Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) = CEO of the Government.

Elim Garak

Veteran
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
43,471
Reputation
8,438
Daps
213,275
Democrats are on board with DOGE because they are hoping for an opportunity to slash defense funding. It’s this kind of naive shyt that has made the Democratic Party irrelevant.
No they aren't. I've seen two people say this and one is an independent and the other one is :whoa:. Democrats love increasing defense spending as much as Republicans do.
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,409
Reputation
501
Daps
8,158
Reppin
NULL
He shouldn’t be able to do this, he was suppose to make suggestions. Spending is approved by Congress. The executive branch isn’t supposed to come back and say “no spend it on something else”.

This is all illegal.
All congress is doing is telling him he can't. Correction, democratic congress. What are they going to do about it? Arrest him? Give him a good talking to?
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
28,816
Reputation
6,233
Daps
109,373
Reppin
New York City
All congress is doing is telling him he can't. Correction, democratic congress. What are they going to do about it? Arrest him? Give him a good talking to?
In the short term shyt isn’t going to happen. I have come to terms with the fact Trump and Elon are probably going to get away with it. It’s the long term get back that potentially will be a bytch and why Elon has a bunch of kids doing this. He sent in a bunch of pawns because he knows they are going to get got and he can throw them under the bus.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
18,233
Reputation
7,969
Daps
106,036
Reppin
NYC
Going into the Govt. and "deleting" agencies when you have zero experience in Govt. is a recipe for disaster.

It's like you start deleting files in a computer because you think they do nothing, and then one day you turn on your computer and you get an error, or you go to load up a program and you get more error messages.

Govt. isn't a Twitter front page where you get to say outrageous sh*t and act like an "edge lord" and start banning people because you don't like them.
 

The Intergalactic Koala

Reporting for Duty
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
66,239
Reputation
25,837
Daps
270,723
Reppin
Koalabama and the Cosmos
I got to say it again the reason Musk sent a bunch of 20 years olds to do this is because anyone older would know this is going to eventually get them dragged in front of Congress to explain and that it might lead to jail time.


DOGE was suppose to make suggestions. Not cut and redistribute funding roved by Congress. Remember “Her emails” with Hilary this is a billion times worse than that.

In the Southside, we call those...:"crash dummies"
 

WIA20XX

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
8,188
Reputation
3,918
Daps
25,692
All congress is doing is telling him he can't. Correction, democratic congress. What are they going to do about it? Arrest him? Give him a good talking to?

This is the thing that I don't think regular people and the media don't want to recognize.

He did all the same BS during the first time (and throughout his life).
And he's had enablers as well.

Folks talmbout marching and boycotts....
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
18,233
Reputation
7,969
Daps
106,036
Reppin
NYC
In the short term shyt isn’t going to happen. I have come to terms with the fact Trump and Elon are probably going to get away with it. It’s the long term get back that potentially will be a bytch and why Elon has a bunch of kids doing this. He sent in a bunch of pawns because he knows they are going to get got and he can throw them under the bus.
I have a feeling that Musk made them sign agreements that say Musk knew nothing about what they were doing.
When sh*t hits the fan Musk will leave them stranded on an island and move on to his next move.
 

Jean toomer

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
10,828
Reputation
1,651
Daps
32,503
No they aren't. I've seen two people say this and one is an independent and the other one is :whoa:. Democrats love increasing defense spending as much as Republicans do.
Contextually recent defense spending increased under democratic administrations due to conflicts initiated by republican administrations. If you go back 40 years, on average spending under republicans far outstripped democrats. Theres a recent pub by the AEI that substantiates that. Other than Crockett and Holmes Norton who are the serious minded democratic reps on the sub committee. There’s also a recent Soo’s article that cites 6 democrats who see DOGE as an opportunity to cut subsidies to fossil fuels et al. I could go on, party of naiveness and appeasement.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
22,131
Reputation
7,020
Daps
109,591
He shouldn’t be able to do this, he was suppose to make suggestions. Spending is approved by Congress. The executive branch isn’t supposed to come back and say “no spend it on something else”.

This is all illegal.
This is a hostile take over and those fake ass congress clowns have allowed it to happen.
 
Top