So he wasn't hired by their family. Like I said.
Also, there's this:
But you're still out here trying to use him as a credible source.
Debbie Wasserman-Shultz Staffer Arrested For Bank Fraud
- Thread starter Black Panther
- Start date
-
- Tags
- conspiracy dnc dws triggered trumpset
Also, there's this:
Hubert Youngblood
Banned
Forensication
This seems important, and completely lost in the shuffle (and I'm assuming will be ignored by all the fine analysts of documents who pop up to blame Putin for something or other). "New Blockbuster Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked" (and see comment by LyLo: "Various ***** autists seem to be of the belief that "Guccifer 2.0" is, in fact, the DNC staging a leak. Which would totally align with this new information, unlike most other running theories (Rich aside). (Not necessarily endorsing, just wanted to throw that out there.)":
"The document states that the files that eventually published as "NGP-VAN" by Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that "the .7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the range of the file times in the .rar files." This constitutes the first of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the information eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a Russian hacker.
The Forensicator stated in their analysis that a USB drive was most likely used to boot Linux OS onto a computer that either contained the alleged DNC files or had direct access to them. They also explained to us that in this situation one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS. A large amount of data would then be copied to this same USB drive.
In this case, additional files would have been copied en masse, to be "pruned" heavily at a later time when the 7zip archive now known as NGP-VAN was built. The Forensicator wrote that if 1.98 GB of data had been copied at a rate of 22.6 MB/s and time gaps t were noticed at the top level of the NGP-VAN 7zip file were attributed to additional file copying, then approximately 19.3 GB in total would have been copied. In this scenario, the 7zip archive (NGP-VAN) would represent only about 10% of the total amount of data that was collected.
The very small proportion of files eventually selected for use in the creation of the "NGP-VAN" files were later published by the creators of the Guccifer 2.0 persona. This point is especially significant, as it suggests the possibility that up to 90% of the information initially copied was never published.
The use of a USB drive would suggest that the person first accessing the data could not have been a Russian hacker. In this case, the person who copied the files must have physically interacted with a computer that had access to what Guccifer 2.0 called the DNC files. A less likely explanation for this data pattern where large time gaps were observed between top level files and directories in the 7zip file, can be explained by the use of 'think time' to select and copy 1.9 GB of individual files, copied in small batches with think time interspersed. In either scenario, Linux would have been booted from a USB drive, which fundamentally necessitates physical access to a computer with the alleged DNC files.
The Forensicator believed that using the possible 'think-time' explanation to explain the time-gaps was a less likely explanation for the data pattern available, with a large amount of data most likely copied instantaneously, later "pruned" in the production of the Guccifer 2.0's publication of the NGP-VAN files.
Both the most likely explanation and the less likely scenario provided by The Forensicator's analysis virtually exclude the possibility of a Russian or remote hacker gaining external access to the files later published as "NGP-VAN." In both cases, the physical presence of a person accessing a containing DNC information would be required.
Importantly, The Forensicator concluded that the chance that the files had been accessed and downloaded remotely over the internet were too small to give this idea any serious consideration. He explained that the calculated transfer speeds for the initial copy were much faster than can be supported by an internet connection. This is extremely significant and completely discredits allegations of Russian hacking made by both Guccifer 2.0 and Crowdstrike.
This conclusion is further supported by analysis of the overall transfer rate of 23 MB/s. The Forensicator described this as "possible when copying over a LAN, but too fast to support the hypothetical scenario that the alleged DNC data was initially copied over the Internet (esp. to Romania)." Guccifer 2.0 had claimed to originate in Romania. So in other words, this rate indicates that the data was downloaded locally, possibly using the local DNC network. The importance of this finding in regards to destroying the Russian hacking narrative cannot be overstated.
If the data is correct, then the files could not have been copied over a remote connection and so therefore cannot have been "hacked by Russia." The use of a USB drive would also strongly suggest that the person copying the files had physical access to a computer most likely connected to the local DNC network. Indications that the individual used a USB drive to access the information over an internal connection, with time stamps placing the creation of the copies in the East Coast Time Zone, suggest that the individual responsible for initially copying what was eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona under the title "NGP-VAN" was located in the Eastern United States, not Russia."
This seems important, and completely lost in the shuffle (and I'm assuming will be ignored by all the fine analysts of documents who pop up to blame Putin for something or other). "New Blockbuster Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked" (and see comment by LyLo: "Various ***** autists seem to be of the belief that "Guccifer 2.0" is, in fact, the DNC staging a leak. Which would totally align with this new information, unlike most other running theories (Rich aside). (Not necessarily endorsing, just wanted to throw that out there.)":
"The document states that the files that eventually published as "NGP-VAN" by Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that "the .7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the range of the file times in the .rar files." This constitutes the first of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the information eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a Russian hacker.
The Forensicator stated in their analysis that a USB drive was most likely used to boot Linux OS onto a computer that either contained the alleged DNC files or had direct access to them. They also explained to us that in this situation one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS. A large amount of data would then be copied to this same USB drive.
In this case, additional files would have been copied en masse, to be "pruned" heavily at a later time when the 7zip archive now known as NGP-VAN was built. The Forensicator wrote that if 1.98 GB of data had been copied at a rate of 22.6 MB/s and time gaps t were noticed at the top level of the NGP-VAN 7zip file were attributed to additional file copying, then approximately 19.3 GB in total would have been copied. In this scenario, the 7zip archive (NGP-VAN) would represent only about 10% of the total amount of data that was collected.
The very small proportion of files eventually selected for use in the creation of the "NGP-VAN" files were later published by the creators of the Guccifer 2.0 persona. This point is especially significant, as it suggests the possibility that up to 90% of the information initially copied was never published.
The use of a USB drive would suggest that the person first accessing the data could not have been a Russian hacker. In this case, the person who copied the files must have physically interacted with a computer that had access to what Guccifer 2.0 called the DNC files. A less likely explanation for this data pattern where large time gaps were observed between top level files and directories in the 7zip file, can be explained by the use of 'think time' to select and copy 1.9 GB of individual files, copied in small batches with think time interspersed. In either scenario, Linux would have been booted from a USB drive, which fundamentally necessitates physical access to a computer with the alleged DNC files.
The Forensicator believed that using the possible 'think-time' explanation to explain the time-gaps was a less likely explanation for the data pattern available, with a large amount of data most likely copied instantaneously, later "pruned" in the production of the Guccifer 2.0's publication of the NGP-VAN files.
Both the most likely explanation and the less likely scenario provided by The Forensicator's analysis virtually exclude the possibility of a Russian or remote hacker gaining external access to the files later published as "NGP-VAN." In both cases, the physical presence of a person accessing a containing DNC information would be required.
Importantly, The Forensicator concluded that the chance that the files had been accessed and downloaded remotely over the internet were too small to give this idea any serious consideration. He explained that the calculated transfer speeds for the initial copy were much faster than can be supported by an internet connection. This is extremely significant and completely discredits allegations of Russian hacking made by both Guccifer 2.0 and Crowdstrike.
This conclusion is further supported by analysis of the overall transfer rate of 23 MB/s. The Forensicator described this as "possible when copying over a LAN, but too fast to support the hypothetical scenario that the alleged DNC data was initially copied over the Internet (esp. to Romania)." Guccifer 2.0 had claimed to originate in Romania. So in other words, this rate indicates that the data was downloaded locally, possibly using the local DNC network. The importance of this finding in regards to destroying the Russian hacking narrative cannot be overstated.
If the data is correct, then the files could not have been copied over a remote connection and so therefore cannot have been "hacked by Russia." The use of a USB drive would also strongly suggest that the person copying the files had physical access to a computer most likely connected to the local DNC network. Indications that the individual used a USB drive to access the information over an internal connection, with time stamps placing the creation of the copies in the East Coast Time Zone, suggest that the individual responsible for initially copying what was eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona under the title "NGP-VAN" was located in the Eastern United States, not Russia."
We've already discussed this. The file structure on the USB would not be the same file structure containing the Data store.
#Nothingburger
#Nothingburger
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
*Alright cracks knuckles*
I think Stefan Molyneaux has covered all of the main points other people have covered, so to make it easier I'll use this video.
Also, everything after the time stamps are facts. Everything in bullet points are mostly opinions.
@0:55 Feb 2, 2017 Democrat-hired IT workers Abid Awan, Imran Awan, Jamal Awan, Mina Alvi, and Natalia Sava were barred from House of Representatives computer networks.
@1:15 Awan family members are currently under investigation by U.S. Capitol Police after it was discovered that congressional information being "funneled" to an off-site server and various equipment had been stolen.
@2:00 Due to nature of IT work, suspects had full access to emails and other sensitive documents of dozens of congressional members that included those on homeland security, foreign affairs, and intelligence committees.
@2:05 Imran Awan was born in Pakistan, and reportedly spent lots of time in country while supposedly working on Capitol Hill.
@2:35 Since 2005, Imran Awan provided IT services for now former DNC chairwoman and current Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and many other representatives.
- S. Molyneaux mentions that no vetting process has been revealed so far for this group of IT aides.
- S. Molyneaux has heard that some congressional IT aides believe congresspeople are being blackmailed, with the amount of "devotion" being showed to these IT aides.
Last edited:
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Fake News:cambybp:
Yeah....sorry T'Challa....but this is a major story....the story itself OVERSHADOWS who ever is explaining the story....
...It's so many angles on this..
..I'm gone have to list each of the main points....So yeah...sit back and enjoy the show.....
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Last edited:
...
Who gave you permission to use my name? :bpthink:
A terrible poster such as yourself has no business speaking my given name. :martinbp:
Refer to me by my title. :bpufedup:
but this is a major story....the story itself OVERSHADOWS who ever is explaining the story....
By this same logic, #TrumpRussia isn't a "fairy tale", as you've previously described it.
You constantly cite the idea that a story isn't credible if the MSM is reporting it, yet you're willing to believe the first idiot with a YouTube channel that presents ideas you agree with.
I'm sorry if I prefer people who actually have journalism degrees doing the reporting rather than alt-right keyboard activists.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
greenygreen
Banned
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Ya Sinning Mane
Superstar
Dog Face Debbie lol.
@greenygreen
@greenygreen
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
So Debbie Wasserman Schultz is blatantly lying now, implicating herself.
She told the press this week that Imran Awan, who was arrested, had no access to DNC only that he could troubleshoot and provide provide access.
Yet, Wikileaks email ID #41311, in a May 4, 2016 explains differently. That email ID and date show an email exhange between DNC Deputy Director Garrett Bonowski(sp) and DNC Assistant to the Chair Amy Crowe(sp) saying that Imran Awan had access to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's password to her Ipad......which would imply since he worked for 30 other Congressional Democrats that he had their passwords too
, and the network itself..
Keep in my mind Imran Awan had dozens of Congressional DNC hardrives sitting broken at property that he owned.
Yet, somehow Russians hacking DNC emails with support from Trump is the narrative....
.
Not a squeak from MsM.
She told the press this week that Imran Awan, who was arrested, had no access to DNC only that he could troubleshoot and provide provide access.
Yet, Wikileaks email ID #41311, in a May 4, 2016 explains differently. That email ID and date show an email exhange between DNC Deputy Director Garrett Bonowski(sp) and DNC Assistant to the Chair Amy Crowe(sp) saying that Imran Awan had access to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's password to her Ipad......which would imply since he worked for 30 other Congressional Democrats that he had their passwords too
, and the network itself.
.Keep in my mind Imran Awan had dozens of Congressional DNC hardrives sitting broken at property that he owned.
Yet, somehow Russians hacking DNC emails with support from Trump is the narrative....
.Not a squeak from MsM.
Last edited:
gangreen
Top Notch
at this bish, No one believes you. She seems like a real manipulator.Either he got dirt on her and/or he was banging her. She just needs to go away.
the cac mamba
Veteran
lock her up 