WiiU struggling so bad to even be on par with current Gen Call of Duty Ghosts... .![]()
1080p monster hunter tri and wind waker say hello
only thing struggling is the dev 
WiiU struggling so bad to even be on par with current Gen Call of Duty Ghosts... .![]()
only thing struggling is the dev 
It's a snooze fest, if you've played BF3 you won't be experiencing anything differentIs it really?Because you need to complete it in order to unlock certain weapons.
Damn meach you sound kind of mad right here. LOLKillzone is last gen confirmed.
25 A.I. On screen is pathetic for a next gen game. Ps4 is serverly underpowered. Maybe Sony should push this game back
![]()
U ight breh breh??No one is saying thatBut this game is extradionarry in regards to how technically flawed it is. You can go bu bu but killzone FPS all you want but that is 1080p and we know graphically pushes it. This game already looks lackluster abd is running far lower resolution
PS3 exclusives shytTED on Xbox exclusives. They showed what the system was capable of. That's a fact.



whoops look like you forgot something.
Yea compare 24 unique ai's with destructibility, dynamic objects and bleeding edge graphics to hundreds of simple zombies with weak graphics brehs. Plus he didn't say there's going to be LOTS of scenarios where it's going to be over 24 enemies on the screen at the same time.
There's hundreds of zombies on Dead Rising 3 just walking and attacking you with simple animations in bland, drab environments with hardly anything going on in 720p at <30fps.
Breh I really don't care if it's the same concept. Killzone just looks leagues ahead of Dead Rising 3 in ALL respects so fukk that other shyt you talking about breh. Who cares about colliison detection and "pathing" lol that's some geek stuff. Killzone looks more impressive overall and running at 1080P too??it's the same concept. the number of AI affects performance
having "hundreds" of AI interacting with the player and each other isn't exactly easy. they have to be constantly updating their pathing based on collisions with each other. not to mention all the collisions that take place when you drive a vehicle through "hundreds" of them
you can say they were overly ambitious with this project. or that the X1 hardware isn't up to the task. but I don't think it's fair to bash the devs like they're "lazy" or "stupid"

Dynasty Warriors is "not as easy" according to your logic.It's a snooze fest, if you've played BF3 you won't be experiencing anything different
/rantIt's better than Arma 3.it's a typical boring shooter. but the AI is frustratingly stupid. especially your squad's AI. they'll be standing right next to the enemy, and won't even shoot. I'm in the back, trying to get my snipe on, and somehow an enemy walks past my whole squad to flank me... all the fukking time/rant
It's better than Arma 3.

So.Arma's kinda the opposite. your AI squad will kill all the enemies before you see one
it's like they made the AI in BF4 purposely bad, so you can do all the killing
BF4 has no editor though
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=167081421
