Democrats ignore the left at their peril. Midwesterners aren't scared of socialism — they're hungry

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,595
Daps
81,968
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
  • SHARE THIS —
In a recent interview on CNN, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) claimed that candidates who push policies "too far to the left" won’t be able to win in Midwestern states. It’s an idea that many Democrats have returned to in the wake of surprises like democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s New York primary victory in June. The theory is that more bold, left-wing ideas might appeal to some voters on the coasts, but average folks in the heartland aren’t interested in scary ideas like socialism.

While this argument may comfort mainstream liberals, it’s not one that reflects the history — or the present — of socialism in the Midwest.

The theory is that more bold left-wing ideas might appeal to some voters on the coasts, but average folks in the heartland aren’t interested in scary ideas like socialism.

From the workers’ struggles in the 19th and 20th centuries that won the eight-hour workday to the growth of a fighting labor movement to my own election as a millennial socialist city council member in Chicago, Midwesterners have consistently backed socialist movements and socialist candidates that reject the political status quo and fight for the working-class values of solidarity and equality.

Indeed, despite what Duckworth or anyone else might think, socialists have a long history in this region. Eugene Debs, whose labor and political activism in the around the turn of the 20th century made him the most important socialist organizer in American history (and one of Bernie Sanders’ icons), is from Terre Haute, Indiana. “Sewer socialists” governed Milwaukee and other areas of Wisconsin for decades, including Victor L. Berger, who in 1910 was elected to the House of Representatives — the same position Ocasio-Cortez is on the verge of winning this November.

Midwestern cities and towns such as Dayton, Ohio, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Flint, Michigan, all have proud socialist backgrounds. “Appeal to Reason,” the most widely read socialist publication in U.S. history, was published out on the plains of Girard, Kansas; Oklahoma was a national hotbed for Socialist Party organizing for much of the 20th century’s first half.

The Midwest has also been home to militant worker organizing for over a century, from the Haymarket massacre in Chicago that sparked the modern American labor movement as we know it, to the Flint sit-down strikes of the 1936-1937 which upended the U.S. auto industry, to the founding of public-sector unionism out of Wisconsin in the 1950s, to more recent fights like the Chicago Teachers Union’s 2012 strike.

Far from being allergic to socialism and class struggle, as Duckworth suggests, the Midwest has always been a region steeped in it — even leading the way.

This isn’t all ancient history, either. In the most recent Democratic presidential primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders — for whom I was a proud delegate to the Democratic National Convention — ran an unapologetically left-wing campaign, proudly fighting for popular policies like Medicare for all, a $15 minimum wage and free public college, all while proclaiming himself a “democratic socialist.”

Were Midwesterners scared off by his clear embrace of socialist ideas? Far from it. Sanders won primaries throughout the Midwest, in states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan and Indiana and barely lost in Iowa, Missouri and Illinois.

Far from being allergic to socialism and class struggle, as Duckworth suggests, the Midwest has always been a region steeped in it — even leading the way.

This isn’t all ancient history, either. In the most recent Democratic presidential primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders — for whom I was a proud delegate to the Democratic National Convention — ran an unapologetically left-wing campaign, proudly fighting for popular policies like Medicare for all, a $15 minimum wage and free public college, all while proclaiming himself a “democratic socialist.”

Were Midwesterners scared off by his clear embrace of socialist ideas? Far from it. Sanders won primaries throughout the Midwest, in states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan and Indiana and barely lost in Iowa, Missouri and Illinois.

Indeed, this hunger for anti-corporate, anti-establishment politics is spreading throughout the midwest. You can see it in the massive growth of the Democratic Socialists of America — currently boasting over 44,000 members. Ocasio-Cortez and I are both members of DSA, which has seen chapters spring up everywhere from Indianapolis and Cincinnati to Des Moines, Iowa and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. My own chapter in Chicago now has over 1,500 members.

The Democratic establishment may not want to acknowledge the growing popularity of the party’s left flank and its agenda of fighting for real social, racial and economic justice. But if they hope to win, it’s time they embrace it. If they don’t, we’ll take them head-on.

Opinion | Dear Democrats: Midwesterners aren’t scared of socialism — they’re hungry for it
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
3,393
Reputation
-5,203
Daps
12,905
Whats sanders and the other delusional fools on the far left fail to understand is you can offer 15 dollar minimum wage and free healthcare to blue collar whites all you want and Midwesterner and they wont vote for you, because you support Black lives matter, immigration reform, and you are against police brutality. its about race not economics, as long as they think they welfare and health-care are not going to those lazy negroes they are good living in poverty,
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,555
Reppin
NULL
Sanders also lost Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania and if you use barely lost to explain Iowa , Illinois defeats the same can be said about his Michigan winning margin. These states have close elections for a reason. There are lots of social conservatives in the Midwest , Cincinatti is more conservative than Cleveland or Columbus and Dayton is more red than Toledo. There are parts of southern Ohio that have more in common with Kentucky than the other parts of the states particularly the Toledo to Cleveland belt. There are a lot of social conservatives who vote for Democrats because they used to be in some union but there are other facets of voting that make conservative appeals work for them. The author of the piece does not mention that some of those states have had GOP Governors who have strong ratings even from Democrats like Kasich. History is fine but the author seems to assume that those cities never changed or that their politics remained the same. Southwest Ohio might have a history with embracing socialist causes but it is fertile ground for Republicans for a while
 

brick james

John piffington
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
1,876
Reputation
170
Daps
4,001
The only evidence the author presents is having 1500 members in Chicago and 44000 nationwide. The socialist revolution is on the way comrades
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,736
Reputation
2,695
Daps
24,004
Reppin
Des Moines, IA
Ummm....no. I have lived in the Midwest most of my life. That shyt does not fly here outside of the already liberal zones.

Bernie winning a few primaries means nothing. Those are not general elections.

Too many blue collar workers here making $17/hour, and when they hear "$15 minimum wage" they dont think well this could eventually lead to a boost in my wages. Instead they hear so the Mcdonalds cashier is going to make almost as much money as me?.

When they hear "free tuition" they hear my taxes are going to skyrocket and I will still owe on my student loans, why should someone else go for free

The truth of the economics is irrelevant. If truth in politics was that important then Trump wouldn't be president
 

mc_brew

#NotMyPresident
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
5,176
Reputation
2,315
Daps
17,228
Reppin
the black cat is my crown...
living wage is polling at over 80 percent. saying you cant win on that is just factually not true.
off topic: i always question these polls that say 80% of people support a living wage or 90% support background checks, etc.... i work with a bunch of rabid cacs who don't come anywhere near supporting that.... what are the chances that i work with the entire 10 - 20% of people that oppose these things...? this is why i always believed trump had a legitimate chance to win the election after he got the rep nom.... these polls just can't be accurate, not to that degree... maybe 50 - 60% support a living wage, maybe.... no way it's 80%...
 

wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,687
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,398
Reppin
NULL
off topic: i always question these polls that say 80% of people support a living wage or 90% support background checks, etc.... i work with a bunch of rabid cacs who don't come anywhere near supporting that.... what are the chances that i work with the entire 10 - 20% of people that oppose these things...? this is why i always believed trump had a legitimate chance to win the election after he got the rep nom.... these polls just can't be accurate, not to that degree... maybe 50 - 60% support a living wage, maybe.... no way it's 80%...
definitely possible they arent 100 percent accurate but 80 is so overwhelming that even if it is really off and dropped to around 50 as you say, you can probably still run on it., i know a lot of people seemed to lose faith in polls after trump won but one thing about that is Hilary was only up by a few percentage points the day of the general and she won the popular vote by around one percent so still within the margin of error. i def wasnt someone who thought trump couldnt win even though i did think hilary would win but not in a landslide. i dont know what to make of the difference between vocal cac and the polls. people dont always answer honestly of course but still. even in so called liberal NY lots of whites are conservative especially in certain areas like staten island or howard beach, yet we do always end up with dems winning.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
85,551
Reputation
3,536
Daps
150,981
Reppin
Brooklyn
I wouldn't piss on any of these people if they were on fire. fukk them all.
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,555
Reppin
NULL
off topic: i always question these polls that say 80% of people support a living wage or 90% support background checks, etc.... i work with a bunch of rabid cacs who don't come anywhere near supporting that.... what are the chances that i work with the entire 10 - 20% of people that oppose these things...? this is why i always believed trump had a legitimate chance to win the election after he got the rep nom.... these polls just can't be accurate, not to that degree... maybe 50 - 60% support a living wage, maybe.... no way it's 80%...
Polls cannot replicate real world behavior and many people who use surveys in a professional capacity know this, however they report digestible news to the public. Issue based polling tends to avoid contextual issues, in some cases people can make trade-offs on issues, one may like living wage but weights the Supreme Court higher and thus vote differently. Framing effects also work in polling, i saw one poll in the time the Muslim ban was first in the news and it had more support standing alone while support dropped when Trump's name was put alongside it and the same thing was observed with using ACA vs Obamacare. In any case if you hang around some of the places in the Midwest romanticized by some of the Progressives you will see that they are just as amenable to Rush Limbaugh type rhetoric. If you look at Ohio elections county by county every election year there are quite some swings, Obama won 15 out of 80 something counties against a private equity guy like Romney.
 
Top