I think there's a way to answer the question without seeming so sensitive. Talk about how a lot them are probably experiencing buyers remorse. So many ways she could have finessed this. But it kind of seems like she wanted a soft ball I terview because she's already annointed herself.Seems like a good clip to me. I believe from a statistical perspective she’s right about not needing 40% of that voting block to win….if the math on point, no need to both side and reach across the aisle with that patty cake shyt, appease to your own values & base.
We gotta stop this requiring politeness shyt from one side and even moreso if it’s a female from that one side.
If Porter rocking like this in rooms on behalf of her constituents and negotiating with the other side….seems like a needed aspect to be in those type of rooms.
“Seem”
Ok she was sensitive. She wasn't being a straight shooter truth teller she was being pissy they weren't tossing her alley oops. This is exemplified by her throwing a trantrum when they wanted her to answer the trump question. If she would have just said "fukk them" like you're trying to make it seem that'd be one thing. But she didn't want to answer the question.“Seem”
She don’t p*ssyfoot around….to people it “seems” that she’s sensitive.
She gives wordsalad about how bring in the MAGA voters into her tent….to people it’ll “seem” that she’s soft/and acquiescing.
To many politicians moving by that people will “seem” of them. To win overall on a national level, sure some will have to play that game such as Obama as the gay marriage thing (very loose & stretch of a comparison, but still).
However, we don’t need and shouldn’t have all our politicians play this “game” or “character”. We need a lot that will simply stand on shyt & be themselves. That’ll draw/activate a particular type of voter.
Seems like a good clip to me. I believe from a statistical perspective she’s right about not needing 40% of that voting block to win….
We gotta stop this requiring politeness shyt from one side and even moreso if it’s a female from that one side.
If Porter rocking like this in rooms on behalf of her constituents and negotiating with the other side….seems like a needed aspect to be in those type of rooms.
Katie talking big girl shyt. Kamala said here you go and Katie said I don’t even need to bring out my poster board and pointer for this one it’s in the bagwhat coalition?
The framing of the question was kinda ass imo. Was it purposeful? I assume so, cause the interviewer wanted to catch a reaction either way “fukk those voters” or a “bothside word salad”. But who knows…..but what we do know questioning / attacking the framing/context of shyt what Porter is most known for.
I feel like that is what she said.
That's where she eventually landed but she took a whole other trip to get there, acting like the journalist was throwing her a gotcha question.
“Seem”
She don’t p*ssyfoot around….to people it “seems” that she’s sensitive.
She gives wordsalad about how bring in the MAGA voters into her tent….to people it’ll “seem” that she’s soft/and acquiescing.
To many politicians moving by that people will “seem” of them. To win overall on a national level, sure some will have to play that game such as Obama as the gay marriage thing (very loose & stretch of a comparison, but still).
However, we don’t need and shouldn’t have all our politicians play this “game” or “character”. We need a lot that will simply stand on shyt & be themselves. That’ll draw/activate a particular type of voter.
Either people gonna fukk with you or not. You play the “what will they think of me” game too much, then you gonna start not even do what you say you value….i.e. Kamala.
Ayo come on breh 
