It was stupid then and its stupid now...the answer in this case matters not. And I know because I literally watched EVERY match of the WC...yes with Picture in Picture and when the pre-games and post games came on I watched those too.
It's beyond stupid you STILL don't even see the reasoning as to why I was upset. You instantly went into defensive mode. We can disagree and I can respect you for that. But you failed to even see the other side of the argument making you no better than the people coming in and just calling you a cac and leaving
actually you drew me back in.
1. I never got defensive, you're the one who was defensive, but this is perception isn't it. Then you started trying to prove you point by bringing up strawmans, which I vigorously rebuffed but again that perception.
2. You've failed to read the plenty of times where I said, I understand the point everyone is making here. But it's ignorant and you can blame the reporter all you want. The reaction from the much more known Demarcus COusins is what everyone cares about, until he gave rise to the reports question by answering it in such a horrible low-brow fashion.
You drew me back in because you want to paint this picture of me being defensive....defensive about what? I called you and other ignorant, you can't say the same about me. Demarcus lacks decorum anyone of a learned background would tell you, you don't give rise to those type of questions. Which is exactly what D.C did and it's a shame. You guys sound like Republicans/Tea Partiers defending Sarah Palin against "gotcha" journalism. You think those journalist's care? They continued to bombard her with those questions because they knew she was too stupid/ignorant to answer them in a way that would diffuse the question. All her republican and tea partier cohorts realized this and started making stupid and ignorant statements about the journalists, because they couldn't do anything else. This is a similar situation and it's funny watching you guys defend D.C. and lambaste the journalist.