Democrats and Trans Rights

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,305
Reputation
-34,891
Daps
640,827
Reppin
The Deep State

PoorAndDangerous

Superstar
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
9,592
Reputation
1,162
Daps
34,632
if your position is that the marginalized group in this picture is the one on the right, you're not "the good guy". you're not "tolerant". you're a fukking piece of shyt

images
that's a whole ass man :russ:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,305
Reputation
-34,891
Daps
640,827
Reppin
The Deep State

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,892
Reputation
4,608
Daps
45,496

Pull Up the Roots

Breakfast for dinner.
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
25,486
Reputation
12,434
Daps
110,030
Reppin
Detroit
I watched the entire 31-minute video they're referencing, and the article is pulling the most vivid phrases out of context to manufacture outrage. The segment they highlight is a discussion of an adult, not a minor, and the clinicians were addressing ethical limits and how to handle edge-case requests, not endorsing them, not normalizing them, and certainly not performing them on demand.

This poorly-written piece of disinformation is published on Bari Weiss' culture wars indoctrination blog, by Leor Sapir, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute -- that should tell you that this is really about advancing a political aganda, not accurately describing medical practice. They are cherry-picking a few extreme edge-case requests, removing the surrounding conversation about assessment, consent, comorbidities, and refusal criteria, and then wrapping it in culture-war rhetoric. It is exactly the same tactic they used that led them to platforming Jamie Reed -- the woman who mislead about the St. Louis gender clinic -- and favored "whistleblower" by people like Jesse Singal and the "Blocked and Reported" sub you're now directly linking to.

They also chose to link a long video while banking on people not watching it. Because if you do watch it, what you see isn't rogue surgeons or casual surgeries, but a professional room grappling with rare cases, ethical boundaries, mental health considerations, and the difference between what a patient requests and what clinicians should actually do.

When you have to cut out context, sensationalize phrasing, and funnel it through some of the most disreputable publications, like the NY Post/Manhattan Institute/"Free" Press to make it land, it stops being journalism and starts being narrative construction. This isn't a good-faith concern for youth; it's more trans panic bullshyt.



On the same day the attorney general’s office announced its investigation, Reed went public with her allegations in an op-ed published in The Free Press, a news website started by Bari Weiss, a former op-ed writer and editor at The New York Times. Reed, who has a master’s degree in clinical research management, concluded her op-ed by calling for a “moratorium on the hormonal and surgical treatment of young people with gender dysphoria.”
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,305
Reputation
-34,891
Daps
640,827
Reppin
The Deep State
I watched the entire 31-minute video they're referencing, and the article is pulling the most vivid phrases out of context to manufacture outrage. The segment they highlight is a discussion of an adult, not a minor, and the clinicians were addressing ethical limits and how to handle edge-case requests, not endorsing them, not normalizing them, and certainly not performing them on demand.

This poorly-written piece of disinformation is published on Bari Weiss' culture wars indoctrination blog, by Leor Sapir, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute -- that should tell you that this is really about advancing a political aganda, not accurately describing medical practice. They are cherry-picking a few extreme edge-case requests, removing the surrounding conversation about assessment, consent, comorbidities, and refusal criteria, and then wrapping it in culture-war rhetoric. It is exactly the same tactic they used that led them to platforming Jamie Reed -- the woman who mislead about the St. Louis gender clinic -- and favored "whistleblower" by people like Jesse Singal and the "Blocked and Reported" sub you're now directly linking to.

They also chose to link a long video while banking on people not watching it. Because if you do watch it, what you see isn't rogue surgeons or casual surgeries, but a professional room grappling with rare cases, ethical boundaries, mental health considerations, and the difference between what a patient requests and what clinicians should actually do.

When you have to cut out context, sensationalize phrasing, and funnel it through some of the most disreputable publications, like the NY Post/Manhattan Institute/"Free" Press to make it land, it stops being journalism and starts being narrative construction. This isn't a good-faith concern for youth; it's more trans panic bullshyt.



Do you support youth gender transition surgery?
 
Top