing human feces and less commonly from infected saliva.

A better example might be a virus transmitted through the air.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

That's already lined up. They'll be treating long covid for decades.

So, like I said, they'd make MORE money for a much longer time by NOT making a vaccine since treating chronic illnesses is the majority of their profit.
​

A better example might be a virus transmitted through the air.

Nah, this one's enough......

1916 New York City polio epidemic - Wikipedia

​

 

[Reign_Of_The_Most_High]

No, the mRNA vaccine definitely does NOT change your DNA, either irreversibly or reversibly. You're reading way to much into that sentence, it was just saying that mRNA vaccines are not doing what gene therapy does.




But it's bullshyt to link an article saying, "This is a question that hasn't been answered yet" when those questions have long since been answered.

You're deflecting from the fact that out of 9 studies you linked, 5 of them have already been shown NOT to apply to the Covid vaccines, 2 others had NOTHING to do with actual vaccines at all, and the other two were just regular, well-known information.




Goddamn, after that clusterfukk you're really going to double-down on more copy-pasting from social media? That study's own author has stated that the instagram post you copy-pasted that from is full of bullshyt. He was only pointing out that RRR and ARR should both be publicized for public health experts - unfortunately most laymen looking at it don't understand that ARR is not comparable to RRR at all and that ARR will change dramatically depending on how prevalent infection becomes.

The article cited in the post is a Lancet Microbe commentary, not a peer-reviewed study. And one of its authors, along with other experts, said the post’s interpretation is misleading. "It is extremely disappointing to see how information can be twisted," said Piero Olliaro, a professor of poverty related infectious diseases at the University of Oxford’s Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health. "We do not say vaccines do not work."

But the "bottom line," Olliaro said, is that "these vaccines are good public health interventions."​

PolitiFact - Instagram post misleads on vaccine efficacy by conflating two different measures

One I didnt get any information from any social media post. This is my own curiosity into understanding the argument from both sides and making a informed decision for myself and offering the information to other so they can see the full picture regardless of what media chooses to tell them or not tell them. What find interesting from a lot of posters here that are generally looked as critical thinkers, is we've seen throughout history governments experimenting on the populace, pushing through treatments, vaccines etc regardless of their own internal studies etc. But when it comes to this, none of this skepticism and past precedence is considered seriously, its dismissed as "conspiracy theory" or political leverage by whatever party that is the flavor of the month to hate. I get people dont want to think you have groups/organizations/individuals that are willing to shape the world their visions, regardless of the measures it may take. But in the same vein your moral compass isnt their's.

When you have the WEF head honcho Klaus Schwab along with, Justin Trudeau and others talking about using this situation as a catalyzing event to shape the world into their vision of a "Great Reset" that is language and actions that needs to be monitored, protested and pushed back against. I don't know about others but I don't trust meglomanics.


8 predictions for the world in 2030

 

[BaltimoreTwilightMarauder]

8. It does state it changes your DNA, hence the "NOT irreversibly change cell DNA", meaning the changes are not irreversible. I mean you have the Tal Zaks CEO of Moderna saying their "hacking the software of life". Without the synthetic mRNA of this platform your body cannot make the spike protein.

Just because an article is old doesn't mean the content isnt useful. For example the information regarding sterilizing vaccines vs anti-disease (lessening severity of disease) leading to vaccine escape and increased virulence of variants.

And of course natural immunity works off surviving an infection, but some reports of the death incidence being less than %1 and with the vaccine 0.04 (one of the ways where they tout the lauded 95% efficacy) I rather take my chances. Considering I have a higher chance of side effects or death in regards to vaccine. People act as if getting covid is a guarantee.

The plan should have been to use early treatment and vaccinating those of high risk groups and with FULL informed consent, not mass vaccinations regardless of previous covid infections or healthy individuals.

COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room

This niqqa is retarded