Democratic Party Rebuild

[Loose]

Its quite evident that's it's not clear to you.

Yea because I can post pictures of tons of politicans who was endorsed and ran on the opposite/ was ditched by the people you propped up

Fetterman isn't the only person in that picture

Who gives a fukk, your justification for posting this picture is that everyone progressives endorse are grifters, its a corn ball post by a corn ball account. "omg tusli supported a candidacy Bernie hangs with grifters!" This really is tlr

What's clear to everyone else is how full of sh*t you are.

Likewise

 

[Hood Critic]

I see a Dem campaigning with Dems. Unless there's some backstory to these specific events/photos?

Bernie Sanders isn't a Democrat. He is an independent who caucuses with the Democrats.

Those pictures of him endorsing those 3 "progressive" candidates is part of a much larger conversation that has been going on in the Dem party. The progressive side of the house often lacks discernment about the candidates they choose to get behind. The desperation to build the coalition has continuously hurt their credibility.

 

[Hood Critic]

Yea because I can post pictures of tons of politicans who was endorsed and ran on the opposite/ was ditched by the people you propped up

How are you STILL missing the point?

 

[Loose]

How are you STILL missing the point?

i know reading is hard for you, ill quote myself.

Who gives a fukk, your justification for posting this picture is that everyone progressives endorse are grifters, its a corn ball post by a corn ball account. "omg tusli supported a candidacy Bernie hangs with grifters!" This really is tlr

 

[Hood Critic]

i know reading is hard for you, ill quote myself.

This is coming from the same person who's ENTIRE political interest is based on genocide in Gaza and "look what the US made everybody else do".

Who gives a f*ck?! Well ironically you should. As that picture represents the wing of the Democratic party that closely aligns with the only beliefs you seem to have. The fact that they can continue to get behind people who literally turn out to have their own agendas, that would seem concerning to someone who claims to care so much.

But we know why you're unable to comprehend this, because social media hasn't fed it to you yet.

 

[Loose]

This is coming from the same person who's ENTIRE political interest is based on genocide in Gaza and "look what the US made everybody else do".

now you just have resorted to making up shyt after being sonned repeatedly for posting a centrist grifter account. If my political ideologically was focused on" look what the US made everybody else do" I damn sure wouldn't have voted for Joe biden in 2020 and kamala Harris in 2024

Who gives a f*ck?! Well ironically you should. As that picture represents the wing of the Democratic party that closely aligns with the only beliefs you seem to have.

Although i didn't vote for bernie sanders anyway , i don't have to agree with everyone he endorse, in fact i don't agree with majority of the people politicans endorse. i voted for Elizabeth warren in the 2020 primary, i don't agree with her endorsing mcmorrow. It's almost like youbcan have an ideology and have disagreements within your views crazy concept

The fact that they can continue to get behind people who literally turn out to have their own agendas, that would seem concerning to someone who claims to care so much.

Yea this just centrist babble.

But we know why you're unable to comprehend this, because social media hasn't fed it to you yet.

Ironically social media led you to a centrist stooge who still defends Joe biden talk about feeding views

 

[Hood Critic]

now you just have resorted to making up shyt after being sonned repeatedly

You really think that's what you've done with all this goofy ass babbling?

The only thing you've successfully done is repeat that you can't accept the truth if it comes from someone you don't agree with.

 

[wire28]

Ouch Bernie Bros, they kinda got y'all there

He sure has a knack for identifying a certain type

 

[wire28]

Its quite evident that's it's not clear to you.

Fetterman isn't the only person in that picture but mysteriously he's the only one you all want to try and point out. And now somehow you've managed to bring in the retired senior citizen who probably fell asleep today while eating his ice cream.

What's clear to everyone else is how full of sh*t you are.

*Posts picture of Bernie and fetterman*

JOE BIDEN

 

[Outlaw]

Outlaw actually is playing around with real antisemitism but he's never been the sharpest tool in the shed. Blue MAGA should probably get their mans.

What’s antisemitic about what I’ve said?

 

[Loose]

 

[KFBF]

Edit

 

[Hood Critic]

Still fighting for dear life to prove a point no one is arguing. No one here has an issue with a relatable candidate who can speak to the average voting populace.

The problem is a candidate has to do more than just pass that basic eye test. They need to at minimum have more than one or two core principles that align with Liberal ideology. What use is a candidate to the party who is anti-war and pro-labor but fiscally conservative on economics and entitlements? That candidate is guaranteed to cause chaos if the party doesn't have a strong majority. Manchin got away with this because he was the only D who could win that red WV seat. Planter might have a similar scenario in Maine but your Fettermans, Gabbards, and Sinemas could have been replaced by others.

You all are some of the same people who consistently called Crockett a terrible candidate and politician, yet she fit the very profile you're championing.

So I think it's safe to assume we all believe in some form or fashion that someone could pass the initial eye test but turn to not be an ideal choice.

 

[Loose]

Still fighting for dear life to prove a point no one is arguing. No one here has an issue with a relatable candidate who can speak to the average voting populace.

The problem is a candidate has to do more than just pass that basic eye test. They need to at minimum have more than one or two core principles that align with Liberal ideology. What use is a candidate to the party who is anti-war and pro-labor but fiscally conservative on economics and entitlements? That candidate is guaranteed to cause chaos if the party doesn't have a strong majority. Manchin got away with this because he was the only D who could win that red WV seat. Planter might have a similar scenario in Maine but your Fettermans, Gabbards, and Sinemas could have been replaced by others.

You all are some of the same people who consistently called Crockett a terrible candidate and politician, yet she fit the very profile you're championing.

So I think it's safe to assume we all believe in some form or fashion that someone could pass the initial eye test but turn to not be an ideal choice.

Yea you have to stick to military discussion, you out of your element. Nothing about Crockett voting history profiles as a progressive

 

[Pressure]

Yea you have to stick to military discussion, you out of your element. Nothing about Crockett voting history profiles as a progressive

https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=house