Album definitely lived up to the hype for me. So many dope tracks and not many skips for a double disc
It's a whole other album. 2.5 is the other disc.It's a dope album but like somebody said that 2 & 2.5 shyt threw me off.
What's on 2.5 that's not on 2?
True that, not really any skips but I don't know. The only thing keeping me from saying yes is that it didn't have any replay value and while he made a quality album it could have been more deeper. When you compare it to the first one, it's a good sequel which is hard to do but I'm not sure I can say it's a classic or anything like the first one or like he was hyping it to be.Album definitely lived up to the hype for me. So many dope tracks and not many skips for a double disc
You bugging, both of them were good.2 sounded like a mixtape. 2.5 sounded more like an album. I ended up buying that. It was much closer to living up to the hype.
2 had too many rehashed songs and ideas to the point where it sounded like mixtape.You bugging, both of them were good.
I disagree but to each their own.2 had too many rehashed songs and ideas to the point where it sounded like mixtape.
game's discog is very underrated imo!
Yeah it did...only one dont like it is curtis fans