Creh smokes another creh on cam

3rd Ward Swangin

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
6,958
Reputation
-110
Daps
18,646
There is two things he did that was against the law. He brandished the weapon. He also shot the weapon which also against the law.

Had this been another race he'd been charged for that. The only time I've seen this work in a black person's favor was with a black woman. She shot an old man, he'd tried striking her though.

That hesitation before shooting dude would get any of us charged.

I don't know how this man could raise this man's children he just killed. Another thought is if this was black women they'd be blamed for letting these two spiral out of control.

The other case in with the father and son hasn't even gone to trial. It also involved a dumb wife and husband.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,563
Reputation
310
Daps
42,069
Reppin
Las Vegas
You're a fukking gun nut, not a legal expert. We already caught you saying "most police shootings are justified" and trying to juelz for Michael Drejka after he shot that breh.

Did you think I'd be shocked that a White conservative pro-gun activist with connections to Texas judges got off? You don't say! :ohhh:

Not like I hadn't already predicted this:





But that doesn't mean it was right. Your own video you were trying to use said so.
“Gun nut” yet i was just agreeing with Biden on his gun statement :heh: you are just flat out wrong here. As usual. In here juelzing, as usual. Mayweather gif handing out Ls yet who was wrong here? As usual.
 

Rhakim

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
36,275
Reputation
13,915
Daps
146,145
Reppin
Inglewood
“Gun nut” yet i was just agreeing with Biden on his gun statement :heh: you are just flat out wrong here. As usual. In here juelzing, as usual. Mayweather gif handing out Ls yet who was wrong here? As usual.


You only claim I'm wrong by lying about what I said. I told you multiple times he could easily get off because he's a white conservative pro-gun activist in Texas with close connections to judges. I never said he would get charged, I said he should have gotten charged. You don't understand the difference.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,563
Reputation
310
Daps
42,069
Reppin
Las Vegas
You only claim I'm wrong by lying about what I said. I told you multiple times he could easily get off because he's a white conservative pro-gun activist in Texas with close connections to judges. I never said he would get charged, I said he should have gotten charged. You don't understand the difference.
That was never the debate. In here posting YouTube and other message board discussions of people saying he would be charged and acting like that was the result. Low and behold, it wasn’t. I offered to bet you he wouldn’t get convicted. Naturally, crickets after all the false bravado. “I said he should not would” :dead:
 

Rhakim

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
36,275
Reputation
13,915
Daps
146,145
Reppin
Inglewood
That was never the debate. In here posting YouTube and other message board discussions of people saying he would be charged and acting like that was the result. Low and behold, it wasn’t. I offered to bet you he wouldn’t get convicted. Naturally, crickets after all the false bravado. “I said he should not would” :dead:

Liar. I didn't post a single Youtube video, one of YOU posted a youtube video of a bunch of conservative lawyers and I exposed y'all because most of THEM said that he should be charged. Then I posted a pro-gun message board where most of them said it was a bad shoot. NOT that he would be charged, but that he SHOULD be charged. You don't know the difference.

I never once said that he would be charged, I just said that what he did was wrong and against the law. You have to lie on me you already know you lost.



I offered to bet you he wouldn’t get convicted. Naturally, crickets after all the false bravado. “I said he should not would” :dead:

So you're gonna lie on me a second time? When you offered to bet I asked you why you were trying to bet me on something I wasn't even arguing. I said straight up back then that he had too many connections so his case probably wasn't going to follow the law. Why are you lying and claiming I was "crickets" when I said the exact same shyt back then that I'm saying now?
 

Rhakim

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
36,275
Reputation
13,915
Daps
146,145
Reppin
Inglewood
They really don’t get it wrong all that often in relation to the actual number of officer involved shooting there are.
Bushed for what? Saying this shooting is justified while everyone else is on some race shyt?
Everyone discussing this I’m this thread is an armchair. You’re still here because you didn’t point a taser at a cop after overpowering him for it. You know why you didn’t? Because you know it would end the same. That’s why I haven’t in any run ins with police.
Spoiler: use of deadly force is justified when there is an imminent lethal threat to someone
It’s a guy in nyc holding a gun in front of a cop car. FIll me in when that became legal. ALL this straw man bullshyt to try and angle race into anything. corny as fukk
He made his own bed :manny:
Exactly. Careful though you might get banned for having an opinion a policeman is justified
I’m perfectly fine with some carjacker getting his face rearranged by a billy club
What deadbeats are still rallying around defund the police in 2022 after the last couple years :dead:
How can you be obtuse about a movement where most behind it literally meant they wanted to abolish the police force while watching crime skyrocket?
Says “officers almost exclusively patrol the city” but tell me again how it works when there’s more officers and crime drops?
Don’t commit felonies if you are worried about someone having your dna on file. You won’t be linked to any crimes that way



Like I said, you're waaaay too fukking shoot-happy. This wasn't even half the times you've defended shootings on here or rallied for more cops and more cop brutality. You and I have a fundamentally different view of how beneficial it is to the country for White people to keep using authoritarian violence.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,563
Reputation
310
Daps
42,069
Reppin
Las Vegas
Like I said, you're waaaay too fukking shoot-happy. This wasn't even half the times you've defended shootings on here or rallied for more cops and more cop brutality. You and I have a fundamentally different view of how beneficial it is to the country for White people to keep using authoritarian violence.
What shootings did I defend that weren’t justified? Someone defending themselves is what weapons are for. Legit the only reason someone would need arms. That’s not “shoot happy” that’s why there’s an amendment that people abuse in the first place.
 
Top